Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Brand new kitchen units badly damaged.


Flow B
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1031 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Quote

 

I bought a new oven to fit in new units. So much steam it soaked surrounding units. Noticed damage 6 weeks later. Company sent engineer (not fit for purpose) retailers gave me money back for oven and transferred me over to the legal team company who owned the oven. Went through the legal team with lots of Photos of damage, 3 quotations for replacement, emails from company manager that I  bought the units from saying that the units were no longer under warranty due to ingress of moisture. Carpenters said it was a lot more £ to fix easier to replace. 
Company who own oven offered a fraction of what it would cost to replace the units and get them fitted.

retailer offered a small amount of £ on top. I just want my kitchen how it was originally before damage. Tried ombudsman but they can’t help as these companies seem to have loop holes so no honest help for me and others in this sort of situation. Any advice appreciated 

 

 

I bought a new oven to fit in new units. So much steam it soaked surrounding units. 

Noticed damage 6 weeks later.

 

Company sent engineer (not fit for purpose) retailers gave me money back for oven and transferred me over to the legal team company who owned the oven.

 

Went through the legal team with lots of Photos of damage, 3 quotations for replacement, emails from company manager that I  bought the units from saying that the units were no longer under warranty due to ingress of moisture.

Carpenters said it was a lot more £ to fix easier to replace. 


Company who own oven offered a fraction of what it would cost to replace the units and get them fitted.

 

retailer offered a small amount of £ on top.

I just want my kitchen how it was originally before damage. Tried ombudsman but they can’t help as these companies seem to have loop holes so no honest help for me and others in this sort of situation.

 

Any advice appreciated 

Edited by BankFodder
Restructured in order to make it readable
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you tell us about the oven – make model price et cetera. Who supplied it? Whether supplier is the same as the installers?

If not then who were the installers and who specified that oven and that installation?

You say "the company" sent an engineer. I suppose you mean the oven supplier or was it the oven manufacturer? – it's not clear.

The retailers gave you the money back for the oven. Don't understand that a legal team company owned the oven what is that about please?

You talk about the company that sold you the units – is this the same company as the oven supplier or a different company?

You are talking about damage, replacement, et cetera but really we have no idea of the values you are talking about and who carried out the assessments.

So what has been the estimate for repairing the units? Is it clear that that can be done properly so that they were in the position that they were in before the damage?

What is the cost of replacing the units – including the cost of removing the old ones?

What are you doing for an oven was now?

You say that some money on top was offered. Did you accept this? Was this paid conditionally as full and final settlement – or was it simply a goodwill payment?

How much on top is paid?

As you can see, you expressed your problem in a very generalised way and we really need a more precise description.

Finally, you can see that I have restructured your post and introduce spacing although I haven't managed to do anything about punctuation – to make it more readable – especially for people on small screen such as a telephone.

Please can you take care to space and punctuate your posts properly so that they are more accessible.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you tell us about the oven – make model price et cetera. Who supplied it? Whether supplier is the same as the installers?

It was a hotpoint DD2540 around £300 purchased through Very, sauced my own electrician. 

If not then who were the installers and who specified that oven and that installation? Competent qualified electrician fitted it as per instruction manual. 

You say "the company" sent an engineer. I suppose you mean the oven supplier or was it the oven manufacturer? – it's not clear.

Oven manufacturers Hotpoint engineer. 

The retailers gave you the money back for the oven. Don't understand that a legal team company owned the oven what is that about please? After payment from Very they passed me over to UK claims team (hotpoint legal team).

You talk about the company that sold you the units – is this the same company as the oven supplier or a different company?
It’s a different company. 

You are talking about damage, replacement, et cetera but really we have no idea of the values you are talking about and who carried out the assessments.

Builder who fitted units,  manufacturers manager of store where purchased units and a independent carpenter.  

So what has been the estimate for repairing the units? Is it clear that that can be done properly so that they were in the position that they were in before the damage? No it’s Melamine so they wouldn’t match with the rest of the kitchen, also they said the deterioration could change dry out or loss of glue from within units/doors. 
Moisture has blistered inside and joints of units and doors. 


What is the cost of replacing the units – including the cost of removing the old ones? £3000

What are you doing for an oven was now?
I had to go out and get another oven. 

You say that some money on top was offered. Did you accept this? Was this paid conditionally as full and final settlement – or was it simply a goodwill payment?

I did not except the good will offer but was told that I should take the offer from hotpoint and the good will gesture from Very. 

How much on top is paid? 
They made an offer of £300

As you can see, you expressed your problem in a very generalised way and we really need a more precise description.

Hope this is more helpful? 

Finally, you can see that I have restructured your post and introduce spacing although I haven't managed to do anything about punctuation – to make it more readable – especially for people on small screen such as a telephone.

Please can you take care to space and punctuate your posts properly so that they are more accessible. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but we can help you – but can you not repeat my text if you could just put the answers in a single post. It's unhelpful to interleave the answers in the way that you've done

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now the responses are in colour – it's a little easier to understand.

What I'm trying to establish is where the fault is. Was it a faulty oven? Was it incorrectly specified - so that it shouldn't have been installed in that place?

That much isn't clear from your post.

If you chose the item and specified that it should be fitted in that particular place, and if it was correctly installed then it would be difficult to say that it is anybody else's responsibility but yours.
On the other hand, you say that the retailers have accepted the oven back and refunded you. That suggests that they have agreed that the oven is defective in some way. However you haven't made that all clear.

If the oven is defective – then it seems fairly clear that not only are the retailers responsible for the reimbursement of the price of the oven – which they have sorted out, but they are also responsible for any damage which is caused by the operation of a defective oven.

As I say, it's still rather difficult to understand the story from what you have written.

When you think the defect is? Why did the suppliers agree to refund you?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The oven was an  integrated oven and put into a integrated unit. 

 

The engineer from hotpoint put in his findings. 
Work Done: uplift number given ( appliance condensate a lot, leaking onto the new kitchen unit and floor, condensation tray present but still to much water accomodation) new type design- back vent tube not present anymore, all steam is staying inside the oven. 

I asked many time to uk claims what was wrong with the oven after they took it away but they always avoided answering my question. 


I sent so much evidence to both companies of the distraction caused but they always wanted more and more. 


Uk claims know the oven is defective as they wouldn’t of offered a partial amount of money. 
 

They know all the loop holes so they offered the price of units - 25% indemnity

but nothing towards removal or fitting of new units. 

My argument is, why should I pay out more again because the oven I purchased was not fit for purpose and damaged my property that was not even 6 weeks old. 
 

Thanks honeybee13 for editing and changing colour for my answers. 
 

I thought copying your questions and answering below was easier Bankfodder. 
It was not my intention to upset you. 

Thanks both. 
 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You're quite right in thinking that you shouldn't have to pay out more for defective oven and also for the damage that was caused your property.

What we need to do is make sure that we have prepared your evidence sufficiently so that your case is unassailable when you begin your claim against them and if you then have to take them to court.

How long ago was the oven installed?

 

It seems fairly clear that the oven was defective. Please could you post up your written evidence of this in PDF format so we can see.

The next thing we need to do is to show conclusively that the consequential damage was directly associated with the escape of steam. We also need to have probably two independent quotations for the removal of the damaged units and their replacement
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankfodder 

Are you with a legal team? 
I came hear to get impartial advice on my next steps but your talking as if you are taking on a case? 
I understand this might go to small claims court but my question at the beginning was to see what my rights are and what steps to take next. 
All of what you asked above I have collected but I don’t wish to share any more information as this is an open site. 
I would just appreciate steps to take before I head to a court case. 
 

Thank 🤗

Link to post
Share on other sites

The level of support that we normally give is to advise you on your rights and also to advise you the best way to take your claim if necessary to the county court.

We very often help people draft their letters of claim and also their particulars of claim and to deal with the responses from the defendant.

 

You should understand that knowing your rights is one thing. Enforcing them can be a totally different matter. This is where you need to prepare very carefully and understand what your arguments will be.

If you simply want to know your rights then I have laid it out above in an earlier post and there isn't much more to say.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...