Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Initial Parking ANPR PCN - The Royal Oak (Next to the Co-op) Bookham High Street, Bookham, Surreym, Surrey


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In Bookham, surrey there is a small co-op with a small car park next to it with a parking meter.  Parked there, put about a £1 in the meter as I only planned to pop in quickly.  I had to enter my car reg number into the meter.   I thought I had paid for parking until received a parking fine of £100 discounted to £60 if paid within 14 days.  I immediately appealed the charge and told them i paid for the parking at the meter and this is the response!: (I definitely smell a rat!)

 

Issue date: 20/05/2021 POPLA verification code: xxxxxxxxxx.

 

Thank you for your appeal received on 26/05/2021 regarding the above detailed Parking Charge Notice.

 

We have carefully reviewed the case and considered the points that you raised in conjunction with the facts and evidence available to me. On this occasion, your appeal has been rejected and we are satisfied that this Parking Charge Notice was issued correctly.

 

The Royal Oak, Bookham is private land and is subject to a parking management scheme put in place by the operator at the landowner’s request. There are specific terms and conditions in place as part of this scheme. These terms and conditions are stated on the signs installed at the site, which are displayed in clear and prominent positions. The terms and conditions of the scheme at this location state that a valid payment must be made for the length of time the vehicle is parked on site.

 

On 16/05/2021, the vehicle was parked without this payment being made. This was a breach of these terms and conditions. As stated on our, very large, BPA approved signs ' By parking or remaining in this car park you agree to the terms of the Parking Contract (if you do not agree to them then please leave within 10 minutes of entry)' Therefore, the charge remains valid and payment is due.

 

Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the motorist to ensure that they seek out, read and comply with the terms and conditions of parking that are in place. By parking on site in breach of these terms and conditions, it has been agreed that the charge detailed on the signs will be paid. I appreciate that this may not be the desired outcome, however, you have now reached the end of our internal appeal process.

 

The three options available are listed below: Your options

1) Pay the PCN at the reduced amount of £60.00 by 14 days. After this time the opportunity to pay at the reduced amount will no longer be available and the amount outstanding will rise to the full amount of £100.00. This will need to be paid by 14 days. Payment can be made online by phone or by post. Go to www.initialparking.co.uk, call 0333 023 0138. Payments can also be made by cheque or postal order made payable to Initial Parking Limited.

 

Please ensure you write your Parking Charge Notice number clearly on the reverse.

Please do not send cash through the post.

Payment can be made using a debit or credit card by calling the automated payment line on 03330230138.

For our full Complaints

 

Procedure please visit www.initialparking.co.uk.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please complete this:

Have you received a Parking Ticket? - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group

and post up the appeal you sent too.

 

i would have thought by now surrey_36 you'd know the score wirh speculative invoices..

 

they are NOT FINES

and you NEVER appeal them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know DX - I've had similar in the past! I immediately appealed as I had bought a ticket thinking that would just settle the matter, clearly not!  I'm surprised as Bookham is such a small little high street this parking company must catch out tons of people as it appears to be just a standard pay and display car park!  Disgraceful - I don't now how the council allow them to get away with this..

 

1 Date of the infringement

Give answer here
16/05/21

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

20/05/21
 

3 Date received

26/5/21
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

YES 
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

YES
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

YES as i bought a ticket
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

yes
 

7 Who is the parking company?

Initial Parking Ltd

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

The Royal Oak (Next to the Co-op) Bookham High Street, Bookham, Surrey
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

POPLA
 

 

parking edited.pdf

Edited by surrey_36
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Initial Parking ANPR PCN - The Royal Oak (Next to the Co-op) Bookham High Street, Bookham, Surreym, Surrey
21 minutes ago, surrey_36 said:

Disgraceful - I don't now how the council allow them to get away with this..

what has any private parking got to do with the council?

 

i would suggest you put the wrong reg number in the machine?

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it that you haven't kept the receipt.

 

Does the car park belong to the Royal Oak or the Coop. Whichever one it is go there and speak to the manager'owner and explain that you paid and entered your reg no. though perhaps not quite the right number and ask if they can get it cancelled.

 

While you are there if they cannot help you can at least take photos of the sigs and where they are especially the one at the entrance and the one either on the pay machine  or next to it which will be the valid  T&Cs. Does the ticket register your reg. no. ?

 

It's very doubtful that planning permission was ever applied for but you should also check the local Council planning portal to confirm. 

 

When you know who is responsible for the parking crooks to be there, slam the site on Twitter, Facebook etc. You paid and still they are trying to charge you.

 

Dx made the point that you probably enetered your number wrongly-or maybe they read a zero as a nought or vice versa. Have you appealed to POPLA  or was it just Initial that turned you down.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point DX nothing to do with the council, ill follow these  recommended steps and go take a look at the site..

 

Lookinforinfo I think its the royal oak but I think they must get people constantly parking in there for the co-op as its right next door.  Ill go take some photos and post them up here shortly..

 

thanks both for help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you still have any proof of payment, such as payment by card or the actual receipt?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So its the Royal Oak then.  Did you have any luck speaking to the landlord?

 

Can you please answer the questions in post 7?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it that the first sign you showed on your post wa the one at the entrance. Parking Regulations  Apply. This is a pay and display car park. If that is the case then there is no contract offered at the entrance it is just an invitation to treat. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you say, live & learn.  You're exactly the same as me.  I always pay in cash and never bothered to keep any tickets ... until I came across this site and learnt about the disgusting practises of the private parking companies.

 

Good luck with the Royal Oak, keep on at them.

 

Either the machine is knackered and they are sending these demands to everyone, or as others have said more probably you keyed in an "O" instead of a "0" or an "l" instead of a "1" or vice versa.  Legally this is "de minimis" AKA "the law does not deal with trivialities) and means you don't owe them a bean (although of course they will try it on anyway). 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks FTMDave - so is it safe to ignore all correspondence to them - or should I write again and insist on the fact I paid for a ticket and that I will not pay any fine! Or just ignore completely.

 

The pub said they don't own the car park but it causes them a lot of problems, people use the car park and pay at the machine and if they come into the pub they refund them the parking costs - they said they think that many people just ignore parking fines from this company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what fine?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore now.

 

Come back here though if you get a Letter Before Claim/Letter Before Action, and we'll see them off with a wrong reg snotty letter.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

DCAs have no power to do anything as it's not their debt.  Relax & ignore.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd have hoped after all the debts and years of being here you'd already known this..................

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...