Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @FTMDavethanks for guiding me step by step. I have captured the photos night time as well if you see they are not visible even in day time how can anyone see in the night
    • just to clarify one matter everyone....   the statement that 'all road markings within any private land/carpark are mere tarmac graffiti is quite correct.   for dedicated use bays - there has to be a clearly visible sign(s) if one parks in those bays, which must be covered by the relevant council planning permission for poles+signs and elsewhere there must be a sign that details their usage conditions/contract.   dx
    • Don't worry, we're getting there bit by bit.   Tomorrow evening I'll try to deal with your questions.   The photos you've taken are superb - they show the signs as tiny and not illuminated.    
    • Good thinking! I only requested the telephone hearing (in the body of the email) and will send the further note tomorrow to cover all bases!
    • @FTMDave i am attaching the photographs of the Alama park please have a look. Checking your previous post where you corrected some line and suggest some but i could not understand. Is it possible if you edit and delete irrelevant lines.    I have edited little bit but not sure what to add and what to look for   Mr XXX, of xxx and I am the Defendant against whom this claim is made. 1.1. I was the registered keeper of the vehicle XXX. 1.2. The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. Where they are not within my own knowledge they are true to the best of my information and belief.   INSUFFICIENT & CONFUSING SIGNAGE  This is likely to be one of your aces so will need a lot of work once you get photos.  The fleecers have also shown a plan where they claim there are signs (their WS post 12, PDF page 15 which you need to confront).   2. I confirm that i was the registered Keeper of the vehicle which is in question in this case and the vehicle was parked in Alma leisure centre Chesterfield. The vehicle was parked there because the driver went to McDonald’s for eat in (the bank statement proof exhibit 1).   3. There were no clear signs at the entrance nor in the car park, it was night time and weather was not clear as well.   3.  Even if the driver had seen the signs, they would have been extremely confusing.  A car is normally allowed to be parked for five hours, yet after midnight this is changed to one hour.  This begs the question for how long a motorist entering at 10pm for example is allowed to stay.  Is it for five hours until 3am or until 1am?   3.1. The PCN/NTK states "period of parking 00:02:05".  It is common sense that a couple of minutes was needed to enter the complex, find McDonald's and find a parking space, before the period of parking began, so it was likely the car entered the car park before midnight allowing the driver to park the car there for five hours.   4.  Even if the driver had seen the signage - they did not - the mention of a £100 charge is literally the last word on the last line of a long board of text.   4. I am not liable to the Claimant for the sum claimed, or any amount at all and this is my Witness Statement in support of my defence as already filed.     UNFAIR TERM   4.  In an interview with the local newspaper (exhibit XXX) Ms Ellie Berkeley, HX PCN administration team leader, said: “The five-hour maximum stay prevents workers from close by abusing the land and parking there for free, without using the shops on site" which makes sense.   5.  This therefore begs the question of why this limit is cut by a massive 80% after midnight when the cinema and eateries are still open.  The driver indeed ate at McDonald's.   6.  Ms Berkeley continued: "Five hours is sufficient time to visit the cinema and also eat at a restaurant".  Certainly five hours are sufficient.  One hour is not.    7.  I would maintain this is an unfair term under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 part 2 section 62 (6) ""A notice is unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations to the detriment of the consumer".  Such a term has absolutely nothing to do with efficient management of a car park and everything to do with trying to catch diners or cinema-goers out and thus have an excuse to issue PCNs.   NO KEEPER LIABILITY   5. The Particulars of Claim do not clarify in what capacity they believe I am liable but state that the Defendant is “liable as the driver or keeper” of the vehicle. This appears to be “fishing” for liability.  Is this really in the PoCs? - you need to look and find out. Where to look on PCN letter?   The rest of your section is about the use of POFA at airports which is completely irrelevant.    Adapt LFI's suggestions re POFA and keeper liability -   First is the fact that they must have a parking period and it is quite clear that entering and leaving the car park does not constitute a parking period since some of the time the motorist is either driving around looking for a parking spot then leaving the spot and driving to the exit. All that takes time so that is one fail.   The other fail is in their wording when they are trying to transfer the liability of the alleged debt from the driver to the keeper. They are supposed to include at Schedule 4 s9 [2][f] this "(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met)". That in itself makes it non compliant but the fact that they haven't got a parking period means they haven't met the applicable conditions.   PROHIBITION  This deals with no stopping cases.  Yours in not no stopping so it is completely irrelevant.   LOCUS STANDI   You have quoted a different contract in a different place with a different PPC.  You need to read and try to find holes in the contract they produced (post 12, page 15 of the PDF for anyone looking in). What shall i add here   Adapt LFI's suggestions -   Looking at their contract, the names of the signatories and their positions in their respective  companies have been redacted. You do need strict proof of who actually signed. There is no specific authorisation from the Client to allow Court action in pursuit of non payers. In section 11 which is like an addendum it states" the Company shall provide parking control" but doesn't state if that includes legal pursuit as well and it does not appear to be signed.   ILLEGAL SIGNAGE   8. After checking, I have found out that there in NO planning permission granted for said signs, therefore making them illegal as lack of planning permission is a criminal offence under the Road Traffic Acts 1962 and 1991 and no contract can be performed where criminality is concerned.   LFI's suggestion -   They are supposed to comply with the Law and the IPC code of Conduct and they have done neither. The new Private Parking Code of Practice  draws attention to it as well  s14.1 [g]  "g) responsibility for obtaining relevant consents e.g. planning or advertising consents relating to signs."   ABUSE OF PROCESS  I've cut some bits out as the CoP hadn't been published when the fleecers went after you.  Are you sure the Unicorn Food Tax in the PoCs is £60? ( I couldn't understand this)   9. The Claimant seeks recovery of the original £100 parking charge plus an additional £60 described as “contractual costs and interest” or “debt collection costs”. No further justification or breakdown has been provided as required under Civil Procedure Rule 16.4.    9.1. As part of the provisions of the Parking (Code of Practice) Act 2019, on 07/02/2022 a new Code of Practice was published by the government, designed to prevent these “rogue” traders from "ripping people off" (the minister's words) with extra charges, which have been deemed unfair (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/privateparking-code-of-practice/private-parking-code-of-practice).    9.3. Section 9 of the new Code of Practice, regulates the matter of recovery costs: “The parking operator must not levy additional costs over and above the level of a parking charge or parking tariff as originally issued.”   9.2. Even before publication of the government’s Code of Practice, Parliament intended that private parking companies could not invent extra charges. PoFA Schedule 4, paragraph 4(5) states that “The maximum sum which may be recovered from the keeper is the amount specified in the notice to keeper” which in this case is £100.    9.4. Previous parking charge cases have found that the parking charge itself is at a level to include the costs of recovery ie: Parking Eye Ltd vs Beavis (2015) UKSC 67 which is the authority for recovery of the parking charge itself and no more, since that sum (£85) was held to already incorporate the costs of an automated private parking business model and the Supreme Court Judges held that a parking firm not in possession cannot plead any part of their case in damages. It is indisputable that an alleged “parking charge” penalty is a sum which the Supreme Court found is already inflated to more than comfortably cover all costs. The case provides a finding of fact by way of precedent, that the £85 (or up to a Trade Body ceiling of £100 depending on the parking firm) covers the costs of the letters. Since 2019, many County Courts have considered claims in excess of £100 to be an abuse of process leading to them being struck out ab initio. An example, in the Caernarfon Court in VCS v Davies, case No. FTQZ4W28 on 4th September 2019, District Judge Jones-Evans stated ‘’Upon it being recorded that District Judge Jones-Evans has over a very significant period of time warned advocates [...] in many cases of this nature before this court that their claim for £60 is unenforceable in law and is an abuse of process and is nothing more than a poor attempt to go behind the decision of the Supreme Court v Beavis which inter alia decided that a figure of £160 as a global sum claimed in this case would be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss and therefore unenforceable in law and if the practice continued, he would treat all cases as a claim for £160 and therefore a penalty and unenforceable in law it is hereby declared [...] the claim is struck out and declared to be wholly without merit and an abuse of process.’’    9.5. In Claim numbers F0DP806M and F0DP201T, Britannia vs Crosby the courts went further in a landmark judgement in November 2019 which followed several parking charge claims being struck out in the area overseen by His Honour Judge Iain HamiltonDouglas Hughes GC, the Designated Civil Judge for Dorset, Hampshire, Isle of Wight & Wiltshire. District Judge Taylor echoed earlier General Judgment or Orders of District Judge Grand, stating ‘’It is ordered that the claim is struck out as an abuse of process. The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverable under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgment in ParkingEye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998...''    9.6. The addition of costs not previously specified on signage are also in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Schedule 2, specifically paras 6, 10 and 14.     Statement of Truth    Alma Leisure.pdf Alma leisure centre.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Boris Johnson Prime Minister


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

@tobyjugg2

 

How many inquiries were there during and after the last Labour Government ?

 

Seem to remember quite a few.

 

Spit them out them, and how they relate to Johnsons antics  - empty rhetoric is Johnsons technique

 

IN FACT dont bother - lets have something re the Current labour MPs and shadow cabinet

.. and how they relate to the CURRENT Johnson cabinet and party

 

1 hour ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

 

And Corbyn's Labour Party had a few issues, which made then unelectable.  I blame Corbyn for causing Johnson to win an 80 seat majority.

 

As do I

 

 

1 hour ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

 

Keir Starmer has work to complete, to achieve a frontbench team with all of the best people Labour has available. Labour needs to offer am alternative that inspires people to vote for them. And they need to provide this ASAP.

 

perhaps, but do you not agree that its already better than Johnson and his selection - like ress mogg, Nadine Dorries, Handcock renewed or otherwise etc?

 

1 hour ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

 

And Tories need to remove the clown who would still not be funny in a circus.

 

Clowns, starting with Pennywise Johnson

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing yet unc?

 

Let me give you a starter

 

Everything Johnson does is to maintain his position and pay his pals while partying the premiership away - by throwing anyone else under the bus.

 

 

Even the new vaccine center funded by a couple hundred million taxpayers money, touted as a future savior of the UK, is being arranged to be sold to the private sector pals at a loss

and while the UK under Johnson still cant make its own covid tests, and millions more of taxpayer money is routed to VIPal middlemen, and give more taxpayer money for crappy dyson air filters or the kids can just get cold or 'herd immunity aka infected.

 

So Labours plans?

NOT sell of that vaccine production center,

invest in UK production of tests (like Scotland has with PPE)

and invest in better ventilation in schools

 

Starmers labour as bad as Johnson? Bo****s

No contest in Starmers Labours favour it seems to me - ... Still waiting for your justifications to think otherwise.

 

 

WWW.THECHEMICALENGINEER.COM

ENGINEERS have hit out at the UK Government’s reported plans to sell off the country’s emergency vaccine manufacturing facility, cautioning that a...

 

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Labour’s plan for living with Covid

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can imagine it's not a great week to be working in no10. One paper says the mood is terrible and most people are looking for a way out. They also question who would want to work for Johnson now, although I'd have thought being scapegoat should have been priced in already.

 

If it happens, will it lead to even more leaks from disgruntled ex-staff? I've lost count of how many parties we're up to now, is it 15? Anyway, the Mirror have news of another one today.

 

And the populist announcements have started, freeze the TV licence fee and bash the Beeb, plus another go at sending migrants to be processed and/or settled in Rwanda or Ghana. I'm not sure if either of them has agreed to receive people in return for money from the UK government.

 

 

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its another soundbite HB to appease the masses concerned at the rubber boat arrivals.

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 5g covid chop the poles down party

(... No Not Farages anti-Pole stance .. errr .. then again)

 

 

WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM

"The vast majority of Labour supporters want to see a Labour government, that's the whole point in the Labour Party," he said.

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Inveterate Liar says he will swear on oath that other inveterate liar lied

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Email sent by ‘very senior official’ will show prime minister ‘lied to parliament’ ex-chief aide claims

 

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Only dictators make protesting illegal. Think about that."

Lloyd Hardy

 

WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM

"This wouldn't have happened if people hadn't taken to the streets and raised the alarm at the Tories' growing authoritarianism."

 

  • I agree 1

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 17/01/2022 at 09:01, brassnecked said:

Its another soundbite HB to appease the masses concerned at the rubber boat arrivals.

And a futile attempt to distract us from 'work meetings'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 
5eGrmUPp_bigger.jpg
 
·
12h
 
Deeply depressing - our attempt to remove the provisions for mandatory Voter ID have been defeated - so Government succeeds in making it harder for already disenfranchised communities to vote
- a “solution” for a problem (voter fraud) that doesn’t exist #ElectionsBill
 
 
Apparently 1 in 10 UK (ex)voters do NOT have the newly required voter ID
Edited by tobyjugg2

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Although the council has announced cross-party committee to investigate the issue, the fact that all senior councillors have stonewalled questions on the subject has only added to local fury. Residents here feel like their concerns are being ignored by the very people who should be representing them.

 

And, with local elections barely three months away, there is some suggestion Labour and the Greens may end up paying at the ballot box – creating the bizarre possibility that both parties could lose South Yorkshire council seats over a scandal that started with a Tory prime minister."

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Kate Josephs – boss of Sheffield City Council – hosted Whitehall drinks while residents said goodbye to loved ones on iPads. Now crisis...

 

Get rid of her - no dithering

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

  • Like 1

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Lords does good work, but I think anyone who doesn't attend more than 50 times a year AND visibly contribute in a meaningful way should lose it.

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still awaiting @unclebulgaria67support for his claim that 'Labour is as bad as Johnsons .. guv

 

.. or a retraction will do?

Doing a Johnson wont do.

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

@tobyjugg2

 

What have you possibly got against poor old Boris ?  Apart from the difficulty in being factual, PPE VIP fast track lane, some poor decisions on Covid that have caused UK to have Europes highest death toll.

 

All governments have problems.  Labour,   Iraq, Mandleson issues,  Keith Vaz issues, Blair/Brown fued.

 

I am a fan of Tory Blair by the way and thought he was one of our best PM's.  But there were a few mistakes.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find you minimising Johnsons 'issues' and 'failings' so dramatically, nothing short of unconscionable and offensive.

His actions and practices have set the bar so low, things that would have brought shame to almost any prior politician are now everyday events to be covered by excuses and lies ... normalised, with ministers singing the praises of rank abuses

 

I have ALWAYS found the voting decision making process a matter of choosing the 'lessor evil', and sometimes quite hard (eg Johnson V Corbyn)

 

.. so your and SD's considering or at least stating 'they are all as bad as one another' specifically in relation to Johnson and his senior cronies past and present ... aside from selling short 90% of all UK politicians (no matter how self-serving they may have been considered in the past)

Is Beelzebub 'just as bad/no worse' than a mischievous imp?

 

.. how the heck do you reconcile any voting choice .. or dont you vote?

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

and he missed loads .. theres so much you just get lost in Johnsons abuses

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

@tobyjugg2

 

I vote Lib Dem or independent mostly

 

Lib Dems for parish, council and national.  But if there is no Lib Dem candidate, I will support an independent candidate if standing.

 

I did actually vote Labour for the Police commissioner vote.

 

Never voted Tory, as since I have been able to vote, I have never liked their flavour of politics.  A bit too bitter and divisive for my liking.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

@tobyjugg2

 

I vote Lib Dem or independent mostly

 

Lib Dems for parish, council and national.  But if there is no Lib Dem candidate, I will support an independent candidate if standing.

 

I did actually vote Labour for the Police commissioner vote.

 

Never voted Tory, as since I have been able to vote, I have never liked their flavour of politics.  A bit too bitter and divisive for my liking.

 

 

So you don't actually think they are 'all as bad as one another despite declaring it and avoiding retracting it

.. in the 'flavour' of Johnson

So why sping the soundbite commonly used by the supporters of the worst when the worsts abusing is highlighted, in an attempt to 'normalise' and excuse the abuses and antics of the worst?

 

So you see Johnson as 'a flavour of politics' rather than a lying corrupt ****** unfit for office who is corrupting the very basis of British politics .. even with all the cronyism and profiteering aside?

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

This looks bad, whips and spads threatening and blackmailing dissident MPs, especially in Red Wall seats.

 

WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK

Senior Conservative backbencher William Wragg said MPs had faced intimidation over their opposition against the Prime Minister

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems quite clear to me that Johnson, his pal Paterson, and most of Johnsons cabinet are **** utterly in a class of their own.

 

A very few others in the other parties might aspire, but they are rank amateur minnows in the field of being corrupt, lying, self serving **** compared to Johnson et al.

and the tory party has largely accepted and supported that (with a very few exceptions)

 

Even the 'Tory depose Boris the liar crew are very nearly as scummy as him.

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, honeybee13 said:

This looks bad, whips and spads threatening and blackmailing dissident MPs, especially in Red Wall seats.

 

 
WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK

Senior Conservative backbencher William Wragg said MPs had faced intimidation over their opposition against the Prime Minister

 

 

All expected from Johnson

 

and here

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

‘The reports of which I’m aware would seem to constitute blackmail,’ William Wragg warns – saying police should be called in

 

 

They were said to include pulling investment from their constituencies – even in target ‘Red Wall’ seats – or them losing out in boundary shake-ups.

Mr Wragg, the chair of the public administration committee, protested about the tactics as he quizzed Stephen Barclay, the Cabinet Office minister.

 

 

 

 

No more surpising than:

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Questions raised about deal struck in December, as talks with US on steel tariffs begin

 

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the yanks are considering maybe removing some of the trump tariffs that have already been removed from the EU

... in return for everything they want from the UK, including access to NHS patient money, removal of price limits on medicines and access to personal data I hear

 

As he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches pouring out more drinks,

he didn’t realise it was a party - even when he was ambushed by cake and ate it

 

 "Moral emptiness"  "unrepentant and inveterate liar" 

"a liar and a charlatan debasing the office of Prime Minister”

Boris Johnson Mendex est

 

“The failure of the cheerleaders of Brexit to acknowledge the consequences of Brexit as due to Brexit remains remarkable.” - David Schneider

 

Knowledge has only two enemies: Ignorance and lies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...