Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
    • Thanks for your interest dx100. Didn’t reach a hearing. Although they filed court papers, they withdrew a few days beforehand, and admitted it was statute barred and I have it in writing that they say the matter is now closed. Once again, many thanks for all your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parcelhero Broken Item


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1069 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Evening

 

Used Parcelhero to deliver a Cast Iron potato chipper, like a fool paid for the extra insurance and stated that the item was over 20kg when it was only 15kg

Recipient informs with pictures that the item had been delivered broken.

Applied to Parcelhero for compensation

After a few email to Parcelhero with picture evidence they refused compensation stating the packaging did not meet the desired specifications

 

Where do I stand now?

 

thanks

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they say that the packaging did not meet the desired specifications. What do you want to say about that?

Maybe you could post up a photograph in PDF format.

Which courier service was it?

You've been here a long time so I expect that you are already fairly familiar with the Hermes sub- forums here. Whichever courier service it was, the story will probably broadly the same.

You haven't told us what the value of this item was. Was the value correctly declared?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my email I stated that the driver could have refused collection if it wasn't packed correctly, also to have broken such an item it would have had to have been dropped from a great height.

It was Parcel Force who collected the item.

I will look at the Hermes Sub Forum

Yes declared it was £75 and asked for £75

 

Many thanks

Parcelhero.pdf

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the external packaging intact? How might they have discerned that it was not correctly packed?

What photographs did you send them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The buyer said the packaging was broken.

I have attached photos of the item before despatch and photos sent from the buyer of the broken item

also their packaging criteria

 

many thanks

 

Parcel Hero #3.pdf Parcelhero #2.pdf

Edited by webbscatering

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. But I understand that you sent photographs to the delivery company . Is that right? What photographs did you send them

Link to post
Share on other sites

my apologies BF, I have not sent any photos to Parcel Force the delivery company been dealing directly with Parcelhero.

Bar a few I sent them pretty much what's posted here.

cheers

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I meant Parcelhero. My mistake.

So you sent them all of those photographs. Why did you send those photographs? Did they criticise the packaging before they receive the photos or after they received photos?
 

I expect that we can help you get your money back but I would like it to be made easy rather than difficult.

What troubles me is that the pictures you have shown of the packaging show a box which to my eye seems to be made of quite flimsy cardboard – but more importantly, this is to be very little evidence of any packing to protect the machine that is inside it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning, 

I believe most of the packaging was discarded by the buyer who had gone back into the skip to pull out what she could. The item was wrapped in packing film the stuff they use to wrap pallets in before it was packed up.

That was the first thing they asked was evidence of damage to the box, so the buyer took these pictures and sent them to me, which I passed on to the company.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that you haven't done yourself any favours. Did you include any note to the effect that this was not all of the packaging?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm afraid that's a Big Fail then. You can't blame them for thinking that the packaging was inadequate – and we will have to work our way around it.

Did they ask you for photographs of the packaging?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appreciate the help, here is the email sent when I first instigated the claim:-

Siraj Adrian Tamang (ParcelHero®) 

14 May 2021, 10:33 BST 

Dear,

I am really sorry that your parcel has been damaged during transit, I will do everything I can to help you submit a claim for the damaged items.

First, we need to assess the level of damage to the packaging and the items inside your shipment, and we do this by reviewing photos of the damage.

Occasionally we may also need to arrange a physical damage inspection of the items and packaging, in order to process your claim.

Please do not move the damaged parcel from the delivery location or discard any of the packaging materials, as it may affect your claim.

Secondly, please submit the following information to support your claim within 14 calendar days of the delivery of your item (The date of delivery being considered as day 1)

  1. Clear images of: 
    a. The external packaging, and especially any visible damages to this material. 
    b. The internal packaging (showing how each item was packaged), including
    any damage caused.
    c. Any damage to the item/s inside the parcel.

  2. Any other supporting documentation or information you wish to provide to 
    support your claim (for example; if the goods were packaged in the original
    manufacturers packaging this information is very useful to support your claim)

I will then review the evidence you send me, and respond within 7 working days to confirm if a physical damage inspection will be required.

Then what?
1. If a physical inspection of your goods is required, it can take up to 14 days to arrange for your goods to be collected, examined and then returned to you.
2. If the packaging is found to be sufficient and we accept your claim, we will send you a claim form which you must return to us within 7 days.
3. Once we receive the completed claim form back, it will then take up to 14 days for us to process your claim and issue payment.

Once again, I’d like to extend my sincere apologies to you and assure you that we take every claim very seriously. At ParcelHero® we are committed to providing the very best service possible and this starts by only working with the best global carriers in the world, and it ends with dedicated customer care when you need our support.

I will move forward with your claim as soon as I receive your images, and I will do everything I can to ensure this matter is resolved to your satisfaction

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely

Siraj Adrian Tamang
ParcelHero® Claims Department

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they specifically ask you not to discarded packaging. As an important part of the packaging was already discarded, then frankly you shouldn't have provided them with any images at all and you should have told them that it was too late as the packaging had already been disposed of. As I have already said, you haven't helped yourself. Not even to the extent of informing them that the majority of the internal packing had already been discarded by the customer.

Because of this you've put yourself in a difficult position.
Are there signs of any damage to the box itself – in other words to the external packaging? When the box arrived at your customer, was it immediately noticeable that the box had been damaged?
Maybe you can provide pictures of the exterior of the box – particularly showing any damage.


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I see even the purchaser seems to be a bit unhappy with your packaging. You had better not send that message to PH

 

Does your purchaser still have the item? And are they still up for taking it off your hands for half price?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they still have it and still up for taking it off my hands. I’m not sure that I’m entirely to blame for the packaging, when it left me the driver was happy it was sufficiently packed, on a previous occasion the very same driver refused to take something because he’s wasn’t packed to the correct standard. Ever since I have packed everything correctly. So from leaving me to the buyer something happened to the packing and item, more than likely dropped. 
thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in that case, seeing that you have pretty well done everything you possibly could to harm your position, short of showing them your willy , I would suggest that you mitigate your loss by accepting the offer which has been made by the purchaser and then set about recouping the balance from PH.

I would respond to PH, we can figure out a form of words regarding the packaging – but it will be broadly the argument which I have suggested above and frankly is pretty well identical to the comments that your purchaser made in respect of the mishandling of this item.

I'd put it to PH that as a gesture of goodwill to them, you are prepared to settle for £45 that you are prepared to take a legal action if they won't play.

See what they say. Hopefully they'll come back with a counter proposal of about £30 or £35 – but if not then we'll help you send a letter of claim if you want and I can't imagine that they are going to put up much of a fight to save just a few quid. You might have to issue the claim and it might end up going to mediation but at mediation you could then agree to accept 40 quid or so plus your court expenses which would make you quits.
By securing some kind of compromise from you they will feel that they have gained some Face.

If this approach doesn't appeal to you then we'll certainly help you bring an action for the lot but it seems to me that this is a slicker way to deal with it



 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll give it a miss to be honest, I’ve got a lot more going on than to worry about 37.50, I’ll put it down to “every days a school day”. 
Thanks for your help BF as always invaluable and knowledgeable.

  • Thanks 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...