Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • hey your doing fine, stop sweating, it's really no big deal, you need to understand you are what is classed as 'a litigant in person' - meaning joe public against what can be seen as a somewhat daunting judicial system, that is too your advantage.   IMHO thats just a reprint of your defence, it might be better to structure around something like this, whos basis is around the WS in the thread i pointed too.         WITNESS STATEMENT OF DEFENDANT XXXXXXXXXXXX CLAIM NO. XXXXXXXX                                                                                                                                   Defendant: XXXXXXX                                                                                                                               Date XX/XXX2019 IN THE COUNTY COURT AT                                                                               CLAIM NO:XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     BETWEEN     XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      CLAIMANT     AND XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     DEFENDANT    1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed ...10p to 15p in the £1 and which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Idem Capital securities issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.    2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   I accept I have in the past had financial dealings with {insert original creditor name]. That being a Loan Agreement . I do not recall the precise details of the agreement but do recall it was on or about the year xxxx.   After seeking advice this led me to check all paperwork I held with creditors, from this I could not find any Credit Agreement relating to the account the claimant is referring to.   I have therefore sought clarification and requested copies of the agreements from the claimant by way of a section 77 request    exhibits   (DOC 1) A CPR 31.14 request pursuant to sec 61 B of the CCA1974 was sent xx/xx/xxxx via Royal Mail signed for and shows as received xx/xx/xxxx. Request for the following :   1.a copy of the default notice served under section 87 of the consumer credit act 3. Notice of assignment 4. A statement of account   (DOC 1A) To date NO default notice been produced.    (DOC 2) A Section 77 request was sent on xx/xx/xxxx via royal mail signed for and shows as received xx/xx/xxx. The claimant to date has failed to comply to my Section 77 request.   the defendant has failed to produce a copy of the Default notice issued by the original creditor,  as far as I can recall any breach with the original creditor would have been on or around xxxx.   The claimant as an assignee would not be able to legally issue a Default Notice as the debt would have already been terminated before assignment.   (DOC 3) I sort clarity of any Default Notice by the way of a CPR 31.14 request, sent via Royal mail signed for on xx/xx/xxxx and shows as received signed for xx/xx/xxxx   The claimant has still yet to comply to my CPR 31.14 request with regard to clarity of any valid default notice issued, as yet I have never received an original or seen a copy of a valid default notice from the defendant.   Conclusion   I contest that the documents I have received do not meet the requirements and prescribed terms of a legal binding credit agreement, and that the claimant has acknowledged that they are unable to produce an agreement and are unable to enforce litigation action.     I also state NO VALID Default has been produced from the claimant.   I believe that the that the facts stated in the witness state are true   ..................   have you received the claimants witness statement yet...   the above is just musings...    
    • A shortage of drivers has disrupted supply chains and fuel deliveries, with vehicles queuing for petrol.View the full article
    • Hannah Peel wore a sustainable dress to the Mercury Awards - but is the fashion industry changing?View the full article
    • Hi I know you are a busy site but I have posted the last few very important messages as I will be in court in the next few weeks   as you can see time is of essence and I have had few cryptic replies of look for your self messages which I have tried to work out about new guidance on statement of truths but this is not something that I am familiar with   yes I understand this site is not here to spoon feed everyone but sometimes it feels like a cap in hand approach. I have not had any feedback as to whether my statement is going to stand or if it will be thrown away by the judge?   I wish I had the knowledge of all you guys that assist everyone in their time of need who ask for the guidance that is readily available here but unfortunately it’s not the case sorry.   If anyone could advise on my post it will be very much appreciated.   Thanks G
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Car Hub Birmingham LTD T/A Car Central - what should I do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 129 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 Hi, hope you can help.

 

I bought my daughter a car two months ago for £3500, paid on a credit card. I should have gone with my gut feeling and walked away, however we had travelled a fair distance. I have asked for a refund or for them to pay for the repair – especially the oil pressure issue. So, far they have not said yes, or no.

 

I have bought another car for her, so either way this one is going. However, morally I couldn’t sell it with a intermittent oil pressure problem.  

 

I suspect they are going to be tricky to deal with.

 

I have listed the points below.

 

  • The car was supposed to have a professional valet. It was just jet washed, the interior was still filthy.
  • A scratch on the video, I was told it was just the light – it wasn’t.
  • The logbook apparently was at Head Office, then in April it had been sent to DVLA, then in May I was told it was lost and I needed to fill in a V62 and pay £25.00. What version is the truth? I still do not have the logbook.
  • April, the  Alternator  failed £300, of which £200 was covered under warranty.
  • May, fanbelt broken towed to the garage £168
  • May -  oil pressure – stop engine warning light. I have not used the car since.
  • We were told the cambelt was changed at 65,000 miles . This is incorrect, our local garage has confirmed it has not been changed – but needs to be.
  • Water ingress in both headlights and water leaks out of the door. We were told this was because it had been jet washed. Two months on the car has not been jet washed, the lights are full of water.
  • On the sales invoice it states 75000 miles it was 78000 miles, this was verified by MOT’s

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may well become very relieved you paid by credit card, as one of the hurdles associated with enforcing your rights will become easier: enforcement (due to Section 75 protection)

 

This is because (if you HADN’T paid between £100 and £30k by credit card) there would have been the risk of winning a court claim against the dealer but it being a hollow victory if there are no assets to enforce against OR the dealer folds a limited company and resurrects a different company.

 

However, under S.75 protection the credit card company is equally liable as the dealer.

 

So, you need to establish what outcome you want, and if it is realistic - how to achieve it - if need be by court action, naming both the dealer and credit card company as joint defendants. If it gets that far, and your claim succeeds, then the credit card company pays up, and it is up to them to get their money back from the dealer.

 

Your first step will be to write to the dealer, setting out what you want. If that doesn’t work then you speak to your credit card company, followed (if need be) by sending a letter before action / letter before claim to BOTH.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Paul, any reason why you're not naming the dealer? Are you trying to protect them?

When you write to them you should make it clear that you are asserting your right under the consumer rights act and you are giving them a single opportunity to carry out a repair or else you want a refund.

If you look at other threads involving dodgy second-hand cars that I've contributed to, you will see that I have often pointed out that we have a lot of people complaining about second-hand cars that they have bought – normally cheaply – but at a great distance.

For some reason or other people spot a car maybe 150 – 200 – 300 miles away and for some reason or other they think this is the only car for them and it is a must-have.

They travel great distances to collect the car, then they end up buying it partly because they've been to so much trouble to go and see it – and they never factor in the cost of having to have the card dealt with if it suddenly demonstrated defect – or even breaks down completely, the cost of having it transported to a reluctant dealer and then maybe having to leave it there for several days when it gets repaired and then having to travel back and pick it up again.

Sounds as if you've done the same thing.
This is not only for your benefit but also for the benefit of other people who read this thread.

Frankly the best thing you can do is to get shot of it – but you will probably have difficulty getting the dealer to give you a refund.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, sorry – a bit like closing the stable door, I know – but I try to get the word around whenever I can.

Anyway, how can we deal with this?

In addition to asserting your right, and on the basis that it's going to be difficult to get a refund, you might want to start getting an independent assessment of all of the defects and the cost of repairing them.

If at the end of the day they refuse a refund – then probably easier to sue for the cost of repairs and then sell the car on.

If you did have to bring an action, you could sue for a refund or cost of repairs – at your option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Car Hub Birmingham LTD T/A Car Central - what should I do?

They have refused a refund, stating it's after 30 days.

 

However, I think they want me to go away.

 

Repair to fix everything locally £750, I would accept 50% of that then I can sell the car and not feel bad. I would lose about £500 selling it privately - but at least it okay.

 

Or they take the car back and refund me £3000. They are really bad news, they stated it's my fault for buying a car 100 miles away!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have some sympathy with the fact that you shouldn't have bought a car 100 miles away – but that doesn't affect the legalities.

You say that you would be prepared to accept 50% but I don't see why you should have to. And if you are going to attack them then you should attack them for all of it and not simply a reduced amount. It's the same effort. The same logistical problems of bringing an action. The same logistical problems of enforcement.

I'm sure that they don't expect a rapid assertive response – and so I think that's exactly what you should do.

I would send them a letter of claim and demand a refund as they have refused an opportunity to repair. Tell them that if they are prepared to repair it then you are prepared to give them a chance but they will have to make arrangements to collect the car because it is not driveable and if they won't do that then you will start an action within 14 days and without any further notice.

You know how it goes

 

I would add in the letter that if they do opt to repair the vehicle then the repair must be completed within seven days of collection of it or else once again, you will simply sue them.

They need to understand that there is no mucking around here.

I expect this is the kind of company that is used to dealing with people who don't really know their way around and are hesitant about taking action. It's probably about time somebody delivered a lesson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much. I have some homework to do, this company is the epitome of a dodgy car dealer!!!

Do I have to get the work do before taking action against them?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you don't know whether they are going to do a refund if you sue them for that.

Frankly I think that you may as well simply go for the refund and see what happens. If there is a hearing then it will be heard at your local court – if it's not online – assuming you get judgement then you can put the High Court enforcement officers in. They don't really look like a company that is going to suddenly go away.

I think I would simply write to them and tell them that you want to repair but they will have to collect the car and they have seven days to do it – or you want a refund in which case there will also have to arrange to collect the car and that if they refuse then you will see them in the County Court.

If they refuse the repair then they have given up their entitlement under the consumer rights act to carry out a single repair and so the only option will be for them to make the refund.

I think once you can show the court that you gave them the opportunity under the 2015 Act to carry out repair and they refused, the court will be happy to give you a judgement in favour of a refund.
Where is the car now? It seems to me that if the car is not working then you could reasonably start levying a storage charge as well.
You would add interest to the judgement sum and with storage charges you might well come out at four grand.

Of course bear in mind that there is always a slight risk that they might have some way of saying that their assets belong to somebody else and there is nothing to enforce against – but if that is the view that they will take, then although you may not be able to recover your court costs, you won't of lost anything more in at least you will have tried.

Presumably they have a forecourt with cars on it et cetera. They aren't working out on the street or keeping their cars in the car park
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I would spell out the timeline for them.

I think I would get in 14 days or else you will sue. Tell them that the 14 days give them enough time to collect the vehicle, to repair it within seven days and then to return the vehicle and this means that if you do not have a fully working vehicle back at your address by the end of the 14 days then you will simply go ahead and issue.

Tell them that this is not subject to any discussion or negotiation. Tell them that if they refuse or if they simply failed to respond, this will be taken as an indication that they are giving up their entitlement to carry out a repair and it will be on that basis that you will be suing for a full refund plus interest plus also at the expiry the 14 days you start levying a storage charge of, say, £10 per day (I feel that this is a very modest amount for the storage of a vehicle).

Link to post
Share on other sites

BF : bought on credit card, within the limits allowing S.75 liability.

 

Any County Court claim (if it got that far!) should be with the credit card co. as a joint defendant.

 

Enforce (if need be!) against the c c co. & let them seek indemnity against the dealer.

 

The c c co. may well settle before then.

 

The hurdle isn’t enforcement here, but showing liability / obtaining judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there's any need to involve the credit card company at the moment. No point in making them an adversary as well.

Get a judgement and then if the judgement can't be enforced, claim against the credit card company. If there is a judgement then credit card company won't cause you any trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...