Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver.  (Although earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.  I don't clearly understand it, but legal advice was something to do with the role the receiver has acting as an agent for the borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against the receiver ???).  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate app for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EVRi lost my package - court claim issued ***Settled in Full***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was going to send this back

 

Good afternoon Ilyas,

 
As stated previously in my letter of claim dated the 25th of May, under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act of 1999, I have the right to claim this compensation directly with yourselves. You have again denied me this right.
 
Tomorrow the 8th of June will mark the 14th day for you to try and resolve this.
 
If Hermes have not issued me a total refund of £161 by close of play tomorrow I will be going ahead on the 9th of June and opening a case with the small claims court to recover the funds that way.
 
Regards
Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I've had a look at it – and that's fine.

Sorry about the delay but I was using a device and I couldn't read it properly and I wanted to doublecheck.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they're certainly sticking to their guns. I'll make the claim through money claim tomorrow.

 

Dear ,
 
Thank you for getting in touch with us regarding parcel xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
 
I am sorry that you are not happy with the response unfortunately, as this was sent through Packlink and not Hermes directly you would need to contact them for a claim.
 
I do apologise for the inconvenience caused.
 
Kind Regards
 
Sarah Gregson
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Dear Sarah

You know and I know that under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 that I have full third party rights to sue you instead of Packlink.  
If you don't know this then you better have a word with somebody about your staff development because you should know.
If you do know then shame on you for trying to pull the wool over the eyes of your customers.
I'll be issuing proceedings tomorrow

Good luck

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the last response from them. I'm just about to write up the short statement required on money service, can you read it over before I send it BankFodder?

 

Good Afternoon
 
Thank you for getting in touch regarding the recent parcel delivery reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
 
My name is Tasawar and I respond to complaints on behalf of the Executive Office. I have been asked to follow up your complaint in the absence of my colleague.
 
Firstly, I would like to start by offering my apologies on behalf of Hermes upon hearing that your recipient has not received the parcel.
 
Can I please advise as per your contractual agreement you will need to raise this matter further with Packlink as your contractual agreement is with them and not Hermes. Hermes is in a contractual agreement with Packlink who contracted us to complete this delivery.
 
As you have advised that you will be taking further legal action all future correspondence will need to be made in writing from your legal team to the below address.
 
Legal department
Hermes Parcelnet Ltd
Capitol House
1 Capitol Close
Morley
LS27 0WH
 
I would like to advise I will now be closing down this complaint and allow for you to proceed further via the legal team.
 
Again I sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused.
 
Kind regards,
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, issue the claim – but everything should have been prepared by now especially the particulars of claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to put any further details than this BankFodder?

 

Hermes incident ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Parcel ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

On the 25/04/2021 I sold an Xbox One S to the value of £161 on eBay and used Packlink to send the item via Hermes.

 

The package was picked up from the collection point and scanned by Hermes, after this point I no longer received any updates.

 

01/05/2021 I contacted Packlink and they advised I should submit a lost item claim, I submitted this with Packlink on the 04/05/21.

 

06/05/21 Packlink contacted me to advise the item had been deemed as lost and that I would only receive standard compensation (£20) as I had not paid for the additional compensation.

 

12/05/21 I then contacted Hermes directly to request full compensation of the loss of the package as they had not fulfilled their contractual obligation of delivering the package.

 

13/05/21 they contacted me to say after an extensive search of the depot the package could not be found.

 

15/05/21 Hermes called me and advised they hadn’t actually searched the depot and would do so.

 

19/05/21 I was contacted again advising after an extensive search they could not find the item.

 

25/05/21 I issued a letter of claim to Hermes for a total refund of the £161 for the loss of the item.

 

26/05/21 Hermes contacted me to advise they would do another search of the warehouse.

 

07/06/21 Hermes declared that they had received no response from the hub team and that the package was deemed lost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

The claimant used the defendant's delivery service to send an item value £161 to a UK address. Defendant' s reference number XXX. The defendant lost the item. The claimant is suing on the basis of the Contracts (Rights of Third Party) Act 1999 as a beneficial third party. The court is invited to exercise its powers under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 to examine the fairness or otherwise of the defendant's terms and conditions with particular reference to their requirement that it is the customer who must purchase insurance to protect themselves against the defendant's own negligence or criminality of their employees.   The claimant seeks reimbursement of £161+ £XXX delivery costs plus interest.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey Bankfodder, just an update. Hermes acknowledged my claim and said they would defend the claim on the 16th of this month, still heard nothing from them, I think they have 28 days to file a defence so I’m sure they’ll wait til as late as they can.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey Bankfodder, I've got my notice of proposed allocation to the small claims track as Hermes has defended the claim, I'm fine with everything else on the N180 form (ticked yes for mediation) the only problem I have is the fact that it's asking for a local county court, but I'm in Scotland and we don't have county courts. Do you have any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm putting up a call to my site team colleague @Andyorch

 

Please will you put up the defence in PDF format. It's probably the same as the rest of them but you never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thanks. The usual rubbish trying to pass the buck onto pack link even though they are fully aware of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.

Hermes usual abuse and unfair treatment of their customers and as usual simply exploiting our excellent County Court service which comes them free of charge in order to frustrate your legitimate claim.

Stick by your guns.

When it goes to mediation, stand your ground. Read up the mediation stories on this sub- forum and let us know when you get the mediation date

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I did feel like they're just trying to spin it out as much as possible to see if I'll drop it but there's no chance of that. As much as I'd like to get my money back it's more about the principal of it and the fact they think they can get away with it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

the only problem I have is the fact that it's asking for a local county court, but I'm in Scotland and we don't have county courts.

 

On the DQ N180...leave it blank  MCOL will allocate it to the defendants court ...I assume you have no desire to attend and offer your evidence pursuant to CPR 27.9

 

Its important you submit your evidence with a cover note once you get the courts directions and refer to CPR 27.9 that you will not be in attendance but will rely on papers alone.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part27#27.9

 

 

Andy

 

 

.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi all,

 

I know it's been a while but that's because I've pretty much been waiting patiently for the case to go to mediation as money claim told me that's what was going to happen.

I called money claim last month and found out it should have definitely went to mediation by now and they said they'd sort it, however instead they've transferred it to the court, so I've had a letter asking me to set out the basis of bringing a claim in the UK courts and I have 14 days to reply.

I really didn't expect it to go to court, I expected a resolution through mediation so I don't even know where to begin with this now.

 

Thanks

Edited by toyschoketoys
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please would you post a letter here .

 

Also, it will be very helpful if you wouldn't make your posts in a solid block of text .

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

The claimants claim is based on the defendants breach of contract .

The defendant is a courier company which agreed to carry a parcel belonging to the claimant to a UK address .

The parcel contained a XXX and the value was declared at £xxx.

The defendants tracking number was XXX and the parcel will send on xxx date

The defendant has filed a defence to the claim and their only defence is that there was no contract between me and them .

This is correct. I used a parcel broker called packlink .

However, I am suing the defendant as an entitled third party under the contract open ( rights of third parties) act.

This act of parliament gives me as a named beneficiary or within a discernible class of beneficiaries, the rights to bring a action for breach of contract as if I was a direct contracting partner .

Therefore, I respectfully suggest that I have a statutory right to bring my action for breach of contract against the defendant .

The defendant has not defended on any other issues .

I would respectfully submit that if the court agrees that I am entitled as a third party to bring this action as if I was a direct contracting party, then judgement must be given to me as the defendant has not raised any other issues in their defence .

Statement of truth.

Signed.

Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quote

 

 

Quote

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...