Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/Cohen claimform - old overdraft


GY-UK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 879 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi - for the student overdraft account we got a letter through saying they have not had a response from the original creditor (this is when we asked for CCA and payment details  - this was over a year ago). They said they have temporarily stopped action whilst they wait for a resolution. Should they be able to log this on a credit file still?

 

In regards to the credit card CCA, I will look at uploading it in a PDF (partner has had family stuff going on) - I assume there's a redaction guide in the link you gave as well?

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Yes I think both are stat barred its over 6 years. What would our next steps be, send a SAR to Lloyds regarding the credit card payments?

 

In regards to the overdraft, Robbersway haven't provided any evidence or information in regards to it and have a default on credit file, what should we do to fix that?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send robbersway our SB letter from the debt collection section of our library.

 

whats the date of the default on the OD?

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OD, we asked for CCA and evidence over a year ago and they've only recently come back and said they have no info from Lloyds.... however, they have somehow deduced the default was 11th March 2016. How have they determined that when they admit they have no info?

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRA? you mean CCA? 

you can't CCA an OD

forget what the dca says totally

what does your credit file say

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a debt buyer can't change the defaulted date or more correctly, for an OD, the date the original creditor sent you a Notice served under 76(1) and 98(1) of the CCA1974 Demand /Recall Notice.

 

and if your last use of the OD or payment was several months if not years before that was registered you have a case against lloyds to possibly get that rectified

 

how are gauging the defaulted date has been 'updated?, ignore the calendar section of any credit report that might show D, thats immaterial. its the the date next too defaulted date XXXXX in the debt summary is the important one.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the credit file there's a start date for the OD account, a default date (11/03/2016) and an "updated to" date (14/03/2021).

 

This info from Hoist/Robbersway according to Experian they said they can't guarantee the accuracy of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the updated date is immaterial.

your online credit file should hold payment info too if you are lucky?

does it?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

darn.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - uploaded the info.

 

Do we need to SB Robbers about the OD then? They took over a year to come back and say they had nothing so will be interesting.

 

Are they allowed to add a default to credit file when they have no info to base that on? Experian shrugging their shoulders which is nothing new. Robbers clearly in the wrong here.

GY-UK.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok that makes things clearer.

 

they aren't adding a (problematic) default, they are simply updating the status in the calendar section with what the OC place there, which really means nor changes anything and is what they are allowed to do as the new owner.

 

the registered defaulted date is the important bit, and the fact the OC LLoyds , failed to default in a timely manner.

 

now there was a later change by the ICO in the rules, but for 2014, your last payment date , they should have served, under 76(1) and 98(1) of the CCA1974, a Demand /Recall Notice within 3-6mth, that has legs for you.

 

lets get the data from the lloyds SAR and we'll p'haps move this OD FWD.

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

an sar is for everything an org holds on you!.

read it

 

click sar

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

following as l have a old lloyds cc. even older than your and have paid nothing since 2012. Tho earlier this year after re checking my credit file for the first time in 2 years l started having phone calls and letters. 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Hoist finance UK holdings

 Date of issue – 05 May 2021

 

Particulars of Claim

 What is the claim for – 

1.The Claim is for the sum of £2291 in respect of monies owing pursuant to an overdraft facility under bank account no.<redacted>

2. The debt was legally assigned by Lloyds Bank (EX LLOYDS TSB) to the Claimant and notice has been served.

3.The defendant has failed to repay overdrawn sums owing under the terms and conditions of the bank account. 

  4.The claimant claims

  1. The sum of £2291
  2. Costs

 

What is the total value of the claim? 

 

Account Claimed £2291

Court Fee – £105.00

Legal representation - £80
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No (did inform Lloyds, not Hoist)

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Overdraft
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after 
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In branch
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser has issued claim
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Started receiving communications in 2019
 

Why did you cease payments? Last payment was in 2014 to Lloyds. I was unable to make payments as I had just finished my studies and wasn’t working. The account was then removed from my online banking and I had no access online or in branch. The next correspondence I received was from Robinsons Way/Hoist asking for payment 2019.

 

In addition, I responded to Robinsons Way/Hoist requesting the CCA on 19/02/2020. Hoist then sent correspondence on 23/02/2021 that Lloyds were unable to provide this documentation and that until Hoist received further information from Lloyds, they would temporarily cease action on the account whilst Hoist “waited for a resolution”. I have not received an update since then (except for this claim).

 

What was the date of your last payment? 2014
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter a debt management plan? No

 

Background:

 

  • Student account overdraft with Lloyds
  • Last payment made was in 2014
  • Robinsons Way/Hoist contacted in late 2019
  • Asked for CCA 19th February 2020
    • Received communication stating they were trying to obtain CCA 23rd February 2021 
    • Robinsons Way/Hoist said they would cease action until they obtained information from Lloyds
  • Heard nothing from Robinsons Way/Hoist until the CCJ claim
  • Despite the lack of relevant information from Lloyds as per the above, Robinsons Way/Hoist marked the account as defaulted on credit file 11th March 2016 
    • No idea how they came up with this date if they don't have necessary paperwork from Lloyds

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Hoist/Cohen claimform - old overdraft

go file the sb defence as with your other thread.

RW didn't default you Lloyds did on or before sale

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. For the CC SB defence we had the last payment date, but don't have one for the OD. I only know it was 2014 (is it okay to state 2014 or do I need a date?). No information was provided by Hoist. I have sent a SAR to Lloyds, they have acknowledged but have not sent the info yet.

 

Do I mention the fact that there was no CCA or any information provided by Hoist in regards to the original debt - also they said the account has no further action until they get this info?

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCa is not applicable to OD's as said above 

why don't you go ring Lloyds and ask?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @dx100uk, sorry thought I had replied to this. We submitted the defence the same day you posted (11th May).

 

Re Lloyds, partner went into branch two years ago as she needed statements for referencing purposes and she asked about the student overdraft account to see if she could resolve (had just started working again) and they had no records to provide to her apparently. 

 

Still waiting for the SAR info from Lloyds to come through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Topic open.

 

Andy

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @Andyorch - I received this letter in the post (picture at the moment as I'm not at home, I had to get someone to take a pic) along with thirty-odd pages of statements/transactions for some reason. I was concerned when I read the "Judge's order" as I thought there had been a hearing which we weren't aware of, but it looks like an amendment to the claim?

hoist-letter.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you  not get a copy of the judges order?

what has happened since you filed sb defence your last post?

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...