Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
    • Thanks very much Bank. I've now done a lot of reading and have drafted my Letter of Claim as attached. I look forward to your comments. 16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Link & Old Co-Op Student Overdraft debt. Statute barred?


Paydayhostage
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 994 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have an overdraft debtor of approx. £1,500.0 with the Coop. The Overdraft itself was taken out with a pre 2014 Student account and the account/overdraft have not been used since sometime in 2015 since when I reached the limit and stopped paying anything into the account (I use a different bank as my main account).

 

I was provided the overdraft when I had no actual income (as a student) and disclosed to their Collections Department that I had dropped out of university due to mental health issues (which is true).

 

I believe I may have had some contact with the Coop bank in 2016 where I talked about my (in)ability to pay it back. Does this mean I would have to wait until 2022 for it to be statute barred? I haven't had any contact from any DCA so I don't believe the debt has been sold on and the bank still sends me generic marketing and update emails. To be blunt, am I going to get away with not paying this back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

statute barred from the date of YOUR last use or payment.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for the response.

 

I've just checked my credit file and it was sold to Link Financial back in 2018 with no defaults registered on the Coop debt but defaults were registered on the 'new' debt.

 

I've emailed them, playing dumb that I don't recognise the debt so that I can update my contact details and avoid a backdoor CCJ.

 

It seems bizarre they haven't even attempted court action given the amount and age of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not odd really. Just think about the number of debts that have existed in the UK since 2014. Millions of different types of debt.

 

Do you think an overdraft debt for a student is going to be a priority debt to try to enforce repayment?  This type of debt is most likely categorised as low value/low priority with very little chance of any payment being received. No point in spending money on court fees, if the debtor may only pay £1 a week, if they are lucky. And at that rate with admin costs, they would be making a loss.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Link & Old Co-Op Student Overdraft debt. Statute barred?

link will sit on this until it nears SB status to wrack up interest and then try a backdoor CCJ hoping you've moved.

good job you've now updated them..!!

ensure the same for any other debts

never run from debt for the sake of a 2nd class stamp!!

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get an sar off to the co-op

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

A strange turn of events with this one. I advised Link that I did not recognise the debt. They interpreted this as a complaint and have now replied (last few days)  with the following:

 

"...As you are stating that you are not our customer, I am very limited to the amount of information which I am
able to divulge to you in accordance with General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and the Data
Protection Act 2018.
Having taken all aspects of your dispute into consideration, I have taken the relevant action to prevent you
from receiving any further communication from our organisation in this regard; therefore, you can consider
this matter as closed.
I trust this letter satisfies your dispute. However, if I am able to assist you further, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
OVERALL RESPONSE:
Based on the above, I wish to clarify that your dispute has been upheld. As such, we believe a reasonable
explanation has now been provided and your dispute has now been closed."

 

However, they also sent an email back in May that said the following:

 

"Thank you for your email we can confirm this is regarding your Co-operative Bank account. This account was opened on [redacted]  and defaulted on [redacted date in last few years]. This account was assigned to ourselves Link Financial Outsourcing Limited on the [redacted date in last few years] . Your balance as of today’s date is [approx £1500] . We can confirm the last payment made towards this account was on [ redacted date in last few years] for the sum of [£small]

 

We would like to discuss your income and expenditure information in order to agree a repayment arrangement in line with your affordability.

The easiest way to complete an affordability assessment is to register your account online at https://link.ldmsportal.com/. Here you can view your transactions, complete an income and expenditure form, set-up a direct debit and send us a message.

Once an affordability assessment is completed, we will review and be in touch via email."

 

Am I correct to believe the supposed overdraft debt of approx £1500 is now null and void? Thanks in advance.

Edited by Paydayhostage
Link to post
Share on other sites

which is why we never advise entering into pointless letter tennis with a dca...esp by email.

shame you replied without asking us 1st.

 

as long as you have informed them of your correct and correct address in WRITING 

yours is not the next move.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What have I lost by speaking to them though? The only contact was to ask for more info and that I didn't recognise the debt.

 

Thanks, I'll let it lie for now, then. I take it their statement that it's closed and  there'll be no more " communication from our organisation in this regard" doesn't actually mean I'll never be chased for it again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i most certainly would not ever trust link as far as i could kick them.

 

ensure you don't move within 6yrs without informing all your debt owners in writing.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...