Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aviva fraudulently processed my data without authorisation o


Titchytitch
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 680 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No point in making any further complaint to the police.

I think you are already starting to understand that the ombudsman won't help you, the independent assessor won't help you, the police won't help you.

None of this is surprising.

You will have to go it alone.

Write out your own statement explaining why this story of a verbal agreement must be untrue.
Get your husband to do the same thing – independently.
I understand that you may have a cousin to whom your elder brother has already said that he had no idea what was going on with the insurance. Try and get a statement or recording of him saying that or an exchange of SMS messages.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Test only please ignore..

 

 

Gick try now.. regards dx

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx, all seems fine now!

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

:yo:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Titchytitch What would be the grounds for your complaint ?

 

They have investigated and decided that they do not have enough evidence to put to prosecutors.

 

Only worth going back to the Police, if you have further evidence that they have not considered.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

@unclebulgaria67 they were meant to take a statement from my hubby who was supposedly meant to be present during this verbal agreement and the extended family member to whom Mr Z had provided the screen shot of payment made and his recording admitting he had paid the insurance  she didn't speak 5o him either for a statement 

 

The investigating officer was on annual leave from 27th Sept-13th oct Mr z was arrested 21/09 and interviewed 22/09 . They are saying avuva believe there was a verbal agreement hes my brother not my husband he claimed to be my husband 

 

I asked the officer how he isn't being charged for defrauding a company she replied Aviva don't believe they have been a victim of fraud which is absurd??

 

The supervisor said of I wanted to put a complaint in I can and it will be reviewed independently so I was thinking of complaining on how the case had been handled the investigating officer was on annual leave and she came back and decided there's no further action purely based on the fact my eldest brother gave a false statement saying the verbal agreement was made in his presence since when has a verbal agreement been a base for a case ? There was no agreement made and the officer never took statements of my hubby or cousin even though she said she would 

 

I was thinking to put a complaint in for the record really 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police investigate.

if they believe an offence has taken place they pass it to the CPS for a decision on if to prosecute / charge the person with the offence.

 

The CPS “charging standard” is two-fold:

a) that the prosecution has a “realistic prospect” of success, while

 b) prosecution is in the public interest.

 

Don’t forget that the required standard of proof for a criminal prosecution is “beyond all reasonable doubt”.

 

You need to enquire if the case was passed to the CPS or if a decision it shouldn’t go to the CPS was made….. to determine if you complain to the police, the CPS, or both.

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

@BazzaS they said they believe there's insufficient evidence as it's all word of mouth and hear say even though they have clear evidence ge has made use of the insurance he has controlled the policy companies have said hes made fraudulent applications and the premiums have gone out of his account and he's had it reversed so monies have been returned to himself 

 

So um finding it hard to get my head around why all the other evidence has been thrown out and they've based it just on the fact the one who committed the fraud said there was a verbal agreement the eldest brother has given a false account and that aviva are saying a verbal agreement existed and all other evidence has been undermined 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that I don't believe it's worth chasing the police or anybody else at the moment – other than Aviva using the other thread in relation to data protection issues.

You can see that by and large nobody really wants to get involved. They all choose the path of least resistance. As far as they're concerned Aviva will get their money and they reckon that it will all die a death.

I understand that you may have a source of funds to buy off Aviva and if that's correct then it may well be worth paying them simply to get a quiet life and to mitigate your losses but do so under protest.

We need to discuss how this might happen

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would complain to the police - even if I thought it would go nowhere.  I can't see that you have anything to lose.

 

I can't tell you the grounds of your complaint because I don't know the details of everything that has happened (you know better than I do)  and because I've found much of the story too difficult to follow.  

 

But - based on everything you have told us - it seems to me that your brother has clearly committed fraud by obtaining the benefit of an insurance policy by falsely misrepresenting that he was opening the policy on your behalf and also by falsely misrepresenting himself - or a third party - as being your husband.  If your brother could not have taken out that policy without making those misrepresentations, then he has committed fraud.  It doesn't matter whether the victim was Aviva or you  and it doesn't matter if the victim realises they've been defrauded or not - the police should investigate it properly.  In this case you are the ultimate victim of the fraud because Aviva are saying that you owe them for the premiums on the policy your brother fraudulently took out, so whether Aviva consider they were the victims of fraud or not is irrelevant - they don't care because you end up as the fall guy.  Point out that this may have ended in a civil dispute over a debt between you and Aviva, but that that debt directly arises as a result of your brother's fraud in claiming to be acting on your behalf and by impersonating your brother.

 

One of the reasons the police seem to have dropped this case (and this needs to be one of your main grounds of complaint I think) is that they have accepted without question your brother's statement that your husband was somehow involved or in some way agreed to your brother taking this policy out in your name, and the police have simply and uncritically accepted your brother's word on that without ever speaking to your husband, who would vigourously deny it. 

 

(I can't make any better suggestion than that because, to be honest, I don't follow what has happened.  If you never authorised your brother to open this insurance policy at all then I don't understand why the police would place any importance at all on your husband being present at a meeting with your brother.  What did your husband's presence have to do with the insurance policy?  Even if he had been at such meeting (which you say he denies) then how could he authorise anything on your behalf?  None of it makes any sense to me and I can't see why the police would think it did.)

 

Challenge the police to explain to you why they believe there is insufficient evidence to pass this on to the CPS

 

I would follow the published complaints procedure of the police force in question and I would also send a copy to your local Police and Crime Commissioner.

 

I think the main problem here is that (despite what the nice woman PC may have suggested to you) the police have never considered you to be the victim.  You need to demonstrate to them via your complaint that you are the victim here.

 

One other question: is your husband and are your family supporting you through this, or are you going it alone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Manxman in exile I eloped to get with my husband si my husband and siblings never sat together in the same room .

 

Hes claiming a verbal agreement was made but a verbal agreement doesn't hold any water in the eyes of the law..no agreement was made I was in Leeds with my toddler. 

 

He has made use of the policy , had the luxury of the insurance and reversed the money back and now Aviva are coming after me.

 

You've summed it up well is there anyone in the group that can help me draft the complaint to the police as I'm flying out first thing tomorrow and my head is all over the place.

 

My husband me Mr z , my late father and eldest brother were at this meeting supposedly when the verbal agreement was made but yet the officer took a statement off the eldest brother and didn't take it off the husband and based the final decision on the eldest brothers statement and Mr Z and all other evidence which is in written form has been completely dismissed 

 

I'm fighting it all alone coming from an Asian background I am getting taunts and salt is bring rubbed on my wounds its not been a pleasant experience yo say the least trying to prove my innocence and having to listen to the b******* being spouted out by everyone whilst Mr Z is walking away not guilty 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add there is a scheme called the Victim's Right to Review.  It basically applies to decisions made by the CPS not to go ahead with a prosecution.  It doesn't apply to decisions made by local police forces, but it does say:

 

19.  Decisions that are not eligible for VRR include:

...

iii where the police or other investigator exercises their independent discretion not to investigate or not to investigate a case further (whether in consultation with the CPS or not) and the CPS have not been requested / have been unable to make a final decision to charge. Requests for review of such decisions should instead be addressed to the relevant police force/other investigator; [My bold]

 

I'm not familiar with the scheme so can't advise - but other posters here may know about it or have experience of it.  You need to read the above link but note that it talks about things that seem to fit your situation.   eg a victim is defined as ‘a person who has made an allegation that they have suffered harm, including physical, mental or emotional harm or economic loss which was directly caused by criminal conduct’.

 

If you have not already requested that the police review their decision not to pass the case onto the CPS, then I would do so.  If you are not happy with the outcome of that, complain.

 

I can't advise you definitely to go ahead and ask for a review or complain, but if I were in your situation that is what I would do.  But I tend to agree with BankFodder that you'll get nowhere and, if you are sick and tired of all this and just want it to go away, then just drop the police.  However, if you don't try...

 

[Apologies for the italic typeface/font - it's the above link causing it.  The italics should have stopped at the end of the third para above ending ' ... criminal conduct'.  I can't change it.  Very annoying]

Edited by Manxman in exile
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid you won't get a complaint drafted before tomorrow morning - and I think most others here think it would be a waste of time anyway and that the police decision won't change.  I would ask for a review and make a complaint on principle, but I suspect you are better off concentrating your effort on your other thread and direct complaint against Aviva.

 

Unless you are out of the country for an extended period I'd wait until your return before considering futrther whwther to complain about the police.

 

[ By the way, just so that you don't mislead yourself as it's a mistake many people make, ALL agreements are "verbal" in that they are composed of words.  Some agreements are in writing and others are oral, spoken or vocal.  The law recognises oral or spoken agreements just as much as ones that are written down.  The only practical difference is that oral agreements can be difficult to prove in a dispute]

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are flying away tomorrow (or rather this) morning I'd just forget about complaining to the police now.  As BF said earlier it's probably just a waste of your time anyway so I wouldn't worry about it.  Forget it for now.  Have a safe flight and concentrate on your other thread against Aviva.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@BankFodder I have received a response from aviva they have assumed authorisation as he claimed to be my husband they are not giving a full transcript of the inception call I am unable unable listen to the transcript due to being abroad etc 

 

Below is their response :

 

Good morning Mrs Bi

 

Thank you for your patience in awaiting our response to your e mail dated 27th September 2021.  We have now had the opportunity to review the call made to set up the policy and have attached a transcript of the part of the call which highlights your own personal identifiable information.  As you will see from the transcript, we spoke to Mr Mohammed Zafar who confirmed your date of birth and address and that he was authorised to deal with this matter for you.

 

I do hope this information is useful to you and resolves any outstanding queries you may have but please do not hesitate to contact us again should any concerns or queries remain.

 

I have password protected the file with the same password as we have previously used.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay we will deal with this when you get back. No real surprises here. They are scrambling to find some kind of justification.

It's quite ridiculous that they can have 1/3 party on the phone who simply gives somebody's name and address and a verbal assurance that they are authorised and that the company then goes ahead to issue contracts in their name.

This is clearly an example of unlawful data processing, in my view.

I don't think there's much else we can do on this thread and I think that we should start dealing with things on the other thread when you get back

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hope you're well

just to keep you in the loop with things,

whilst abroad i have had a freak accident i slipped on some marble flooring and dislocated my left knee it came out completely from the knee socket, bruised my left arm and elbow heavily  due to the weight of my body on impact and fractured my ankle. 

Im currently bed bound with a cast on my leg i was unable to travel back as the doctors wouldnt allow me to. 

I heard back from Aviva on 20/10 with the following response:

Quote

 

Good morning Mrs Bi

 

Thank you for your patience in awaiting our response to your e mail dated 27th September 2021.  We have now had the opportunity to review the call made to set up the policy and have attached a transcript of the part of the call which highlights your own personal identifiable information.  As you will see from the transcript, we spoke to Mr Mohammed Zafar who confirmed your date of birth and address and that he was authorised to deal with this matter for you.

 

I do hope this information is useful to you and resolves any outstanding queries you may have but please do not hesitate to contact us again should any concerns or queries remain.

 

 

I have access to emails so can continue to work whilst im bed bound, i have received nothing in the post from Aviva chasing payment or anything due to police now taking no further action.

 

I also havent heard back from the independent assessor

 

This is a short summary of where we are at , i gave a statement to yourself which you were finding hard to follow so we can work on that if you like, hubby will email you his and the cousin hasnt responded yet

 

Thank you for your patience but this freak accident has left me highly traumatised as it was not how i was wanting to spend my holiday but i thought id keep you all in the loop.

 

Much love x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this.

Obviously you won't be able to continue this claim until you have recovered and have returned safely.

The message that you have from Aviva is very helpful because it clearly indicates that they have nothing else from you.

They are effectively admitting that they opened a policy in your name – created contract with you – even though you weren't present – and they simply took the word of some unknown third party who happened to have your personal details.

I think what we will need is a list of all the communications which they apparently tried to send to you and your comments in relation to those as to why you didn't receive them.

I feel that I may have asked you this in the past – but anyway I'm asking you again.

A tabulated list would be very useful – for column – date, nature of communication from Aviva – did you receive it yes/no – comments.

Clearly the ombudsman speculated on this and that was a very strong basis for the ombudsman finding against you. We now have to be ready to counter that.

The statements are important – and your cousin' s statement is especially important

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

before I came abroad I checked with royal mail if they could tell me if any of my mail had been intercepted with they said they could only go back max 4yrs so this aviva business would be out of their window or remit to investigate 

I will speak to the cousin when I'm back he should also be back in the UK 

Yes we will tackle this when I'm back home I've booked return flights for 25/12 but aviva have sent nothing in the post yet will post any communication from them should I receive any 

 

Thank you 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have started receiving mail again from Aviva chasing the debt letters

I have emailed them to your email address for your reference

I am still abroad so im unable to send them in the format accepted in site

im due back Xmas day once my cast is taken off my leg

 

can we draft a letter or email please that i can email them in the interim to keep them off my back till I'm home safely before I tackle this

Sorry im drugged up quite badly on painkillers so not fully there any direction would be greatly appreciated as to how I tackle this now  thank you in advance 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing you can do and there is no point in writing to them. If they send your letter of claim then let us know. Other than that, there is absolutely nothing we can do until you are in a position to start dealing with it properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 680 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...