Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HoneybadvsHalifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

I really could use some advice right now! I have followed every stage of reclaiming my bank charges in the correct manner and allowing them maximum time to respond positively.

 

My MCOL was issued on 31/10 and they initially acknowledged on 09/11 and i had a copy of their acknowledgement papers sent to me by the court. They then had until the 04/12 to file a defence in reposonse to my claim (this was yesterday and neither the court or myself have had any response). I had been informed by another successful claimant on this site that Halifax usually send a letter offering full and final settlement a few days after they have filed an acknowledgement (this has not happened).

 

I was all ready to enter a judgement against them (thinking that at last my 5 month wait is almost at an end) and i read a post on this forum that has given me grave cause for concern.

 

It states that enetering a judgement may cause you to incur extra time delay, as the bank can apply to the court to issue a ruling that will "set aside the judgement"?????? (and i have to attend a hearing for this?) Is it really true that after all this time and the fact that the banks do not have a leg to stand on, they can still get away with not reimbursing charges??

 

It has also been stated that for someone in my position, it may be advantageous to send in a last letter warning them that if i do not receive funds within my account within 7 days, then i will issue a judgement against them for the full amount???

 

Or do you think that the Halifax are just back-logged with claims and that is the reason for their delay in responding to me?

 

I really don't know what to do for the best????

 

Dan.:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dan,

I'm just a little behind you. My claim was acknowledged on the 4th December. How I understood it, you can make a claim for judgement in default after 28 days from when the claim was acknowledged. I thought they could only ask for a stay if they hadn't acknowledged the claim initially. I.e. They are given 14 days for a reply and acknowledging buys them a further 14 days in which to enter a defence. If they haven't entered a defence after the further 14 days (28 in total) then I was under the impression that there were no further time delays. I bought the Small Claims Law Pack but it doesn't make it really clear. Maybe a phone call to MCOL would be the way forward to check if they have any options. If you find they can't go for a stay then file the judgement. Let me know how you get on.

Good luck

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dan,

Addendum to the above, I've managed to find other threads which confirm that once they've acknowledged they have to enter a defence. If they do you receive an allocation questionnaire if not you have WON!!! Here's hoping I don't hear anything before 25th December. It seems rather appropriate having Christmas Day as Judgement Day!!

 

All the best

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dan,

I just rang the MCOL myself as I wanted to be 100% sure of the situation. The bank CAN APPLY FOR A SET ASIDE if you file for a judgement, so I think the letter has to be the way forward giving them a final 7 days.

 

David

 

David,

 

Many thanks for your advice.

 

Do you think it may be beneficial to me to ring their legal dept to find out what is happening or should i just send the letter giving a final 7 days?

 

Dan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dan,

If it were me, I'd ring and then send the letter. Be weary of any tatics they might try on the phone. Write everything down as a record. A really good tatic is to record the conversation which you can do if you have a speaker phone. I've used a dictaphone in the past when I wanted accurate records of a phone conversation. You might have to inform them that you were recording the conversation if you wanted it to be admissable in court.

Hope this helps,

david

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dan,

If it were me, I'd ring and then send the letter. Be weary of any tatics they might try on the phone. Write everything down as a record. A really good tatic is to record the conversation which you can do if you have a speaker phone. I've used a dictaphone in the past when I wanted accurate records of a phone conversation. You might have to inform them that you were recording the conversation if you wanted it to be admissable in court.

Hope this helps,

david

 

David,

 

I don't want to sound stupid, but how should i word my conversation with them so that it doesn't sound too menacing and at the same time gets my point across??

 

Regards,

 

Dan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dan,

I would just be very polite but firm. I'm ringing up because you have not filed a defence to my claim numberxxxxx. The deadline for a submission of a defence was xx/xx/xx. As that date has passed I'm giving you the opportunity to settle the claim within 7 days before I file for a Judgement in Default. I will be putting this in writing.

Make sure you stick to the points you wish to make and not get sidetracked into any other discussions. I've read on the site that people in the legal depat are really quite nice!

Good Luck.

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...