Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Non delivered items dispute - Merchant threatening me


kodiplod
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1114 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased various items from two different stores. I had issues with both stores in where items where tracked and shown as delivered to my address but unfortunately have not been. I have had a few issues like these in the past due to me living in a ground floor flat in the city centre with various unlocked entry points to the communal area. 

 

As both stores have refused to refund me, I opened a dispute with my bank. Since then, the merchants are now clubbing up against me stating they have built a case against me and will be contacting relevant authorities and solicitors if I do not withdraw the dispute from my bank.

 

Where do I stand here and should my course of action be? I genuinely have not received these items but obviously do not want to get in trouble with the police!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please will you give us the name of these retailers on the open forum. It's very important and doesn't put you any disadvantage.

Also, you should disregard these threats. They are meaningless and these people do not have this kind of power.

 do you have copies of these of these threats in writing and if so please would you post them up here.

we will only be able to help you if you are prepared to trust us and follow our advice

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also don't understand how these merchants would be clubbing together which potentially would be in breach of data protection rules

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from one company after I made the dispute: Auto Oid is the company.

 

We’ve been made aware from a number of companies about your fraudulent activities and have built a case against you. 

We have it in writing from Royal Mail that the item was successfully delivered to your address via GPS tracking and have evidence that you have contacted us via a different email address confirming you have received the item. 

I suggest you retract your chargeback with immediate effect or you should be getting a call from our solicitors and the police. 

This will be my final warning.

 

This is from the second company: M L Performance

We've kept all the information on file relating to your case, including your Facebook profile, your business info linking your details to your Facebook profile, proof of delivery of both shipments, and should you decide to take this matter to the bank we will present all the evidence, and also seek legal action to recover any losses that occur as a result of this, as well as report this to the relevant authority.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then their target is surely the people that own flat in not employing the correct means of building security...??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there are a lot of questions to ask you.

First of all – and observation – there is no particular evidence here of "clubbing together" other than the fact that it seems to be quite a coincidence that these companies which presumably are independent of each other are attacking you in the same way. Do you have any explanation for this?

Next, apparently one company has said that they have received an email from you confirming that you have received the item. What details about that please?

Also, what are these items? And what is the value? And I suppose that we have to ask have you got any record of this kind of thing happening in the past? The message you have received says that they are aware of a number of companies who have experienced loss deliveries.

I have tried searching for the first company Auto Oid and I can't find them. Presumably they have a website. Please could you provide a link to them.

Is this the website of the second company? https://www.mlperformance.co.uk/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They both are in the same industry and I just assumed they have been speaking with each other.

 

Bit of background in regards to MLP... 

I was in a forum on Facebook in where I put a picture up of my car (on the morning of expected delivery from ML Performance) and stated that I will be fitting the said parts to my car next week. ML Performance found this post and are using this as evidence that I have received the goods. However, this post was put up at approx 8am and I put it up because I was excited I would be receiving my delivery later that day and fitting the parts to my car. The delivery was supposed to be coming around 2pm however it never did.

 

He then posted my Facebook profile and said evidence within this group and called me a scammer and wanted to warn other people about me. The post has since been removed however I was removed from the Facebook group (owner of ML Performance is the group moderator).

 

That is correct. Autoid claim they have evidence of an email received from a different email address claiming to have received this lost parcel. For some reason they think that I have emailed them from a different email address saying I have received it - it's crazy!

 

The items are car parts. ML Performance was approx £500 and Autoid is approx £400. Yes, I have had some issues with deliveries in the past to my current address but also so have my neighbours. We have had a case before where something was supposedly delivered and left outside my flat door but we assume was stolen. A door literally next to my front door leads on to a busy main road and is unlocked.

 

Autoid is the company. autoid.co  https://autoid.co/

 

 

Yes that is the correct second website. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, two things I think you should do.

Firstly is sent both these companies an SAR. Do it today.

Secondly, in case they do contact the bank, I think that it is better that your bank has it from you first rather than from them.

Presumably you have a chargeback reference number so I think that you should alert the bank to the fact that the chargeback is being challenged and that if your bank has any questions then you are happy to receive them and to answer them.
Let your bank have this information in writing.

I'm not sure what else we can do for the moment until something happens. It will be interesting to see the SARs and to see whether they have been sharing your personal data which would put you in a very good position. Also, they would be obliged to disclose this email address and that might give you something to go with as well.

By and large it sounds to me as if the threats are a load of hot air – but you certainly want to protect yourself and so take the steps that I suggested above. Let us know if there are any developments

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a couple of further thoughts along with BankFodder's, whose advice you should follow.

 

If they do in fact have GPS data, then that data will only be accurate enough to place the delivery driver near, or at best, in your building. It will not be accurate enough to place him definitively at your door and certainly doesn't prove you received the parcel, even if it was pinpoint accurate. Moreover, any GPS trackable services I've ever used tracked the van, not the package itself, which would further dilute its usefulness.

 

Secondly, if their claim is that your package was delivered, Royal Mail will have a signature from the recipient, which won't be you, right? Unless you gave the delivery company express permission to deliver to someone other than you, then won't liability for the lack of delivery rest with the Royal Mail through their failure to deliver to the correct recipient? To obtain the signature data, can the OP SAR Royal Mail themselves to get it, or on the basis that the company was the Royal Mail's client in this case, would that data only be available to them?

 

OP, I take it you have knocked on a few doors just to double check nobody else took this in for you and just hasn't bothered to contact you?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all correct.

 

No signatures are currently being given due to the pandemic, so it is solely relied on GPS or a picture of the parcel.

 

I have knocked on approx 5 doors and all with no luck. It’s really alarming to see that Autoid have received an email from someone claiming to have received my parcel. Absolutely madness that they think it’s me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...