Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
    • Point taken that we should inform new Caggers that the £20 option is there in wrong registration cases.  Well, supposedly there, who knows what the PPCs would do in practice.  Anyway, the option is allegedly there with both the BPA as you say, but also the IPC (I've just checked). However, there's a danger here of baby, bathwater. The two easiest types of cases to win are (a) residential - due to Supremacy of Contract and (b) wrong registration - due to "de minimis".  Indeed until recently we has been boasting that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing. We simply can do nothing about a terrible judge.  The judge seems - I say seems because we haven't had all the details - to have ignored "de minimis",. got fixated on a sign and awarded unreasonable behaviour costs.  A totally bizarre judgement.
    • You mean your witness statement 
    • That may be your personal claimed experience I said i didn't want smart meters - you jumped in to recommend smart meters I quite clearly indicated I was happy with being in credit to maintain constant payments - you suggest paying what I owe every month I quite clearly indicated I was happy with being in credit to maintain constant payments - you suggest a variable tariff - even if its one that only varies on a daily basis rather than half/hourly - with prices higher in winter when you need it and lowest in summer when you need it least   politeness ends with: - I'm NOT interested in any smart tariff I see, You are pushing your smart meter + variable tariffs in the wrong place - try pushing them somewhere 'nearer to home'  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DWP Social Fund Recovery After 25 years


MDF
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1126 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am looking for some advice .

 

In August of last year my wife received letter from dwp saying that they were going to deduct monies for a social fund loan .  At that time we had no idea what it was about

 

we called them and got no joy with comments such as you have got to pay it simples as that.  We still had no joy we wrote and waited 3 months for a response as stated at that point we had no idea what was going on.  In a phone call after escalation it was said that it related to 4  crises loans that we had in 1994-1995  some 25 years ago.  during this period we had not received any communication from the DWP at all.  However during this call the dip advised that i had them that i had called them and advised that i had been made Bankrupt in 1998. 

 

I have admitted that we had the loans though , however it remains about the bankruptcy.  As it is so long ago i have no information only what was put into the legal notices in the gazette i am sure i sent them the documentation however it this late stage cannot prove whether i did in fact put it in my bankruptcy .

 

could someone advise where i stand 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have they actually started to deduct anything to date?

stay off the phone from now on please

 

pop onto the DWP website 

type in SAR

and fill one out.

 

as you'll find with numerous threads here already, it is extremely rare for them to actually hold the data to PROVE you owe the money

it usually a case of an operators note from that period with no actual proof you owe anything.

admitting you had the loans doesn't hurt you, but DWP will have to prove what they are claiming not just supposition. 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I should of added my wife is severely disabled and I gave up work to be her carer such we are reliant on benefits 

 

as I said in my initial post I was declared bankrupt in 1998 I did call them and advise but cannot remember if I sent them the details of it

 

it’s 25 years ago and there is no information that I have kept I did go online and have found what was put into the London gazette

 

I am also informed that even if it wasn’t included as any debt accrued would be written off

I am also certain that the official receiver would have been in contact with them have requested information as advised but want to get things right 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they still need to hold the actual information of the loans and when they gave them too you etc etc

i bet they don't have that at all.

 

but a simple entry that there were loans , they used to farm all this out to outside agencies in those days and they put all kinds of twaddle in peoples files without documentary proof.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The social fund system exists on what is called the JSAPS computer system that was designed in the early 1990s and exists on mainframe computers at major DWP sites such as Quarry House in Leeds.  The details on those systems go all the way back to 1992.  

 

In short (I am a former Civil Servant from DWP) you need to SAR them as there is a chance from that long ago that the details may not have been processed through the computer system but processed on paper (this happened a lot in the 1990s)

 

I doubt any paper records from that time still exist I also doubt DWP would ever be able to enforce repayment especially as you are reliant on Benefits.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dcahater76 for your information i have requested through the SAr for the information.  

 

The matter was escalated to Milton Keynes which i believe is a major dip centre .  They just started taking the money off us through our benefits without any paperwork

 

it was only after having no success with phone calls we put it into writing then after long wait and chasing 4 months they write for our permission to investigate it,  they responded to say they had signed documents from us to say about them  they did say they had written with enclosed proof but no such letter arrived.  

 

After chasing a response they said that they had the proof and as such would be perusing continuation of recovering the money.  They did however say that they had not dealt with our situation over the past 25 years and apologised very well and put it down to resources and other things happening.  

 

I have done a lot of info looking today and have found out that if they can't recover they put it into debt collection agencies to get it we had none of that nor any communication rom them. in addition the official receiver would have also been in contact with them.  

 

there is a lot wrong with the way our situation has been dealt with and im sure many others but one department doesn't answer for all there you go around the houses and get nowhere. we don't even know the full amount  

 

I am determine to fight this but they are bigger than me so will have a fight on my hands.  they are deducting so much per week and it will take around 3 years to pay back.

 

thanks to everyone for their comments all are most welcome

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To give a bit of background DWPs predecessors the Benefits agency administered social fund loans from the early 1990s.  At this time none of the government departments had a massive amount of technology everything was done on paper for example I live in Halifax and back in 1995 I had to sign on as unemployed for 1 month between jobs.  I made a claim for unemployment benefit at the office in Halifax which meant my claim was processed at Halifax Benefit Centre as was.  ThenPaperwork would have been stored in a file store which occupied the top floor of the building.

 

every Benefit Centre had this back then.  Over the intervening years a lot of local benefit centres were closed and most of the historical paperwork got shredded I.e Joe blogs claimed jobseekers in 1974 four pages detailing his claim not needed anymore so due to this process a lot of old paperwork never got transcribed onto the various legacy DWP systems.  
 

the notes on the systems from those times aren’t probably extant now as the jsaps sytem notes have to be pruned every now and then as it is limited to 2 pages on Notes.

Edited by dcahater76
Spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...