Jump to content


CEL ANPR PCN Claimform - Tily Carpentry Yate Bristol ***Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 939 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant : Civil Enforcement Limited

 

Claimants Solicitors: No Stated

 

Date of issue – 15 March 2021

 

Date for AOS - 3 April 2021

 

Date to submit Defence - 16 April 2021

 

What is the claim for – 

1.claim for monies relating to a parking charge for parking in a private car park managed by the claimant in breach of the terms + conditions (T+Cs).

 

2, Drivers are allowed to park in accordance with T+Cs of use.

 

3. ANPR cameras and/or manual patrols are used to monitor vehicles entering + exiting the site.

 

4. Debt + damages claimed the sum of 182.00. Violation date: 10/01/2020 Time in: 14:29 Time out: 14:57 PCN Ref: xxxxxx Car Registration No. xxxxxx Car Park:- Tily Carpentry Total Due: 182.00 (Ref:www.ce-service.co.uk or Tel:01158225020)

 

5.The claimant claims the sum of 199.03 for monies relating to a parking charge per above including 17.03 interest pursuant to S.69 of the county court acts 1984 Rate 8.00% pa from dates above to - 12/03/21 Same rate to judgment or (sooner) payment Daily rate to judgment- 0.04 Total debt and interest due- 199.03

 

What is the value of the claim?

 

Amount Claimed: 199.03

court fees : 25.00

legal rep fees : 50.00

Total Amount : 274.03

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you please fill in the questions below. They do like to add on the charges don't they-though it does work in your favour if they ever go to court.  I notice they haven't said how you breached their stupid rules-did they tell you on their PCN? 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, yes the penalty look very disproportionate to anything I've seen before! 182.00 for 28 minutes and according to my son who this applies to was legally parked to use a cake shop.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL ANPR PCN - Tily Carpentry

its not a penalty and its not an illegal/legal parking issue ....that would be via magistrates

this is a county court claim for supposedly breaking some imaginary contract when the driver entered the private land.

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.

 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count].....

 

…………..

 

there are numerous CEL claimform threads here ....they never get everything right.

get reading up.

 

you'll soon get the idea.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent that was quick. As it was one of your children driving it is important not to let CEL know who was driving and hopefully CEL has messed up their documentation so there is no keeper liability. So if you could please fill out the following questions we will find out-

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL ANPR PCN Claimform - Tily Carpentry

also find out if he got a letter of claim about 4 weeks ago too.

 

collect any/all paperwork from him to date, bar  the claimform pack, and scan it all up bothsides of everything to ONE multipage PDF

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately all correspondence sent have been thrown away so He is unable to answer these questions accurately.

 

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]

(must be received within 14 days from the Incident)

 

1 Date of the infringement

10/01/2020
2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

Not Sure

3 Date received

Not Sure
4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

Not Sure
5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

Yes

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

No
Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

n/a

7 Who is the parking company?

Civil Enforcement Limited

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

Tily Carpentry Yate Bristol

9.For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

BPA
 

 

unfortunately all other letters have been thrown in the bin

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL ANPR PCN Claimform - Tily Carpentry Yate Bristol

The work you're putting in to fight CEL is superb.  FWIW, the last three times CEL took Caggers to court, CEL got a good kicking, so they are eminently beatable.

 

However, a cautionary tale.  We recently had a member who was building up evidence to support his son-in-law, who was being sued (not a private parking matter, another type of legal dispute).  This Cagger put in a huge effort - but once the son-in-law found himself alone in a legal setting he was out of his depth and pretty much crumbled.

 

If CEL do take this to court, it will be your son who will have to appear.  There's no point you being brilliantly sussed about the matter, he needs to deal with his own case.

 

He's already scored an own goal by throwing away the paperwork.  CEL often can't be bothered to follow the law when they send out their demands, but we can't be sure because we haven't got the letters.  He also presumably ignored a Letter Before Claim and might well have been able to stop CEL at that stage.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant information and something we need to take on board should it go to court but I would accompany my son as a Mckenzie friend so hopefully avoiding the same mistake. I've asked him to tidy his flea pit of a flat and try to locate any letters he may not have thrown away but I'm not holding up much hope.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

WS

they don't know who was driving correct?

do you drive?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking the very same thing as this was back in January 2020 and he shared his car with the girlfriend, I was thinking of writing to them and asking them for photo evidence who was the driver. I know from reading the information they can only obtain from the DVLA is who is the registered keeper but as stated on the V5 form this is not proof of ownership. I'm not sure if this will work?

 

Yes I do drive

Edited by webbscatering

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

na you missed the point..and no they dont have to prove who was driving nor should they ever be put to that proof or else it gets VERY messy legally which even these people that tout themselves for +£300 a pop don't go there ever. either.

 

you could of stated you were the driver

then the court claim would be against you...

too far gone now.

in parking matters Mckenzie friend's are normally more harm than good.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea is not to reveal who was driving but to create doubt who was driving. CEL are particularly poor with their PCNs at creating keeper liability which is a shame if your son has thrown away what could be vital evidence. [CEL frequently don't adhere to the correct wording necessary in PoFA to allow keeper liability or they send off the NTK to late to comply with the Act] It is not fatal since they will have to include all correspondence in their WS or perhaps with their CPR request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see what CPR comes up with.

 

If CEL don't reply then he can SAR them.

 

As Lookinforinfo says, they will have to include this documentation in their WS, but it would be useful to know before.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

it would be interesting FTMDave but reading through previous posts on the forum it doesn't look like they will be forthcoming with that info, in the meantime I'm also hoping the lad can find some sort of correspondence from CEL. Thanks for the advice

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they will have too at ws stage else they will lose if they don't.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Surprise Surprise CEL have complied with our requests and have sent the paperwork, without having to scan the bundle of letters what in particular are we looking for? also we have until the 16th April to file our defence,

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets not chance missing something important eh?

best to scan both sides of everything up to one multipage PDF

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...