Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SAR request extension


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

I have been helping a friend of mine with his unfair dismissal case which is now with a solicitor.

 

On the 10/02/2020 I sent a sar to his company  and have recieved the answer from them on 09/03/2020 and wondered how I should proceede.

 

I understand the one month is reasonable but a further two months?

 

Sorry if I placed this in the wrong forum.

 

Regards

Daverules

 

image.thumb.png.80a7225f8d274b49570f1cd0fa6ce652.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to SAR request extension

You could send them a letter of claim giving them 32 days – fix a date.

Tell them that being a small company should mean that it is easier for them to produce the information that you require. Also, the fact that they have left it to the last moment to ask for this extension suggests that they are not taking their statutory request seriously.

You are granting them an extension until XX date and if you do not have the disclosure informed by that date you will issue proceedings and without any further notice

Tell them also that there is no right to extend the deadline in the way they suggest – and if they want they can explain that to the judge if that's the way they want to go

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you BankFodder

 

I am doing the letter of claim now, I was concerned concerned as on the ICO website it says the following:

Can we extend the time for a response?

You can extend the time to respond by a further two months if the request is complex or you have received a number of requests from the individual. You must let the individual know within one month of receiving their request and explain why the extension is necessary.

 

Reading their response that says they "reserve the right to exercise the right to extend the deadline by a further 2 months if required" so I assume they looked it up.

 

But i will take your advice and proceede with the letter.

 

Regards

daverules

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I wonder if you could take a quick look at this letter and tell me if it's to much or where it is incorrect.

 

Reference: GDPR Letter Dated 10/02/2020

As it has not been possible to resolve this matter amicably, and it is apparent that court action may be necessary, I write in compliance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct.

Failure to provide the material requested in way of a GDPR request within one calendar month.

From you I am claiming all material as described within my GDPR request.

Listed below are the documents on which I intend to rely in my claim against you:

GDPR request letter as posted on 09/02/2020 and Proof of posting receipt dated 09/02/2020.

In accordance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct I would request that you provide me with copies of the following documents:

For the avoidance of doubt, and as stated above, this Subject Access Request requires disclosure of ALL personal data which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you, and for any doubt this includes Wage slips and Time sheets.

 

I also require you to confirm to me that you are processing my personal data, how you acquired it, for what purpose you are processing it and also to identify all the parties with whom you have shared it. You are required to provide this information regardless of whether you believe that the substantive disclosure satisfies the conditions which permit you to impose a charge.  

I also require you to confirm whether my data has been subject to any automatic processing which has resulted in decisions or suggested decisions being made in respect of me. Also, has my personal data been used in any way to categorise me or to place me on any lists. If so please explain.  

 

Finally, I should remind you that you have a duty to make clear the meaning of any codes or shorthand which you use in relation to my personal data.  

In accordance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct I would request that you provide me with copies of the following documents:

I can confirm that I would be agreeable to mediation and would consider any other system of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in order to avoid the need for this matter to be resolved by the courts. 

I would invite you to put forward any proposals in this regard. 

In closing, I would draw your attention to paragraphs 15 and 16 of the Practice Direction which gives the courts the power to impose sanctions on the parties if they fail to comply with the direction including failing to respond to this letter before claim. 

I believe being a small company should mean that it is easier for you to produce the information that I require. Also, the fact that you have left it to the last moment to ask for this extension suggests that you are not taking their statutory request seriously.

I look forward to hearing from you within the next 32 days, the date being 13/04/2020

Should I not receive a response to my letter within this time frame then I anticipate that court action will be commenced with no further reference to you.

Yours faithfully, 

 

 

Regards

daverules

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I had forgotten the extension rules. Don't send this letter. It needs to be fundamentally changed anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry about all the pre-action protocol stuff in your letter.

You need simply to get down to the point.

Yes I'm sure that it's a load of rubbish but they are simply using the rules and am afraid that you have to take them at their word. There's nothing that you can do.

The wording of the letter was ambiguous. It almost suggests that they are asking for a one-month extension and then they reserve the right to extend a further two months.

Clearly three months is the maximum by which they can exchange.

I would send them that very simple letter of claim.

I would send you point out that you receive notice of their extension. I would also point out that you don't believe that the request is large or complex and that they are simply playing games but despite that you realise that you have no option other than to accede to their extension.
Therefore they are on notice that if you have not had the disclosure at the end of the 30 day extension that you will begin legal proceedings.

However, you fully expect that in view of the fact that they want to play the system that they will then notify you of the need for a further extension and so if they do notify you of a further extension, they should consider that this letter of claim will itself be extended to that new deadline of the first 30 days after which a County Court action will be started against them and without any further notice.

I would suggest that you work out the dates of the first 30 day extension and then the second 30 day extension.

It's very frustrating. There's nothing you can do. They clearly gaming the system – but I would suggest that you now harden your resolve to bring an action at the end of the second 30 day period if they haven't produced the disclosure that you want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post a draft here before you send it off

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi here is a reduced draft of what I will send:

 

Reference: GDPR Letter Dated 10/02/2020

As it has not been possible to resolve this matter amicably, and it is apparent that court action may be necessary.

You have failed to provide the material requested in way of a GDPR request within one calendar month.

From you I am claiming all material as described within my GDPR request.

Listed below are the documents on which I intend to rely in my claim against you:

GDPR request letter as posted on 09/02/2020 and Proof of posting receipt dated 09/02/2020.

I believe being a small company should mean that it is easier for you to produce the information that I require. Also, the fact that you have left it to the last moment to ask for this extension suggests that you are not taking their statutory request seriously.

I look forward to hearing from you within the next 32 days, the date being 17/04/2020

Should I not receive a response to my letter within this time frame then I anticipate that court action will be commenced with no further reference to you.

Yours faithfully, 

 

Many thanks for viewing this for me

 

daverules

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...