Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello BankFodder I do have a sales invoice from SEHBAC showing the warranty transfer and fee paid.   The warranty is a 10-year warranty provided by the installers at the time of fitting 0n the 27/8/2015, fully endorsed by the Glazing federation.   This is underwritten by QA National Warranties. Section one:-  agrees to indemnify the policy holder in respect of making good a defect in the insured works where the contractor has ceased trading and is consequently unable to rectify the defects subject to the terms of the written guarantee issued to the policy holder.  A defect being defined as a physical fault or error in the insured works caused by defective workmanship or defective materials.   Section two:- covers breach of building regulations cover where the contractor has ceased trading. Sadly, in this case I have no claim against the insurers as the company has not ceased trading.   The installers have agreed that there is remedial work that needs to be carried out. The delay during the last few months has been annoying, especially as we are struggling to warm our living space to a satisfactory temperature without excessive use of the heating.   I have no Idea of the cost of the works required.    You have obviously realised from the information that I have given so far, that I feel that the remedial work will not fully address the issues. From the comments made by the surveyor at the time of inspection, the work that needs to be carried out will require the windows be deconstructed and reinstalled, this to me indicates that the workmanship in the fitting was substandard and consequently gives me little confidence that any repair will rectify the problem, but will only be a patch job, unfortunately this will not be known until or if the work is carried out.   I have not had an independant inspection of the work carried out, and would not know who to approach to carry out this sort of inspection.   The installers have given no indication of the actual work required to rectify the issues.   Thank you for your help.    
    • AXA have no obligation to explain anything to you about their policy cover because you are a third party and have no contractual relationship with them.  Your claim is against the gardener. If AXA's policy had insured the gardener then AXA, for practical reasons, would have dealt with you direct. But for whatever reason they have decided that their policy will not insure the gardener against your claim.   So AXA are correct that you will need to pursue the gardener directly for the damage to your property and he will have to pay it from his own pocket. If he disagrees then you would have to start a small claims court action and a judge would decide if the gardener was liable.   It's normal for insurers to ask for details of the damge you are claiming for before they decide whether it's covered by their policy. This hasn't disadvantaged you because you will need that information to make a claim directly against the gardener.   It's not correct that you would get new for old if AXA had agreed to pay the claim. As a third party claimant you'd get the same whether AXA paid it or the gardener pays direct - the used value.   Is the property that was in the lockup insured by you under your own household policy? Have you put in a claim for to your insurers? If it's covered by your policy then it's quite likely you would get paid 'new for old' value.
    • I don't understand why you think you should be entitled to claim new for old from 1/3 party insurer. On the basis that we are talking about negligence, you would only be entitled to be put back into the position that you would have been had the negligent act not occurred. This means that you would be entitled to obtain the replacement value of the damaged items. What kind of items are we talking about here? What kind of value are we talking about here
    • Online companies will be responsible for stopping fraudulent user-generated content on their platforms, under new legislation View the full article
    • Look at a Credit file default as a punishment, after 6 years you've served your time and it's over.    In fact even if you had a couple of defaults 3 years ago on your file, it still wouldn't be a problem. Which is why there is something else at play here.  As for the differences between brokers, when I went for my mortgage I had 2 different one's trying to get me the same product. One rang me back apologising , telling me that I wasn't eligible, the other one got me the mortgage.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 33 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/mortimer Claimform - old newday Marbles Credit Card debt


Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

I received a county court claim form on Thursday dated 18/02/2021 saying that the claimant (CABOT FINANCIAL (UK) is claiming for the sum of £2140.14 on behalf of  NEW DAY LTD RE MARBLES. but it requests all documents to be sent to MORTIMER CLARKE SOLICITORS.

 

Now i think i did have a marbles card a while ago although my partner says that that was a capital one card.

 

But either way i don't like the idea of these parasites chasing me for money for a debt they probably bought for £10. 

 

From looking around here it seems that i should be sending them a CCA request and a CPR 31.14.

 

I've bought a £1 postal order.

 

Is there anything else i need to do?

 

Thanks for any help given ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Cabot/mortimer Claimform - old newday Marbles Credit Card debt
  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

please complete this:   You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do - Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group

no go back and read my guide earlier CAREFULLY...

the CCA dept won't have a clue a claim has been issued   defence is due monday by 4pm.   pop up your ideas from your research here.    

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply ;)

 

Name of the Claimant ? CABOT FINANCIAL (UK) LIMITED

 

Date of issue –  18/02/2021

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

 

1.By an agreement between New Day Ltd RE Marbles & the Defendant with a credit card.

 

2.The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due.

 

3.The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice.

 

4.The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant.

 

THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS

1. 2140.14 

2. Costs

 

What is the total value of the claim? £2325.14
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? I could have
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Not Sure but im going to look back on old emails. But I think it would have been around 2018.
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? If I did it would have been online

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No but there is a DCA on there that could be for this.

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser by the looks of it.
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I could have but I’ll need to look back.
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not sure but its possible.
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not sure but its possible.
 
 What was the date of your last payment? 
I don’t know.
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No.
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.
..
get a CCA Request running to the claimant

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/

..

Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed

.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

on BOTH type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............


 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

woe SLOWDOWN>

 

your defence is weeks away. (day 33)

no there are no templates as each claim is unique.

however, if you use our search top right.

for say

claimform card

you'll see numerous versions people have adapted based upon our std holding/no paperwork defence , one of which, might well be suitable.

 

get CCA/CPR requests running monday

and get AOS done now on mcol, you've already lost 10 of your 19days to do AOS

 

then get reading up as i detailed above

the more you read here the stronger we become

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no go back and read my guide earlier CAREFULLY...

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please just type

no need to keep hitting quote....

 

read what it says in red at the top of the CPR 31:14 template..carefully again..

i can see this thread continuing with these series of schoolboy errors and you screwing up if you dont learn to read and follow things carefully .

 

just send the CPR as is no need to worry about if or not something is applicable .

they rarely respond anyway which is why we say don't miss defence filing date whatever happens..

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I'm still trying to get to grips with everything :( 

 

Just filling in the address for the claimant on my CCA but they haven't put a postcode.

 

Should i be trying to find it out or use this in my defence ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited is an Appointed Representative of Cabot Credit Management Group Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with firm reference number 677910.

Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited is registered in England and Wales with Company No. 3439445. Registered Office: 1 Kings Hill Avenue, Kings Hill, West Malling, Kent ME194UA.

Cabot Financial (Marlin) Limited is registered in England and Wales with Company No. 4618038. Registered Office: Marlin House, 16-22 Grafton Road, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 1QP.

 

you'll get there , you aren't alone.

 

just take things carefully and methodically.

its not the scary situation you think it is...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX

 

I'm sure i will get my head around all this and forum etiquette.

 

 

 

I wonder if this is something that they are doing to miss guide me as so far I've spotted that they have missed off their postcode and the letter at the end of my door number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

every court claimed raised by a dca debt buyer is a speculative claim, they never hold any paperwork or bother to ever get anything right as 99.9% of people simply wet themselves and cough up thinking they are superhuman and oh so powerful.

 

truth is it's what we call a roboclaim never expecting it to ever be defended.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been reading threads on here and its amazing the tactics some of these DCA's use.

 

I can understand why people don't want to pay them even if they do think they owe the original debt.

 

I've sent off the CCA and CPR requests yesterday recorded delivery so they should have them today.

 

 

Is there anything else I should be doing like trying to compile a defence (don't know where to start with that one)?

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 28/02/2021 at 01:22, dx100uk said:

woe SLOWDOWN>

 

your defence is weeks away. (day 33)

no there are no templates as each claim is unique.

however, if you use our search top right.

for say

claimform card

you'll see numerous versions people have adapted based upon our std holding/no paperwork defence , one of which, might well be suitable.

 

get CCA/CPR requests running monday

and get AOS done now on mcol, you've already lost 10 of your 19days to do AOS

 

then get reading up as i detailed above

the more you read here the stronger we become

 

dx

 

 

 

 

well done you are learning ....

 

the red bit above is your next bit..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

I received this from Cabot today.

 

"We have received your request 
Thank you for your request for information under sections 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Unfortunately we currently do not have the relevant information on file, so we will be requesting a copy of the credit agreement and terms and conditions from your original lender, as well as a statement of your account. This may take some time, but we will write to you within the next 12 days with an update. 


For information on what to expect from making a CCA request there is further information available on the National Debtline website on their 'Credit agreements - getting information' factsheet.

 

Your account 
You still have an outstanding balance of £2325.14 and you currently do not have plan in place with us. We would like to discuss the available options with you and you an affordable solution for this account. 


This account may be on your credit file and could affect your ability to get credit, apply for a mortgage or a phone contract. Even if we are unable to supply your paperwork, this account will remain on your credit file for six years from the date the default was registered."

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCA dept won't have a clue a claim has been issued

 

defence is due monday by 4pm.

 

pop up your ideas from your research here.

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think his would be a good one to modify ?

 

 

Particulars of Claim

1) The Defendant entered into a consumer credit Act 1974 regulated agreement with Shop Direct under account reference +++++++++
(‘the Agreement’).

2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

3) The Agreement was later assigned to Claimant on ++++++ and notice given to the Defendant.

4) Despite Repeated Requests for payment, the sum of £++++ remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims
a) The said sum of ++++++++++
b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.+++++, But limited to one year, Being ++++
c) Costs 


#####Defence######

1 The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature.

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have no recollection of an agreement with Shop Direct and do not recognise this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request under the consumer credit Act 1974
3. Paragraph 2 is denied I have not been served with a Default Notice pursuant to the consumer credit Act 1974.

4. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of a legal assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1)

5. On receipt of the claim form, the Defendant sent a request by way of a section 78 pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974, for a copy of the agreement, the Claimant has yet to comply and remains in default of the said request. 

6. A further request made via CPR 31.14 to the claimants solicitor, requesting disclosure of documents on which the Claimant is basing their claim. The claimant has not complied. 
7. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and;
b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for and;
c) show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice pursuant to sec 88 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim

8. As per Civil Procedureicon 16.5 it is expected that the claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed

9. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of section 136 of the Law of Property Act and section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

I would like to take this opportunity to remind the claimant of their obligations under sections 77 and 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1994. On the +++++++ you received a letter from me requesting true signed copies of the alleged agreement. To date you have failed to comply with my statutory request and, as of ++++, have defaulted in respect to the above account.

You are reminded that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the CCA 1974.

You have already exceeded the 12 days permitted by the CCA, and are now in default. 

A credit agreement that is not properly documented is unenforceable under the Consumer Credit Act and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued. 

Please note that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

or maybe this would be a better one to modify?

 

Particulars of Claim

1) The Defendant entered into a consumer credit Act 1974 regulated agreement with Shop Direct under account reference +++++++++
(‘the Agreement’).

2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

3) The Agreement was later assigned to Claimant on ++++++ and notice given to the Defendant.

4) Despite Repeated Requests for payment, the sum of £++++ remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims
a) The said sum of ++++++++++
b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.+++++, But limited to one year, Being ++++
c) Costs 

 

Defence 

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted and it is accepted in so far that I have once held an account with New Day Ltd RE Marbles . I do not recollect the details nor am I aware of any outstanding balance that the claimant refers to and have therefore sought clarity from the claimant given that that they are the assignee of this alleged debt and have very little knowledge of what they are claiming and do not appear to be able to disclose any further details by way of CPR 31.14./CCA Request

 

3. Paragraph 2 is noted, the claimant is put to strict proof to evidence any breach in the agreement and evidence any Intention to file a Default.

 

4. Paragraph 3 is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment.

 

5. On the 27th July  2020 ( sent by recorded delivery) I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request. The claimant has failed to date to respond to the CPR request.

 

6. On the 27th July  2020 ( sent by recorded delivery) I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA request. The claimant has failed to date to respond to the CCA request.

 

7. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an Agreement ; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of the breach and service of a valid default notice;

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

7. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14 / CCA Request

 

8. As per Civil Procedure icon Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

9. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit  Act 1974. 

 

10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are doing really well ....excellent research.:rockon: 10/10

 

bit busy for now, but there are a few bits that need slight adjustment 

i'e..

22 hours ago, DontLetThemDoIt said:

in so far that I have once held an account with New Day Ltd RE Marbles .

had financial dealing with Newday .......

 

22 hours ago, DontLetThemDoIt said:

given that that they are the assignee of this alleged debt and have very little knowledge of what they are claiming and do not appear to be able to disclose any further details 

 

i would remove

 

22 hours ago, DontLetThemDoIt said:

3. Paragraph 2 is noted, the claimant is put to strict proof to evidence any breach in the agreement and evidence any Intention to file a Default.

a debt buyer cannot file a default..

 

use 

 

On 15/03/2021 at 21:58, DontLetThemDoIt said:

3. Paragraph 2 is denied I have not been served with a Default Notice pursuant to the consumer credit Act 1974.

add...from the original creditor 

 

22 hours ago, DontLetThemDoIt said:

5. On the 27th July  2020 ( sent by recorded delivery) I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request. The claimant has failed to date to respond to the CPR request.

 

the claimants solicitor

 

22 hours ago, DontLetThemDoIt said:

7. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

by cpr 31:14 & CCA request 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you soooo much DX.

 

So you mean something like this?

 

 

Particulars of Claim

1) The Defendant entered into a consumer credit Act 1974 regulated agreement with Shop Direct under account reference +++++++++
(‘the Agreement’).

2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

3) The Agreement was later assigned to Claimant on ++++++ and notice given to the Defendant.

4) Despite Repeated Requests for payment, the sum of £++++ remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims
a) The said sum of ++++++++++
b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.+++++, But limited to one year, Being ++++
c) Costs 

 

Defence 

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted and it is accepted in so far that I have once had financial dealing with New Day Ltd RE Marbles . I do not recollect the details nor am I aware of any outstanding balance that the claimant refers to and have therefore sought clarity from the claimant as they do not appear to be able to disclose any further details by way of CPR 31.14./CCA Request.

 

3. Paragraph 2 is denied I have not been served with a Default Notice pursuant to the consumer credit Act 1974 from the original creditor.

 

4. Paragraph 3 is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment.

 

5. On the 27th July  2020 ( sent by recorded delivery) I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request. The claimants solicitor has failed to date to respond to the CPR request.

 

6. On the 27th July  2020 ( sent by recorded delivery) I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA request. The claimant has failed to date to respond to the CCA request.

 

7. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14CCA request  therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an Agreement ; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of the breach and service of a valid default notice;

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

7. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14 / CCA Request

 

8. As per Civil Procedure icon Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

9. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit  Act 1974. 

 

10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would drop marbles...bit. no good being vague if you admit you have a marbles card

 

sentence 7 is repeated

 

and thats a shop direct poc in red..

 

looks ok

 

let andyorch check things 1st

 

due monday by 4pm

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...