Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You mentioned the analogy of a woman who changes her name on marriage and can legally use either.  We don't normally ask posters here whether they are male or female but in this case it may be relevant, so can I ask, are you a man or a woman?
    • Hi Guys   I really could to with a bit of advice.   I have used the surname A (we will call it that to help with the explanation....lol) all my life. Name A is on everything i need my name for on a regular basis (my birth certificate, driving licence, bank accounts, utility bills, doctors....etc).   Now as a child my mum remarried and thought it a good idea in all her wisdom to ask the school to put a name B on my file.   So when it came time for my national insurance number came it had the name B on it.   Inland revenue said that there wasn’t a problem with this as long as i never try and do anything fraudulently (trying to obtain benefits in two names…etc) but later in life there was a few problems with ID not matching, so I spoke to a solicitor and they wrote me out a stator declaration stating that the person with the surname B and national insurance number is the same person as the person with name A.   This has always worked perfectly with any issues that arose up until I applied for a passport.   Now on to my actual problem….   I’ll try and keep this a bit shorted as the passport office has constantly messed things up and either contradicted themselves or apologised.     I applied for a first UK passport and as I’m English and fall within a certain age bracket all I had to send them was a form filled in by someone that has known me for a number of years. I sent this off and received a letter stating they needed more information and I needed to contact them. This then turned into the actual decision maker calling me back the following day.   She said that because I had put that I had been known by name B once that they would need to see that I have changed my name to name A.   After explaining the situation with her about name B and that there is nothing really that I can change as I only use name A, she requested that I send in my birth certificate so she could complete the application.   I sent this in and had a repeat letter from them saying they needed more information and I had to get the decision maker to call me back again.   This time she said she would need a stator declaration to explain the name. I said I have one of those (I actually forgot I had it until she requested it) but explained that it wasn’t a change of name and just explaining that the person with name A is the same person as name B. she asked me to read it out word for word to make sure it had the right heading…etc and said for me to send in the statutory declaration, driving licence a bank statement and a recent utility bill.   I sent this all in and guess what…… I get another letter saying they need more information.   So we go down the same route with a call back only this time she says she wants a letter from HMRC in the name A and a statutory declaration stating I have changed my name from name B to name A.   I reminded her about the situation with the names and explained that HMRC say there is not a problem with my name and that I would in effect be lying to a solicitor as im not changing my name to name A because its already name A.   She then completely changed her tone and started going on about me also needing to sit an interview…etc (that I expected anyway) and that if she was to give me a passport then there would be nothing stopping me from getting a passport in name B. I then said ok ill go ahead and have the passport in name B but she said a letter from HMRC is not enough to get a passport.     This has gone back and forth with different departments and I had to make a complaint (even that was a problem because I had normal representatives claiming to be from the complaints department so they didn’t actually open a complaint).     It’s got to the point now that I need to get the ombudsman to step in.   I had a consultation with solicitor that agreed that I’m completely in the right and said went down the lines of the fact that it’s not a legal requirement to have name A with HMRC and it can be presumed that I am going to do something fraudulently. And he likened it to a woman that has got married and can use her maiden name as well as her married name (there’s not one rule for one and one for another as this is discrimination).   I need to send something off to the ombudsman so I was wondering if there was some legal stuff I could quote?     Thanks for any help given and sorry for the long post….lol
    • The bigger arguments were   You need to stay in the UK to stay in the EU - and the UK would veto Scotlands entry - they cant now   Currency - you cant use the UKP - many arguments contrary to that and Scotalnd could easily choose dual currency - rather like the english and scottish fivers   Finance - For starters: * Kick the nuclear subs out and access the gas and oil and fish in those Scottish waters for a 10 year plus boom with no England interference and bleeding dry - as Scotland gets established in the EU * Fishing (in agreement with the EU and Norway etc was always more important to scotland and the tocks are moving North * Become the route from Ireland and the US to the EU - ask Dover etc how profitable that was *** Demand a full breakdown and legitimacy of the part of the UKs debt they might be expected to share - including the 100billion chumocracy payments .. if England dare ask   Hows that for starters?
    • They never included statements.  Just a list of each loan.  Date taken out and amount.
    • Hi.   As far as I can see, you haven't read any other private parking threads to understand how this works. If you don't mind my saying, you need to read more threads so you grasp the whole process.   HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 33 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

Erudio/Shoosmith PAPLOC By email - old Scottish SAAS Loan


Recommended Posts

I received the following email from Shoosmiths regarding an old SLC loan that was sold to Erudio.

 

I applied for deferment every year until I turned 50 (at which point the debt should have been written off under the original t&c)

 

I used a modified version of the SLC form (changing SLC to Erudio & the deferment threshold).

 

Except for the last year when my objections to the original forms were (as far as I could see) removed and I felt I had no reasonable objection to their form any more.

 

They refused to process the applications based on the SLC form.

 

I am happy to go to court as I think I have a strong case.

 

I am in Scotland if that makes any difference.

 

How should I respond to the following email?


"Please find attached a copy of our client’s Letter Before Action.

We are keen to seek a payment proposal from you.

 

In order for our client to consider any offer to make repayments towards the outstanding debt owed, please find attached an Income & Expenditure Form for completion.

 

Please complete and return this form by 3 March 2021.. Alternatively, please contact us on 03700 868120 to complete this form over the telephone.
 
If we do not hear from you by the above date, we may be instructed by our client to take further action to recover the outstanding balance. This may include raising court action and obtaining decree against you.

 

A court Decree may affect your ability to obtain credit in the future and may result in further enforcement action being taken against you. This may result in us deducting sums from your earnings, taking steps to prevent you from selling any property you may own, and will involve you in further expense. No further notice may be given.

 

If you need to seek advice then you should do so as a matter of urgency. You may wish to contact a Solicitor or one or more of the organisations listed below who are able to provide independent advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm... they shouldn't be sending a letter of claim by email.

neither should you ever be giving/conversing by that medium.

 

can you still access the SLC portal to see what state they think the loans are at please?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio/Shoosmith PAPLOC By email - old Scottish SLC Loan

I've never logged into the SLC portal and it's asking for letters from a secret answer that I know nothing about and seemingly no way to reset/recover it.

 

But realised that's maybe because it's SAAS that I got the loan from so I tried their website but it doesn't recognise and reference/account numbers I have as valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was still admin'd by slc which is now erudio got sold it

 

you should be able to ring slc and get access reset

however whilst on the phone you could ask them what deferment info they hold and about the reached 50 bit.

i'm not on my server so cant check till tonight.

 

whatever you do though if they say go ring erudio etc..dont!!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've emailed SLC already about the secret answer, so I'll see how that goes.

 

The reached aged 50 bit comes from the loan being taken out in 1996 and the terms stating it would be wiped after 25 years after the first payment date or when you reach the age of 50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i just check you were resident in scotland when you had the bursary?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio/Shoosmith PAPLOC By email - old Scottish SAAS Loan

Pretty sure you are correct

its not by royal mail either

they are well aware of you correct and current address?

so I'd ignore them.

 

Did you converse by email previously?? And or send your forms via email? Or royal mail?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I have conversed over email and sent them forms both in email and by royal mail, firstly with erudio, then they sent it to capquest, then it went back to erudio and now with shoosmiths for a few years now.

 

And yes they are well aware of my correct and current address, I have only ever moved once since the loan and that was before Erudio and it was all plain sailing with Saas/slc.

Edited by kints
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well next time never use email esp when entering into what seems like pointless letter tennis on your behalf.?when you had no real need to reply to them in any manner or form.

 

it only encourages them you are a mug and gives them a free way to intimidate and harass you by email.

 

get some kind of records from saas/slc on what they believe is your current status as they do still do the Adminmost of these loans .

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no not yet 

we'll cut of that methods should it ever actually progress to court.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just for ref when was the last email you sent to them ......2019 deferment?

 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they contacted me in April 2020 not long after covid had hit the UK, but before any government support was announced.

 

They knew I was self-employed so I responded how I thought it was disgusting that they were threatening people with legal action at a time when many people like me were loosing their income and struggling to pay basic bills and buy food. 

 

Looking back at it the only difference this time is the Letter Before Action, to ramp up the pressure to agree to payments, I assume.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, kints said:

yes I have conversed over email and sent them forms both in email and by royal mail, firstly with erudio, then they sent it to capquest, then it went back to erudio and now with shoosmiths for a few years now.

 

6 minutes ago, kints said:

No, they contacted me in April 2020

 

you are not being consistent here....

 

when did you last reply to any of them using email please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I've looked back at my emails and it appears I've been dealing with shoosmiths since the start of 2019 when they sent a LBA that I'd totally forgot about.

 

I replied that I didn't recognise the debt and we got into a big letter tennis over the facts.

 

They then went quiet and then contacted me again in April 2020 asking for income and expenditure details to work out a payment plan with them.

 

After I responded with my covid comments they went quiet again.

 

And now they are back with another LBA and I haven't responded to that.

 

Hope that clears it up. 

Edited by kints
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well that changes things alot.

you've accepted one before by email  and now they are doing it again ..

 

might have shot yourself in the foot until now

lets get some 1st aid done.

 

gonna be a pain to redact but i'm gonna need to see all the emails in/out please in ONE MULTIPAGE PDF from/inc  date of their last PAPLOC  

redact them properly !! read our upload guide carefully

 

you may  think this is immaterial, but its not, esp important is their and your exact wording

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the first LBA was delivered by royal mail, but I responded by email, sorry if I didn't make that clear.

 

I look at redacting the emails tomorrow, got to get some sleep now.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your client already settled one claim of an unfair contract before it reached the courts, and they know from previous correspondence that I am aware of that case. please expand upon this case you refer too.

 

You believe you had provided proof timeously to demonstrate your earnings were below the threshold, therefore a default notice should not have been issued on 15th October 2018 and the account should have been deferred. - have you a copy of the DN?

 

 

I believe I have complied with the requirements as set out in the relevant legislation to have had the loan deferred and subsequently written off upon my 50th birthday. - when did you reach 60yrs?

 

In relation to the above matter being “non-existent” or “not owed”, our client’s stance regarding these points remains as previously set out in their final response letter dated 2 September 2019, they will not be addressing these points again and you remain liable for the full balance outstanding. have you a copy please?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t have the details to hand, they’ll be on an old IDE hard disk from my old computer and I’ll need to buy an adapter to access those files.

 

But from memory, I think the case was around 2016 in an English county court. A lawyer was posting progress on a case he was working on, I can’t remember which forum, arguing that Erudios DAF forms breeched unfair contract law.

 

Erudio settled the matter out of court just before the case was heard when the lawyers client accepted an offer to backdate all his deferments and make changes to future DAF forms.

 

Very soon after all the posts relating to the case were removed from the forum, I suspect as part of the settlement deal with Erudio.

 

TBH I wasn’t sure at the time that I was going to be able to use this anyway, given that there was no ruling on the case to refer to.

 

I just wanted to make them aware that I knew they had granted deferment to somebody who hadn’t used their DAF.
 
I turned 50 in February 2018.
 
Strangely, I can’t find a copy of the default notice or their final response.

 

I say strangely because I have what I thought were all my Erudio letters in a file in date order.

 

I can only think therefore that they were sent by email and I did have a period were I had to switch email providers and email addresses because emails were being lost, and then when I switched the previous provider deleted everything.

 

I did manage to backup some of those emails before the previous provider deleted them, but again they

would be on my old IDE hard disk, so I don’t have access to them right now.

 

Sorry I know this isn’t much help.

 

How essential are these letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, kints said:

I turned 50 in February 2018.

 

good issued the default after you turned 50 when any payment is not longer required on the loans and they should be written off.

 

it's fast becoming clear that they solely refused your SLC forms as a mode of deferring to create this whole falsehood.

 

the case your refer to about the new forms is detailed in this form in many SLC erudio threads.

 

if you could go get a USB converter lead to make your old HDD drives readable from amazon or somewhere , cheap as chips and <£5.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK got access to the SLC portal and there is absolutely nothing there for the 1996 loan that Shoosmiths are dealing with, only a subsequent loan I took out in 2002.

 

What does that mean, if anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...