Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS PPI issues


davyatsea
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1127 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there.

 

in November, I received a letter from RBS stating that they were looking to pay out an amount of approx £1400 for an old PPI claim, that had not been accepted previously.

They do make reference to making checks first before making the payout.

 

i heard nothing from them until end of January when they stated that they identified arrears. The processing of this part would take another 28 days. My concern is that this was part of an IVA, which completed in November 2013 after a 6 year IVA and I have seen reports of debts being attached to IVA. However, it is over 7 years since completion, and I believed that any debts would be statute barred, if not written off law the IVA.

I have also since received a separate letter offering payout of £2700 for a separate RBS Loan.

 

I wonder, how this one will proceed bearing in mind the progress of the previous claim. potentially, we could be receiving up to £4100 in PPI Payouts, but worse case - it could be ALL put towards the old debt.

 

How should I contact RBS about this? Or should I just let it run its course? As a family, any payout would greatly help for the additional sensory needs of my children.

Also, I acknowledge (off the record) the banks position.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

. I can post screenshot of letter if need be.

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you get a certificate of competition for the IVA?

 

if so 

the money is yours. this far down the line

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So bearing in mind I have certificate of completion, RBS have said in a letter that I have arrears and that the PPI refund has been sent to the Debt Management Operations for processing. I feel I should challenge this, but not quite sure whether it should be by phone (quicker) or letter. What I don’t want to do is take up any statute barred debt, that should have been written off in any case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this still owned by rbs?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then they can offset sadly.

SB in England and wales only means can't enforce any court judgement so don't bother going there.

though the 'debt' has to be from the same A/C the PPI refund is from.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like I’ll need to do some more digging then. If I remember correctly - many years ago I know, there were a chain of loans, and recent letters have come for two different accounts. I think the way I’m heading is clarification - which, if you guys agree, I’ll do in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, davyatsea said:

What I don’t want to do is take up any statute barred debt, that should have been written off in any case.

a ppi payment into a dormant account does not reset sb, its not a payment by you.

and an sb'd debt cannot be unbarred once barred anyway.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...