Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Keyboard repair with @boxcouk taking longer than expected


DLicious-
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1172 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In the summer of 2019 I purchased a keyboard from Box with a 2 year warranty.

Just over a year later, the keyboard started having multiple failures from lights dimming to keys not registering.

 

Under warranty, Box said it could be returned to the manufacturer for repairs but I should be aware that this "can take up to 28 days to be carried out however they are taking slightly longer at the moment".

 

Over 3 months later with an old travel keyboard (not their fault the only keyboard I have around obviously) and with multiple attempts to chase down the status, I mainly got replies like "we'll check on this for you" or offering updates as soon as they had them.

 

After the vague messages and pushing for answers they have now offered I can use store credit (up to the amount I paid for the keyboard) however since I bought the keyboard in a sale I cannot get another one, nor one of similar quality or value.

 

I tried asking citizens advice and they told me it was a breach of contract due to the 28 days given in an email and I could ask to cancel the contract due to this for a refund however Box refused. Following this, citizens advice offered some help but to be honest I don't fully understand it and as such was advised to try here.

 

I would be happy to get a refund since I could go elsewhere, also don't have much faith in box anymore.

Otherwise I would be happy with a replacement but understand that may not be possible.

Either way, looking for some help as I'm confused and a little bit overwhelmed.

 

Please let me know if there's more details needed, thanks all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you link us to this keyboard please.

Are you talking about a computer keyboard – or a piano keyboard?

Link to post
Share on other sites

under CRA the issue was @Box.co.uk's problem not yours 

you should not have sent it too the manu directly but to them.

 

accept the refund but not as an in store only credit.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, who was it who advise you to try here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BankFodder said:

Could you link us to this keyboard please.

Are you talking about a computer keyboard – or a piano keyboard?

 

Apologies. Computer Keyboard 

https://www.box.co.uk/Roccat-Vulcan-121-Aimo-RGB-Mechanical-Ga_2495617.html 

found here

Advised by family member to try here

 

Box have refused to offer a refund so far, only offering the in-store credit or to wait an unknown amount of time for the repair. (Didn't see a way to edit OP so replied to others here, hope thats okay EDIT: Just seen not to quote, my bad)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my site team colleague is right, that you should have taken this up with the retailer.

However, as it is currently with the manufacturer and you have a manufacturers warranty, it might be worthwhile examining what the situation is in respect of the warranty.
You should understand that generally speaking we reckon that warranties are simply a distraction and that the liability is always with the retailer and they generally speaking of the softer target.

Have you got a copy of the warranty there? And does it say what will happen if they can't repair it? Do they then off you a replacement?

I'm asking this because if you simply sued the retailer in contract, the most likely result would be that you would be awarded a portion of the replacement value based on the amount of time that you have had the keyboard.

You have had the keyboard for 18 months. If it was the case that the normal life expectancy of this keyboard would be six years, for instance, then 18 months represents 1/4 of it and that means that in principle you would only be entitled to the value of the unused portion – which would be 75%.

Of course if you sued the retailer, then you would sue for the whole lot and hope that they put their hands up. However, if they were canny and they understood the rules relating to the apportionment of damages, then they may well realise that you are only entitled to 75%.

On the other hand, the warranty may say something about a replacement if they are unable to repair it.

Please can you check this and get back here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under my warranty Box said they would send it to the manufacturer to be repaired so I sent it to Box who sent it to Roccat, sorry if I misunderstood or caused confusion.

 

The warranty info I have is confusing to me as some sections only apply to digital content or businesses only.

The most I can see relating directly to me is

"(c) Up to six years: if your goods do not last a reasonable length of time you may be entitled to some money back."

 

Their terms also include the right to cancel a contract including:

"(c) there is a risk that supply of the products may be significantly delayed because of events outside our control;
and
"(e) you have a legal right to end the contract because of something we have done wrong."

 

The terms mostly seem unspecific (probably for a reason) and Box have denied me cancelling the contract so whether I don't meet requirements or am missing something I don't know.

 

The main issue for me has been the length of time without a proper keyboard, during which I didn't want to buy another one due to cost and uncertainty of what Box could say at any time.

 

I understand products going wrong but the fact the repair has taken over 3 times the said length is putting me in a rough position. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

In terms of "a warranty" it's interesting because they actually say that you "may be entitled to some money back". In other words they don't even pretend to offer you anything over your statutory rights which is actually very misleading of them because they say that they offer a warranty which people find very attractive but in reality, they are simply offering you what you are already entitled to under law.

Okay well if you are happy to take assertive action then we will help you. This means that you will threaten them with a letter of claim which you should send tomorrow giving them 14 days or else you will begin an action in the County Court.

This is not something that you should bluff about. Don't expect that sending the letter of claim will suddenly prompt them to respond positively and to step up to their consumer obligations. They will probably ignore you and then you will have to issue the court claim.

Your chances of success are better than 90% but you will have to do pay a coffee – and maybe a hearing fee.

If you win then you will get it all back.

As I've already explained, in principle you are only entitled to the unused proportion of the life expectancy of the keyboard. But you may as well sue for the lot and then let them argue it if they want.

I suggest that you read around this forum about the steps involved in taking a small claim in the County Court and if you are sure that you are happy to go ahead to give them 14 days notice and then you will issue, then let us know and we will take you through the next step.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally, you will not be able to claim for anything other than the value of the keyboard. So I'm afraid that if you think you can claim some compensation for being without the keyboard for a certain period of time then I'm sorry to tell you – but that's not the way it works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bringing a claim in the County Court for this level of damages is extremely easy.

We will help you all the way, of course. We help you draft your letter of claim and your particulars of claim.

You don't need to worry very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...