Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

backdoor Lowell CCJ now warrant - Old Vodafone debt - although last invoice Nil


Mopbucket
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1) the defendant entered into an agreement with vodafone under account reference        .......** ('the agreement').    
         
2) the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated.     

                             

3) the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 30/08/2018 and notice given to the defendant.                               

 

4) despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £2,308.44 remains due and  outstanding.        

                         

and the claimant claims                      

a) the said sum of £2,308.44                 

b) interest pursuant to s69 county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.506, but limited to one year, being £111.82           

c) costs   

Link to post
Share on other sites

£2300 for a mobile debt...!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And  £111.82  interest on what is most probably if not all, early termination's fees for a service charges they no longer provide or cost them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

that must have been a very expensive 24mts? contract at its start to run up +£2k!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the point the contract was terminated Nov16 to upgrade to new number and new account and line was supposedly turned off.

Who ever did upgrade did not turn off old account and seem to have carried on billing.

I have copies of last invoices no balance carried forward! 

 

If it is any help to others,  Northants bulk said they could cut & paste claim particulars and email. Which they did 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have a SAR running to VF haven't you?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the account comms log should be interesting then...:pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You sorted the ones I spotted so I hope it's all ok now.

 

Just need to see what is thought about the data they've disclosed ............

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now you have the SAR rsponse, use it to identify how the data and comms log ties in with the demands for payment that then led to the court claim made against you.

 

There's a suggestion that an old contract was allowed to run on when it should have been superceded with a new contract - you need to nail this identifying the old and new phone/account numbers, date the old contract should have ended, charges that accrued subsequently for monthly fees and late or penalty fees, etc.

 

You need to produce info to back up the assertion that the CCJ was based on incorrect data.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mop,

 

I only ran through the SAR looking for any personal data you left showing.

 

Get a pen and paper, go through the narratives and note down the date and anything relevant to what led to the debt or CCJ.

 

If there's little or nothing to do with the debt or CCJ, that in itself is important.

 

Do your best and come back with results.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do

 

dont understand  “f there's little or nothing to do with the debt or CCJ, that in itself is important.”


Narrative mentioned 6 x payments of £100  for payment plan but not £2.5k.


many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant was simply - visible info or data can be useful, but sometimes stuff that is missing can also be relevant.

 

Just do your best over the weekend.

 

Then come back with a summary of info that will help build a case to challenge the CCJ.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to backdoor Lowell CCJ warrant - Old Vodafone debt - although last invoice Nil

thread tidied.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to backdoor Lowell CCJ now warrant - Old Vodafone debt - although last invoice Nil

Dispute with Vodafone and get copy invoices last invoice 2016 no balance on old number

I have invoices upto nov16 showing no balance brought forward just before upgraded.

 

you say above you have all the bills that state a zero balance up until nov2016

are they in the SAR return too,? and all the ones after nov 2016?

 

the account number in the poc is this the same number as on those bills you have?

and the number on the pages of the comms log you uploaded?

as the comms log appears to show payments were being made right through the period you say the bills you have all show £0? then being transferred to other invoice numbers  , do these invoice numbers the payments were transferred too match the invoice numbers show £0 balance you have?

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 

 

Found some pdf old invoices which show that a debt all of a sudden was raised in January 2016 from £74.28 to £719.45 thereafter lots of one non recognisable charges. The Invoice style changed format, and billing number format (changed to a B7 prefix). I cannot see where the extra £640 came from and the plan changed. I note from the SAR the operator states there was an error in SAR states "error occurs open new profile".

 

Mobile Number  Date Plan Charge Overdue Balance
079*******7 20 March 2014 83.83 100.36 £184.19
079*******7 22 July 2014 92.91   £94.00
079*******7 22 June 2015 109.03   £130.00
079*******7 21 July 2015 56.24   £66.65
079*******7 20 August 2015 81.38   £149.85
079*******7 21 September 2015 55.14   £65.33
079*******7 20 October 2015 52.42   £62.07
079*******7 19 November 2015 58.2   £69.00
079*******7 22 December 2015 62.6   £74.28
079*******7 18 January 2016 63.73 686.72 £719.45
079*******7 18 February 2016   719.45 £838.27
079*******7 18 May 2016 162.5 1185.97 £1,348.47
079*******7 18 August 2016 56.5 1353.63 £1,513.37
079*******7 18 October 2016   1499.15 £1,534.63
079*******7 18 November 2016   1534.63 £1,585.05
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 28/02/2021 at 03:06, dx100uk said:

is the account number in their poc is this the same number as on those bills you have?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems to confirm then that they didn't close off the old mobile account upon takeup of the new one then.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 06/02/2021 at 13:47, fkofilee said:

Arh the Ye Olde Folk Law Of Crystal To Siebel Migration... 

Did you DSAR Voda? I would suggest doing it now., 

If the debt is found to be incorrectly calculated then you could potentially get a set aside at Lowell's cost if they agree with it. (Hmmmmm...)

 

Let us know what actions you have taken to get info from Voda.

 

they'll ignore you i bet

set aside via an n244 to the court but you need to prove this was as was assumed earlier 

 

@fkofilee your expertise is badly needed.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The plot thickens

 

I have a screen shot of earlier invoice B7-99496*40 with same account number showing £50.42 no balance brought forward.

 

However, based on the invoices as sent to my wife 7/11/19 after I complained to Resolver and CEBR the same invoice in different format.

 

Surely they would legally would have legally been required to credit and rebill not just revamp on old invoice number?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Multipage blanked.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...