Jump to content


backdoor Lowell CCJ now warrant - Old Vodafone debt - although last invoice Nil


Recommended Posts

looks like they've billed her for the remaining £PCM term in months of a contract that was still running and had time to go when you she upgraded to the new phone?

 

do we have the details of the old contract here? 

when taken out, how many months was it for?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi Spoke to Northants Got created case date 9/4/19, date of service 14/4/19 re Vodafone Agreement, logged by Lowell’s.   i have previously got the vodafone superuser acct ref but never

Posted Images

not after bills after any date..

 

want the details of the contract that was running when she went to upgrade please

 

 

so now we findout the phone was not working...how, phone broken? she broke it> dropped damaged? 

so there must have been a running contract 

when was it taken out and for how long

and how soon after getting that phone did it fail?

if you break a phone and replace it, thus have a new contract, it doesnt wipeout the old contract....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also what reason do Vodafone give for the sudden increase in the bill In Jan 16?

Why no ETFs in that note there?

 

I don't think you are getting the whole picture.

Screenshot_20210304-230757_Drive.jpg

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Voda charge for the new phone that was issued? Did they add it to a bill? Whats the deal here? 

Why also was the account in arrears leading up to that point. A lot of stuff in the DSAR shows arrears before that point there. 

Is the debt from Voda a mixture of old charges on this account and also the new one hence why £2300 etc?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its time to make Lowell sweat - Even if they have a CCJ with Warrant. 

You are still missing a lot of info that we are not privy too.  Stuff doesnt add up. 

I want a full bulletpoint of what you know to date based upon the DSAR, CCJ and everything else.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

Sorry for delay. Apparently broken phone had 8 months left and Vodafone agreed to wave remainder of contract if wife started a new contract (new number and new account number) in Nov 2016.

 

Any assistance would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But have you proof in writing of the above?...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

going round in circle getting no where then.

 

On 03/03/2021 at 22:10, dx100uk said:

not after bills after any date..

 

want the details of the contract that was running when she went to upgrade please

 

so now we findout the phone was not working...how, phone broken? she broke it> dropped damaged? 

so there must have been a running contract 

when was it taken out and for how long

and how soon after getting that phone did it fail?

if you break a phone and replace it, thus have a new contract, it doesnt wipeout the old contract....

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/02/2021 at 10:21, Mopbucket said:

1) the defendant entered into an agreement with vodafone under account reference        .......** ('the agreement').    
         
2) the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated.     

                             

3) the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 30/08/2018 and notice given to the defendant.                               

 

4) despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £2,308.44 remains due and  outstanding.        

                         

and the claimant claims                      

a) the said sum of £2,308.44                 

b) interest pursuant to s69 county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.506, but limited to one year, being £111.82           

c) costs   

 

8mts to run 2308/8=£288PCM...no way.

its a shame the sar does not tell us monthly account figures? or does it...

 

On 03/03/2021 at 15:16, Mopbucket said:

Hi 

 

Found some pdf old invoices which show that a debt all of a sudden was raised in January 2016 from £74.28 to £719.45 thereafter lots of one non recognisable charges. The Invoice style changed format, and billing number format (changed to a B7 prefix). I cannot see where the extra £640 came from and the plan changed. I note from the SAR the operator states there was an error in SAR states "error occurs open new profile".

 

Mobile Number  Date Plan Charge Overdue Balance
079*******7 20 March 2014 83.83 100.36 £184.19
079*******7 22 July 2014 92.91   £94.00
079*******7 22 June 2015 109.03   £130.00
079*******7 21 July 2015 56.24   £66.65
079*******7 20 August 2015 81.38   £149.85
079*******7 21 September 2015 55.14   £65.33
079*******7 20 October 2015 52.42   £62.07
079*******7 19 November 2015 58.2   £69.00
079*******7 22 December 2015 62.6   £74.28
079*******7 18 January 2016 63.73 686.72 £719.45
079*******7 18 February 2016   719.45 £838.27
079*******7 18 May 2016 162.5 1185.97 £1,348.47
079*******7 18 August 2016 56.5 1353.63 £1,513.37
079*******7 18 October 2016   1499.15 £1,534.63
079*******7 18 November 2016   1534.63 £1,585.05

 

can you scan these up please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That smells, you need a full breakdown of the debt and justification for it from Voda and Lowell. Im sorry but Voda have run you ragged. 

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told it was with Vodafone’s Directors office in 2019 and they were told not to speak to me . The girl kept repeating  “i’m sorry and was nearly in tears and i was pleasant to her”. I work in  energy provider industry where they just make up bills and say pay without actual usage.

 

The original bills showed no balance brought forward but when complained to Cebr and resolver the old invoices were changed to show balance brought forward on non descript charges.

 

My understanding is invoice numbers cannot be reamended as it is embezzlement. They have to credit and rebill under new invoices.

 

I note the invoices were web based so they could be changed when relogging into. 

 

I had a screenshot of original invoice (shown in earlier post) which was later changed 2019 to show balance brought forward but not for 2.3k. Something smells fishy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to prove things in black and white not by unproven phone conversations.

 

we are 70 posts in and no further forward from post 1.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the past i have got British Gas fined £5.4 million based on same situation for my clients based on false bills and allegations within my industry. They have to prove debt. 
 

Hopefully you can guide me who to write too. They have to prove debt. At some point i will send to OFCOM so does not happen to others and they hold on record.

 

I have  used Cabinet Office to correct matters in past (people dismissed based on investigation) although i did not have full details. They have to investigate internally when told.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't 'write' to anyone 

the only way the CCJ can be removed is by issuing a N244 set aside application (£255)

 

for this to be successful you have to meet 2 criteria..

1. prove the reason why the defendant (D), never got the original Claimform and thus lost their right to defend the claim, was not of D's (in)action, i'e might had moved since opening said contract and had failed to inform, in writing, the claimant (C) or the original creditor (before the debt sale) of their correct and current address before the court claim was issued and C had purposefully sent it elsewhere. or did not simply totally ignore the claimform having physically received it.

 

2. have a good defence against the original particulars of claim, that being you do not owe what the claimant states.

 

so....

re 1:have you moved over this period?

 

2: the issue here - it looks most probably that D did have an existing debt, increasing on a monthly basis, leading upto D requesting a new phone/contract because D 'broke' the existing phone on the existing contract which had 8mts left to run .

 

there is no doubt that the claimform figure has been vastly inflated by 'something,' be that down to a total contract paperwork error poss caused by the well known migration issue errors introduced when vodafone switched from Crystal To Siebel billing system 

 

if the existing contract had continued, then there would have been no separate  'debt' to sell on, so, there must have been a new contract entered into with the new phone, resulting in the old one being sold to lowells and them issuing a court claim.

 

why however D never received what would have been numerous letters...the Notice of assignment from vodafone to lowells, chase letters, letter of claim, etc etc is a mystery .....

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sill question here and I might get the biscuit tin thrown at me - But have Lowell given you a breakdown of how the charges were made up o a monthly basis? 

Sometimes they have a much better relationship with the OC and can get information from them better that a DSAR (Ive had this before on a previous case - Lowell pass on details that werent supposed to be seen by me ;)

 

As long as you are paying the debt to stop a Warrant then you are likely to be safe from further action - But like I said earlier - Time to make them sweat. 

 

I agree with @dx100uk - We arent that much further forward... 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't think we've actually seen the 'warrant' yet.

it scan up to PDf please

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...