Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry, trying to catch up with all the questions.. I paid by BACS - it was the only option I was given. They are based in Wallasey, Wirral, and I think they have been there for some time.  I don't think they have disappeared.
    • The social worker saw some of the photographs.  Because of the timing, holidays, everyone busy etc she said she would go by my judgement as to whether Friend should be allowed home (This was before the service was carried out)  I sent her some photos but neither of us mentioned Friend not coming home - nobody wanted him to have to stay in the care home any longer, it was totally inappropriate.  She knew I was going to take some action with regard to the service, but we didn't speak again.  
    • Hi, yes, those are the people.   It's too late to ask SS to inspect.  This all happened in a big rush between xmas and new year; I complained to the woman I'd been dealing with, she liaised with the MD and came back with the £100 offer, took a couple of days, I refused, she then said I needed to contac the MD. When I emailed him, I got the out of office message back, and then, eventually, the offer of £150 which he deposited, without my agreement, into my account..  So it all took weeks.  I have plenty of photos though.
    • Yes that sounds correct Commensurate use
    • I don’t have the details to hand, they’ll be on an old IDE hard disk from my old computer and I’ll need to buy an adapter to access those files.   But from memory, I think the case was around 2016 in an English county court. A lawyer was posting progress on a case he was working on, I can’t remember which forum, arguing that Erudios DAF forms breeched unfair contract law.   Erudio settled the matter out of court just before the case was heard when the lawyers client accepted an offer to backdate all his deferments and make changes to future DAF forms.   Very soon after all the posts relating to the case were removed from the forum, I suspect as part of the settlement deal with Erudio.   TBH I wasn’t sure at the time that I was going to be able to use this anyway, given that there was no ruling on the case to refer to.   I just wanted to make them aware that I knew they had granted deferment to somebody who hadn’t used their DAF.   I turned 50 in February 2018.   Strangely, I can’t find a copy of the default notice or their final response.   I say strangely because I have what I thought were all my Erudio letters in a file in date order.   I can only think therefore that they were sent by email and I did have a period were I had to switch email providers and email addresses because emails were being lost, and then when I switched the previous provider deleted everything.   I did manage to backup some of those emails before the previous provider deleted them, but again they would be on my old IDE hard disk, so I don’t have access to them right now.   Sorry I know this isn’t much help.   How essential are these letters?
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Welcome 2010 £9k Secured Loan subject to CCJ - mortimer say i still owe £18k?


Recommended Posts

We applied for a joint loan for £9000 in 2010 which was secured against our home,

in 2012 we were declared bankrupt but because we kept our house the loan stood

while we were going through our financial problems we defaulted on the loan.

 

We had then started making payments but with all the interest etc it went past the £9000 we originally borrowed.

We got the loan down to £6000 then hubby lost job and we seriously couldn't even afford to pay a penny and again it built back up.

 

The debt is now with a solicitor and now we owe according to them £18000.

I have requested from welcome finance every payment we have made, every statement etc they have refused.

 

We are only making payments of £65 a month going to take forever but its also gone to a ccj which should have been removed on Oct last year.

 

Where can I go for help with the dispute over the amount we owe.

Thanks

 

Solicitor is mortimore Clarke 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get an sar off to welcome they can't refuse.

 

who are mortimers client, the claimant of the CCJ and the charge upon your deeds.

 

welcome would have added £1000's in unlawful penalty fees for everything from letters/phonecalls/arrears fees/it's raining today, your fault.

when was the CCJ attained too please?
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

We didn't even know they issued us with a ccj until I today got a credit report and it comes up, we had no paperwork warning us. 

 

I don't know when the ccj was issued just now on my credit report says it gets removed oct 2020. 

 

Mortimore Clark are welcome finance solicitor as far as I am aware... Nothing to do with the ccj. 

 

I know the ccj has been added to our property as end of this year we will be in position to pay of mortgage and its £18000 more then what we owe and mortgage company said its a charge for a loan so in theory we may pay it twice if I am paying solicitors (well in small amounts) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ofcourse you wont be playing twice.

i think you dont fully  understand how a secured loan nor a ccj works.

 

You should have a charge dated from when you signed up to welcome against the property. That reminds until settled.

 

The fact someone, could have been welcome more likely cabot ? Got a default ccj in oct 2014 doesn't change anything with regards to what you ultimately pay, just a few more fee as it went to court

 

Your credit file will show who got the ccj

Your online deeds will show you who owns the charge now.

 

I suspect as welcome vanished in 2012 if not before i suggest the debt was sold on ? And the above won't show welcomes name?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right OK.. So there is nothing I can do about the extra charges, the high interest etc...

As I stated, end of year we might in a position to offer to pay what originally we borrowed

but no way are we going to pay £18000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't said there is nothing you can do?

 

get your ducks inline 1st please

we need to know who is our target .

 

please answer the questions ....go look and check

 

we are very very familiar with these old welcome loans and how to deal but need correct details checked...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

but we need the correct information.......

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will also need a copy of the CCJ and the particulars of claim on the claimform as...

you'll need the particulars of claim as we don't know the judgement sum nor if post judgemental interest was allowed.

did you defend it?

did you ignore it?

did you not get it? 

did you know nothing about it?

 

its very rare on welcome debts either taken to court by welcome (doubtful in 2013) or a DCA (more likely) 

i will suggest the debt was already at £18k before the CCJ so nothing bar court charges were added

 

please advise 

i love bashing welcome and DCA but we can't help until we know our actual target and who did what and when.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Welcome 2010 £9k Secured Loan subject to CCJ - mortimer say i still owe £18k?

I will get my paperwork out today and find out more on this ccj... As I stated my husband and I were both unaware of this ccj until we saw it on our credit file last year and was shocked as we had no paperwork, it's not as if we moved address. 

I have all the original paperwork from welcome thank god. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well get that sar running to welcome

sadly you have a shock coming upon how much of this debt will be unlawful penalties.

 

on your credit file- who's name is against the CCJ . not welcomes i bet..

did you go look at your deeds online too? 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...