Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Part of the Hermes' business model – they sell you a delivery service then botch it and then try to deny responsibility. They sell you an insurance – and then try to renege on it but keeping the money – they then make you work for nearly 5 months to get your money – and then in the end they pay you out but they try to keep back the money you spent trying to get your money back – which is really just enforcing their so-called insurance policy. This is dishonest. It is very clearly cheating their customers. I don't believe that the senior executives don't know about it. But hey, what do they care?
    • Excellent. Well done. I'm pleased for you. Yes they always try to claw back something – to satisfy their sense of pride. The money should get to you pretty quickly – they obviously don't use Hermes to deliver it.   Thanks in advance for any donation – but wait until you get the cash before you start chucking it around!
    • Well done and thank you for coming back to update us.   Thank you also for the donation, much appreciated.   HB
    • Delighted to report back that I have won my money back.    Minus the £25 claims fee but I did try (I pointed out that this amount is negligible to a huge company but a lot to me).    The whole mediation process was completed within 30 minutes, with a bit of back and forward between mediator, Hermes and myself.    The mediator was excellent and didn't put any pressure on me.    I am really pleased, it's been a long slog and very stressful, but I'm glad I persevered.    Thank you so much to everyone here for their help in getting through this! I'll be making a donation as your support is much appreciated, particularly @BankFoddermany thanks 
    • But surely shes got a point that they havent sent the t&c and prescribed terms means its not a true copy of the agreement? i thought that meant they cant proceed to court if they dont provide that stuff mentioned above
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Secure Trust Bank Loan Sold to Alpha Credit Solutions (Coast) - 2yrs of 6 but no default, correct?


Recommended Posts

Hi, 

 

I have just checked my Equifax credit file and found that I was six months behind payments back in November 2018.

However, whilst the creditor informed the Credit Referent Agency in November 2018 that I am six months late, they have been recording it every month since then as six months late.

 

My account with Alpha Credit Solutions, as of this month, is STILL six months late AFTER OVER TWO YEARS.

This means they are prolonging my default and therefore the length of time they can effect my credit file

- i.e. my account in four years time will still not be removed from the account, although it should be removed by then, 

 

Can anyone advise me? 

 

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the forum.

 

Thats because the creditor has placed an AP ( arrangement to pay marker) rather than a default marker...

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

the calendar markers are an incremental count upon how many times your have been late with a required payment to date.

it can increment to a max of 6 or a 6 immediately from the registered defaulted date which is?

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't made any payments since 2018, so I don't know why they have entered me into an AP

 

@Dx100Uk - They have made about 26 Six months late payments markers on my file, from November up to Last month, and every month- totalling 26

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are no AP markers though ?

the repeated 6 is not harming you.

the ac will still be removed on the defaulted dates 6th b'day.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ACS are a DCA who are their actual clients stated on their letters?

who is the owner stated on your credit file?

you've posted in the creation finance forum is it them?
 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so this debt was originally a pre paid bank account that went into OD or something?

 

its been sold on to foreign debt buyer , Coast, Alpha are part of the same group as well as Prime Credit.

 

as this has been sold on, the original creditor, STB looks like they've sold this on without defaulting or issuing recall notice or calling notice whatever it is. and Coast, as quite frankly as in many threads here already obviously haven't a clue about how the UK system works and have just left the marker STB put running.

 

its not really harming you

and it doesn't run the SB date nor the removal date to infinity

the debt will still be SB'd 6yrs from your last payment date/use which was?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who with STB?
 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good we got there...

 

STB should have registered a default that gives a defaulted date in the status line on your credit file on or before the sale to the Debt Buyer.

the fact that they haven't or appear not to have is in a way good for you.

 

Potentially no-one can take you to court and be successful (get a CCJ} without proof of a default notice bring issued by the OC.

 

the fact that you have a bucket load of 6's makes little difference to the SB date in that case nor harms you score anymore going forward.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So in  a way, it isn't as bad as actually having a default?

 

Because if, as you say, it won't affect my score anymore as its already six months late, but also a default would be worse in the sense other lenders wouldn't look kindly to it, and it won't knock as much points off my credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only downside of not having a default registered and showing in the overall status of the debt is it's not 100% guaranteed it will (as it should) vanish on its SB date, you might have to chase that.

but in your position, you've not moved, the bucket of 6's and on going 6 if you look hasn't made your score progressively decrease each month  either as it shouldn't.

 

just remember other creditors potential or existing cant see the calendar section of any debt unless they own it. they can only the status line of each 'account'.

 

HTH 

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Secure Trust Bank Loan Sold to Alpha Credit Solutions (Coast) - 2yrs of 6 but no default, correct?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...