Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Are you allowed to appeal if you plead guilty?   I know you appeal the sentence, but the criminal record formed from your guilt would surely remain?   I'm not sure if your able to appeal a crimianl record if you plead guilty are you?
    • DX: I did not pursue Link after I got the CCJ amended to monthly payments. Pretty sure the CCJ does not mention reviews, I do have the CCJ somewhere, I will have to look it up in storage. It is as mentioned on the thread you referenced  in your post #28. The Barclays loan was taken out in September 2004 for 60 months! Current Balance remaining approx £2K. On checking back my past correspondence with Barclaycard about this loan, there was a history of them ignoring my letters and offers to pay, and I even had problems in obtaining their bank account details for them to accept my payments! I have received strange correspondence from them too, one referring to insurance which I did not have. They seem very disorganised! Barclaycard told me to pay "Masterloan" a while back and I now receive regular statements and arrears notices from "Personal Loans from Barclaycard" clearly marked Masterloan, they changed the account reference number! I have never requested a CCA on this account. I advised them of my change of address last September, but they are still sending, until today, statements etc. to my old address! I have received 2 letters from Barclaycard Loan today though, not opened them yet!!
    • Yes, a few months ago. They wrote back saying there was no CCA and the debt was unenforcable. I then started gtting bombarded with threatening emails from their 'litigations team' which have been sent to spam. I've now recieved the letter before claim with the PAP form enclosed, but still no CCA or even a letter from them to say the debt is deemed enforcable. Thank you.
    • That's a shame but not unexpected.  I'm not sure about your assumed  questions because I haven't been to court but I'm not sure about not accepting a criminal record. It could be a language thing but it isn't your choice unfortunately.  HB
    • Have you previously requested the agreement by a CCA request ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Backdoor Erudio CCJ - old Student Loans - Already SB'd - ***Claim Discontinued***


Badgergirl25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 817 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? Erudio

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form 07/10/2020 (estimated from date of CCJ as no copy held at Northants CC

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

 

1. THE CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £4,685.84 IN RESPECT OF MONIES OWING BY THE DEFENDANT ON A CREDIT AGREEMENT HELD BY THE DEFENDANT WITH STUDENT LOANS COMPANY UNDER ACCOUNT NUMBER .....68 UPON WHICH THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN PAYMENTS.

 

2. A DEFAULT NOTICE WAS SERVED UPON THE DEFENDANT AND HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH.

 

3. THE BALANCE OWED WAS ASSIGNED FROM STUDENT LOANS COMPANY TO THE CLAIMANT, AND THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN NOTIFIED OF THE ASSIGNMENT BY LETTER. CONTACT DRYDENSFAIRFAX SOLICITORS ON 0113 823 3402

 

What is the total value of the claim? £4,685.84

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? no
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? yes
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? yes
Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? yes
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Before

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? At college
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? no
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? no
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? no
 

Why did you cease payments? no notifications sent after moving house
 

What was the date of your last payment? last differed on 22/03/2011  

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no

Link to post
Share on other sites

well once you can prove you did not defer within 6 yrs then the debt was already statute barred upon claimform issue

you could wait for the SAR

you could phone drydens and demand they set aside the CCJ by mutual consent FOC to you.

 

i expect they'll tell you the usual BS that a default registered by erudio within the last 6 is when SB runs from but thats complete BS as said.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the last ever deferment acknowledgement letter from SL ever made and received if that helps. 

 

Rather than call, would it be better in writing? I find them very intimidating on the phone and went to pieces last time after waiting in the queue so long.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ideally we like to get these fleecing DCA's on the hop when threatened with a set aside and N244 fee payment clawback , some do when confronted immediately do it FOC there and then. but as you've already phoned you might have tipped them off, but then you had no idea when you were talking about now you do.

 

your call

 

dob't forget also the damage done to your credit reputation by them raising the claim on an SB debt when they know they shouldn't.

 

just remember, if you read a good few erudio threads here, they only went for the CCJ as they knew they'd get a guaranteed backdoor one

if you'd known about it and defended they would have run away as they always do on these SB'd SLC loan 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve spoken to Drydens who refuse to admit that the loan is SB’d and refused to set aside thexpected. I expected this as you did say they would probably lie on the phone or give excuses.

 

 The reason they gave was that they wrote to me in 2017 to my old address. They also said that after my call last week that they have sent a query to Erudio. I have recorded it all

 

. I have asked for them to send me details in writing as to why they think the debt is not SB’d and why they will not set aside the CCJ as I asked.

 

I have also said that if I have to file an N224 myself that I will be claiming the fee back from them.

 

What next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Them writing to you anywhere doesn't reset the sb clock!!

 

Do you mean they say they sent the default notice there and sb runs from the dn date so they say its not thus sb'd?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh thank god for that. I’m going to pieces here. 
 

Does this mean that because they wrote to me at my old address back in 2017 that the debt is not statute barred?

I’m really confused now.

 

I’ve not given any acknowledgement, written or otherwise, of the debt to anybody since 2011 and only spoken to anyone these last couple of weeks when I got a text from Drydens and found out about the CCJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

already answered that...but it should have said doesn't...sorry..:pound:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. I've had a look and I am just over the limit for help. I do have my grandson living here and home schooling during lockdown but I don't think I can add count him as it is temporary until he can go back to school again.

 

Not sure if you need it posted on here but email received today. No mention of my demand for the CCJ to be set aside....

 

Good morning xxx

 

Following your discussion with our office on 22 January 2021, I confirm that I am looking into your query raised and will be contacting our client for further documentation in order to look into the points you have raised further.

 

I will refer back to you once I have received a response from my client.

 

Kind regards

 

Shaun Conway
Litigation Officer
drydensfairfax solicitors
Email [email protected]


Website www.drydensfairfax.com

Link to post
Share on other sites

and how did they get your email address?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where creditors agree to a set-aside application, it's called a consent order, the creditor does not have to agree to it, and all it does is reduce the application fee from £255 to £100. There is still no guarantee a judge will set-aside the CCJ with a consent order or not. You might end up paying £255 and the judge denies the application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well we might cut off that method of comms should this get silly and they do force this into court .

lets see what comes forward for now.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no let things run for now.

IMHO yours is not the next move.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will sit tight for now. Gosh, its all so damn stressful.

I am also really shocked, after you said to look on the forum at how many others are in the same situation, too.

Thank you for all the help you have given me so far, and others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA's are scammers sadly 99.9% fall for their mantra.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I received this today from Dryden with a load of pdfs of letters sent to me. Do you need me to upload the pdfs? 

 

 

Good evening

 

We email further to the below.

We received our instruction on the 6 February 2017. We have issued correspondence regarding the balance outstanding and the legal proceedings in relation to the matter. The Court would have also contacted you regarding the Claim and the subsequent County Court Judgment dated 9 November 2020.

We note that you assert this debt to be subject to the Limitation Act 1980 section 5, however, this is incorrect as the account defaulted on 9 November 2016, and as a student loan account, is exempt from the Limitation Act section 5. Documentation from our client is attached.

If you are unable to repay the balance in full please complete an income and expenditure form and return the same to our offices, as there is no formal arrangement in place.

 

You may complete this via our customer website www.drydensfairfax.com/customer, or by telephone on 0113 823 3388

 

We trust this clarifies and look forward to hearing from you.

 

Kind regards

 

Tabitha Bennett
Technical Litigation Officer
drydensfairfax solicitors
Email
[email protected]
Telephone +44 (0)113 823 3388
Fax +44 (0)113 823 3898

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Badgergirl25 said:

a student loan account, is exempt from the Limitation Act section 5.

 

that is total BS

 

yes please on the PDF but redact properly first

the date of any DN if issued numerous years after last deferment is not the correct SB date 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Yes, I know that now, as you pointed out at the beginning, and thank you as I was pretty unknowledgeable about this before your help. I also know that the date of 9th of December 2016 is NOT the date I defaulted as no correspondence/deferments were made since 2011. How are they allowed to lie like this and what steps do I take next? 

Even though I know it is BS, I am sat here shaking with worry!

I guess that is what those bullies try to achieve at the end of the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

documents please...

nothing to be shaking about, what is making you do that...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i placed your binder 1 file in your last post 

but it's TOTALLY unredacted!!

so now hidden but Siteteam can see it

 

we have to protect your ANON status under GDPR rules.

 

you must redact every page!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...