Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Backdoor Erudio CCJ - old Student Loans - Already SB'd - ***Claim Discontinued***


Badgergirl25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 825 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm not sure whether or not my defence is ready to send as I have so many different versions and time is running out. I am concerned that Default Notice line has been slightly changed from the CAG template and not sure of how this should read now. Please could you take a look?

 

As the statement was emailed to the courts, I am presuming that the defence can be emailed as well under the same case/reference number. Should I attach the last deferment letters to the pdf or leave them out as they were already sent with the statement prior to the set aside?

 

 

Claimant
ERUDIO STUDENT LOANS LIMITED
 – and –
 Defendant
xxx (previously xx
 DEFENCE OF xxx

 

I, xxx, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows;

 

1.     My last written and signed acknowledgement of the debt was by way of a deferment form send date of February 2011 directly to Student Loans Company Ltd.

 

2.     The Claimant's claim was served over 6 years from the last written acknowledgment of the debt on 08/03/2017.

 

3.     The Default Notice was issued 13/10/2016 and served over 5 years 7 months after the initial breach thus the cause of action delayed by over 5 years 7 months and the Limitations Period prolonged to 11 years 7 months which in effect allows the creditor to stop time running and the creditor having effective control of when a limitation period begins or even starts to run.

 

4.     The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. 

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. 

 

5.     The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £4707.84 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

Statement of Truth

 

I believe that the facts stated in this defence are true.

 

Signed: xxx

  

Dated: 27/10/2021

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Badgergirl25 said:

 

2.     The Claimant's claim was served over 6 years from the last written acknowledgment of the debt on 08/03/2017

 

    The Claimant's claim was issued on 08/03/2017 some +6yrs from the last written acknowledgment of the debt in February 2011 by the defendant

 

you do not need to inc any evidence AFAIK

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

n180 whats that goto to do with filing a defence ?

 

what email are you using for the court submittance?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i believe thats ok not too sure

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I received a 'Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track' now that I've defended the claim. It says to send the N180 to the local County Court and also says to serve copies on all other parties. I'm just about to post the signed court copy to them with recorded delivery. Can I email Dryden's their copy or does that have to be sent in the post as well?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they used email at anytime to you ? If so yes...if not ring them and ask is it okay and will they accept electronic submission.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb: no need to sign their copy of the DQ or put contact details    its for info only.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is the latest from Drydens...

 

Dear Madam

 

Please see attached the Claimant’s N180 as required.

 

Whilst we believe that the outstanding debt is due and owing, and are prepared to proceed to the Small Claims Hearing, we are prepared to work with you in order to reach an amicable solution away from the Court.

 

We invite you to make an offer of payment, which if accepted can be agreed by way of a Tomlin Order. this is a formal agreement which ensures Judgment is not obtained so long as payments are made and maintained. This will also save further time and costs for all parties.

 

Should you be interested in taking this route, please contact us by return.

 

Kind regards

 

Before they were insisting I owed them money, they now seem to be open to offers.  Is this normal that they are now trying to go for mediation,  knowing that I refused mediation on my N180? 

N180 drydens redacted.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep quite std for drydens ..same in just about every erudio claimform threads already here

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

the debt is statute barred.

no to mediation.

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Referring to paragraph 6...

'By 7th January 2022 the DEFENDANT must Send to the Court and to the CLAIMANT copies of all documents he intends to rely upon at the final hearing. These must be in a bundle with each page clearly numbered. The DEFENDANT MUST bring the originals of those documents to the final hearing.'

Please could you tell me what the court is expecting me to send? I presume this will include the last deferment request and also the last deferment acknowledgment received.  Is there anything else?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything the you hold or intend to rely upon to prove your claim of the debt is statute barred.

 

Though,legally, its not for you to prove it is, its for the claimant to prove its nor.

 

But this is fleecing erudio you are dealing with.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

as they always do.

 

in just about every recent drydens threads where slc and statute barring is mentioned/used.

 

its simply because their masters arrows got a appeal court ruling in about 2015 that they think resets everything on every debt with regard to SB date and DN date, it doesnt. there have been zero losses concerning that ruling in any threads since.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Please could you check my witness statement?

 

A week before Christmas my son was knocked down and killed by a taxi driver whilst crossing a road. He is being charged with death by dangerous driving. I have had my radiotherapy treatment put back a month and put on strong medication. The court has been informed by my cancer nurse to postpone this case as I am not in a good way right now. I have received a letter dated last month from the court that the judge may consider an extension to file my documents but not heard anything yet.

 

I managed to file the two deferment letters (to rely on) with the court as I had already prepared ahead of this. My problem now is the witness statement. I thought it had to be filed in February but it has to be done by 21st January which is the same day as my son's funeral. 

 

I have managed to knock up a witness statement today but I am not sure it it is any good as to be honest my mind is not really with it. I would like to get this in within the next day or two so I can get on with funeral arrangements and the legal stuff that has been thrown my way concerning the accident. It is all a bit too much right now to deal with and I feel I need to get this done and dusted to enable me to grieve and get myself through the funeral, as well enough for the next lot of treatment. 

 

If you could have a look at the statement and throw me a few pointers I would be so grateful. I don't want to give up with this and let those bastards win! 

Witness statement - Defendant REDACTED.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE THIS MORNING

 

I received a consent order - can someone explain?

 

Thanks

Proposed Consent Order REDACTED.pdf

 

 

The emails says...

 

Dear Madam

 

We refer to the above matter and ongoing legal proceedings.

 

In an effort to save further costs and time for all parties, the Claimant are prepared to discontinue the ongoing legal proceedings.

 

As such, we ask that you sign and return the attached Consent Order as soon as possible so we may lodge the same at the Court and bring the matter to a close.

 

Please sign and return by 4pm on 12 January 2022.

 

Kind regards

 

Steven Redman
Technical Litigation Officer
drydensfairfax solicitors
Email [email protected]
Direct line +44 (0)113 327 8617
Fax +44 (0)113 823 3898

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please accept our deepest condolences Badgergirl.

 

The Consent Order means the claimant has discontinued the claim...sign the consent order and return it and that's the end of the claim.

 

Have they not attached a NOD (Notice of Discontinuance) N279 ?

 

Well done and topic tile updated.

 

Andy

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Backdoor Erudio CCJ - old Student Loans ***Claim Discontinued***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...