Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the xx/xx/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the xx/xx/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, xx/xx/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Backdoor Erudio CCJ - old Student Loans - Already SB'd - ***Claim Discontinued***


Badgergirl25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 826 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sadly very few people bother to comeback and tell us!!!

 

i'd add.

 

i shall be filing my N244 on day 15 from the date of this letter..(adapt the dates below)

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on dd/mm/yyyy.

 

 2.The date of my last written deferment was the dd/mm/yyyy 

 

 3.The Default Notice was issued dd/mm/2017 and served three years after the initial breach thus the cause of action delayed by 3 years and the Limitations period prolonged to 6 years + 3 years which in effect allows the creditor to stop time running and the creditor having effective control of when a limitation period begins or even starts to run.

 

 4.Therefore the Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued was a claim in contract and was statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  in excess of 6 years had elapsed since the date on which any true cause of action for breach had accrued to the benefit of the Claimant.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the defence you would have filed had they not scammed you by purposefully getting a backdoor ccj to an old address, when 1 min free search of your credit file they could have found your correct address for the date they filed the claim, 

 

and thats what you will put on your N244

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes slightly adapted now. and just fill in the correct dates / time in years etc

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please could you check before I press send?  I've still heard nothing back from SLC about the SAR though and that was send months ago, just the statements that the fleecers sent to me. Should I remove that part? Although I do still have the original document from 2011.

 

Thanks in advance..

 

 

Good evening,

Having sought information provided by the ICO Information Commissioners Office, my last contact with anyone, which is contained in an SAR from and confirmed by, the SLC in writing, was by a deferment directly to them in 2011.

The issuance of a default notice by yourselves as a debt buyer and not from the original creditor, some five years+ after my last 'acknowledgement', is totally immaterial and does not reset any statute barred clock.

It was also pointed out to me that both yourself, working for Drydens and your Client Erudio are part of the Arrows Group, and that the Arrows Group attained some kind of landmark appeal some years previous that might have deemed that any statute barred date is measured by adding 14 days to the issuance date of a default notice. This, however, is not retrospective and does not apply in my case being 2011.

I give you 14 days from the date of this email to remove, by whatever method you wish to employ, as long as this is free of charge to me, the CCJ number xxxxxxx you unlawfully gained by default judgement on date 09/11/2020, as the debt was already statute barred.

Should you fail to do so I will, without further notice, issue a set aside and will be seeking financial compensation for the damage done to my credit worthiness and the set aside issuance fee.

I shall be filing my N244 on day 15 from the date of this letter

1. The Claimant's claim was issued on 09/11/2020.

2. The date of my last written deferment was the 22/03/2011

3. The Default Notice was issued 09/11/2016 and served over five years after the initial breach thus the cause of action delayed by over 5 years and the Limitations Period prolonged to 6 years + 5+ years which in effect allows the creditor to stop time running and the creditor having effective control of when a limitation period begins or even starts to run.

4. Therefore the Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued was a claim in contract and was statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. In excess of 6 years had elapsed since the date on which any true cause of action for breach had accrued to the benefit of the Claimant.

Kind regards,

 

xxxxxxxx

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

They have now given a different date of default that was sent to my previous address, only days different though, still over 5 years since last contact with SLC. Is there a legal limit of days/months when the default can be sent after the default has actually occurred or can they legally wait that long to restart the SB clock? 

 

Am I going to be throwing good money at bad when I do the N224? I'm getting really stressed and anxious over this as they seem to be very sure of themselves and obviously still laughing at me.

 

I'm also selling loads of my stuff on eBay to raise funds for the remainder of the set aside fee to pay in under a couple of weeks time and don't want it all to be for nothing. 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Good morning

 

Thank you for your email, the contents are noted.

 

Please find attached a copy of the Default Notice and Termination Notice issued by our client to you previously, you will note the date of the Default Notice is in fact 13 October 2016 and not 9 November 2016 as stipulated in our email correspondence below, our client provided the incorrect date for our records but this has now been rectified due to receipt of the attached copy documentation.

 

We are awaiting further copy documentation from our client, specifically a statement of account and will forward this upon receipt.

 

Kind Regards

 

Sarah Gledhill
Officer
drydensfairfax solicitors
Direct line +44 (0)113 823 3443
Fax +44 (0)113 823 3898

86195997_Term 11.11.16 edited.pdf 86195997_NOD 13.10.16 edited.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

under the rules that would have been in-place from the Information Commissioners office for that time 

a default notice should be issues within 3-6mts of its cause of action, that would be your last deferment date + it's 1 yrs time it covers you for.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

launch your N244 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I previously downloaded the form.

Are there any examples of how I should correctly fill in the boxes?

There are loads of parts that I don't understand on it even though I have read the guidance notes over and over.

 

Where does the form go to?

Also, does the hearing have be done over the phone or do I have to travel to Northampton or will it be a local court? How do I pay?

I've no idea what I am doing, sorry. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the claimant would be 'erudio student loans' only, not slc too

 

3.Set aside, pursuant to CPR 13.3, a default backdoor judgement (CCJ Number) gained by the claimant, a debt buyer, on DD/MM/YYY.

The original Creditor, the Student Loans Company were informed in writing of my correct address in Oct 2011, the Claimant chose to use an earlier address when filing the Claim. The Loan in question was already statute barred at issuance of the claim.

 

 

10

 

3.The date of my last written acknowledgement was by a deferment form to the original creditors SLC dated 22/03/2011.

 

A default Notice was issued by the Claimant date and served...etc

 

drop 8+9

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't use the phrase " Backdoor " the court won't have a clue what your referring to.

 

Andy

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't refer to them as debt buyer.....your upload at post#93 was fine didn't require any amendments apart from the claimants name.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

also the 'backdoor' and the 'debt buyer'? I've removed them and I think good to go now.

 

Is it ok to leave the questions blank that I don't know the answer to i'e' court hearings and times, etc.?

 

I presume I send this off to Northants and then just sit and wait. Please correct me if I am wrong.

n244 edited.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 Telephone Hearing,,,fee should be cheaper £100

6.30mins

8.District Judge

9./9a Claimant/address

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update:

 

Northampton CC threw the original N244 back to me last week and I had to amend it, leaving questions 4 to 9a blank and pay £255 over the phone before sending back to them via email.

 

Today I receive the following from Drydens...

 

Dear Madam

 

I write with reference to the above matter and further to the application to set-aside Judgment filed with the Court.

 

I note that within your application, you state that you informed the Student Loans Company (‘SLC’) of your change in address in 2011.

 

So we can make further investigations, kindly provide proof that you informed the SLC of your change in address.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in due course.

 

Kind regards

 

Steven Redman
Technical Litigation Officer
drydensfairfax solicitors
Email [email protected]
Direct line +44 (0)113 327 8617
Fax +44 (0)113 823 3898

 

I have no proof of this as it would have just been put in the work post and Student Loans ignored the SAR request I sent earlier this year. Do I respond to the email? Or do I ignore and let the court deal with it. It is so long ago now that all I can remember is that I wrote a list and posted a generic change of address note to loads of places.

 

I've literally just got back from the hospital today for further breast cancer tests and a biopsy and I can hardly think back to last week, let alone ten years ago. How should I proceed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...