Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell claimform - old EON Util Bill ***Claim Discontinued***


spesh88
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1049 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I have received a Claim Form from the County Court Business Centre for around £250 from Lowell who believe I owe them for a previously unpaid debt with Eon.

 

Whilst there were a number of inaccuracies and very poor practice from Eon (I didn't have access to the meters in a shared building, they AFAIK didn't provide me with any evidence of those readings either,

 

but I suspect if they had access, they didn't have to), I believe the debt may well be accurate and their claim will probably stand up in court.

 

I will be looking to get my first mortgage in the next 12 months and despite having a previously poor credit score, have built it up to be reasonably good now. Under no circumstances do I want to risk court orders/CCJs damaging this rating.

 

I have had great advice from these CAG forums and forumites before - I successfully stood up to Hoist regarding their claim of a significant debt and did not go to court (they pulled out on the last day),

 

 i am no stranger to these things, but I do not have the time to go into such detail on this one, certainly not when I can afford to pay the £250.

 

I am therefore prepared to pay this, but my question is, if I do so, will the claim process be dropped and will I therefore avoid having to go to court?

 

Will my credit rating be affected anyway? 

If my credit rating will be damaged anyway even if i paid, then I would potentially go through the detailed process of illustrating poor processes etc from Eon/Lowell to illustrate their mistakes and contest the fee.

 

Thanks in advance for any and all advice.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Completed the 'received a claim form' post questions.

 

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio Ltd

 

Date of issue –  14 Jan 2021

 

Date to submit defence  – 15 Feb (edit - dx)

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – 

 

1)    The defendant entered into a supply and service agreement with E.on Energy Solutions Limited under the account number XXXXXXXX (‘the Agreement’)


2)    The agreement later ended but a liability remained outstanding for payment


3)    The Agreement ws later assigned to the claimant on 12/707/2019 and notice given to the Defendant


4)    Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £16X.0XX remains due and outstanding.


And the Claimant claims
a)    The said sum of £16X.0XX
b)    Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.0XX, but limited to one year, being £1X.XX.
c)    Costs

 

What is the total value of the claim? ~£250

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? I believe this is the first time I have been made aware of this claim.

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes, more than once.

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Once yes, subsequent occasions, perhaps not.

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No.

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After.

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Don’t remember, but it certainly could have been signed in person at my front door.

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No, I cannot see it on creditkarma.

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Originally Eon, assigned to a variety of debt agencies (may be nameplates for the same one?) before now being with Lowell.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I think so, but not certain.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I can recall, but it is possible.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not that I recall.

 

Why did you cease payments? I did not have access to the meters in a locked room in a building with several apartments for a period of around a month. I had no way of knowing whether Eon’s readings were correct, accurate or estimated. They also made mistakes on my account adding around £900 for no given reason. I had to challenge these and they subsequently ‘credited’ my account with about £3800-900 – presumably to kind of balance out this error. Perhaps this value was from a previous apartment occupant or a misreading?

 

What was the date of your last payment? I am not certain, but it could have been June 2017

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? In a sense yes, because I could never be certain the final bill was accurate and it seemed high.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't looked at all the details you have given about the claim – but I have seen that in your first post you say that you believe you probably do owe the money, that it is about £250 and that you are prepared to pay it and you are particular concerned as to whether the claim will be dropped so that you won't have a judgement which will impact on your credit file.

The answer is yes, if you pay the sum claimed plus costs – then that would bring an end to the matter.

I suggest that you email the claimant immediately and tell them that you are paying it and that they can withdraw the action. They will want the money before they withdraw the action so you need to get that moving.

If later on you feel that there is a mistake and you shouldn't of paid it then we can help you recover it. But probably in view of the relatively small sum and the long-term impact on your credit file and mortgage hopes, the best thing to do would be to pay it. After that if there is any dispute – you will have the moral high ground

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.

 

I will email them saying I will pay. Do i need to get it in writing by reply that they will withdraw the action if I pay?

 

Is there any other specific action I need to take other than pay in the manner they request?

 

And just to add - what action do I then need to take (if any) with the claim form?

 

 

Edited by spesh88
Link to post
Share on other sites

i doubt you do owe it

EON's billing system was crap at that period

we've not lost any of these lowell old util bill claims yet.

 

pers i'd run this till the very end

they usually discontinue at the last moment

and even if you lose as long as its paid in 28days it won't show nor hurt you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell claimform - old EON Util Bill

Sorry, can you just confirm and explain this a little further.

 

Are you saying that if it goes to court and I am ordered to pay, then as long as I do pay within 28 days there will be no record whatsoever on my credit file?

 

Edited by spesh88
Link to post
Share on other sites

correct!

 

 

 

one of many wins

follow this

get your AOS and CPR done

all in this thread

lowell Claimform - OH's old EON util debt ***Claim Discontinued*** - Legal Successes - Consumer Action Group

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, have been through the links. So if i contest, can you confirm this is the process please (quoted from a different thread and post of yours I believe, I just wanted to check this is correct and relevant in my case):

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform (not sure what this is yet)
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
.

 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] asking for all relevant bills 

(So send the CPR 31.14 to Claimant address, - correct? Copy of my draft version below)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct

Can you remove our template please

It does say in red at the top not to post in the open forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - I'll go through that process.

 

Apologies, didn't see that about not c&p the template. However, unfortunately, I no longer seem to be able to edit that post, perhaps you or another site admin can remove my template?

Link to post
Share on other sites

remember you do not await any returns you must file your defence by 4pm day 33.

i notice and have edited your defence filing date of 1st feb you put in response to our questionnaire.

the corrected date is by 4pm 15th feb.

 

plenty of

lowell claimform util

threads here to read 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Topic moved to General Legal Issues Forum.....please continue to post here.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have AoS using MCOL. Slight issue in that it has an old address listed and I had no way of changing it using the system. I have emailed mcol@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk to ask them to amend/update, but don't know if that will work. Regardless, at this point I don't think it changes what i need to do - but correct me if I'm wrong.

 

So, next step would ordinarily be "get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors asking for all relevant bills" Is that correct? Having said that, I have copies of the bills from Eon, and Lowell have also sent me copies of bills. Should i still go ahead with this regardless?

 

Folowing this, my next step would be filing my defence, correct? And, now that I've done the AoS. I'd really appreciate a sanity check on when I need to file my defence by if that is indeed the next step.

 

I'll be looking at more threads. I'd like to be able to put all of this to one side until Feb 3rd (I have an absolutely crucial - 5 years of work to get to it - deadline of 2nd Feb for something I'm working on that is totally unrelated but is eating up all my time until then). Am I correct in thinking it's okay to leave this until Feb 3rd now??

 

Thanks again for your help thus far. Donation made.

Edited by spesh88
Typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

Already stated twice 15th feb

 

Send the cpr 31:14

 

You do not wait or miss defence filing date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 21/01/2021 at 12:27, dx100uk said:

remember you do not await any returns you must file your defence by 4pm day 33.

i notice and have edited your defence filing date of 1st feb you put in response to our questionnaire.

the corrected date is by 4pm 15th feb.

 

plenty of

lowell claimform util

threads here to read 

Cpr should have been sent 2 weeks ago, not take 10 days from 1st being told here to do then eventually do it

 

Dont mess around get you defence ready now.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Particulars of Claim for reference only.

 

 

1)    The defendant entered into a supply and service agreement with E.on Energy Solutions Limited under the account number XXXXXXXX (‘the Agreement’)

 

2)    The agreement later ended but a liability remained outstanding for payment

 

3)    The Agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 12/07/2019 and notice given to the Defendant

 

4)    Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £16X.0XX remains due and outstanding.

 

And the Claimant claims

a)    The said sum of £16X.0XX

b)    Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.0XX, but limited to one year, being £1X.XX.

c)    Costs

 

1. I the Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. It is admitted that I have had a supply and service agreement with EON Energy Solutions in the past. However, from 17th October 2017 I vacated the property and moved to a new address whereupon my new supplier was British Gas and therefore it is not possible to leave a remaining unpaid balance.

 

3. Furthermore, the claimant has given no details as to the breakdown of their claim what dates it relates to, so I am unable to defend specifically until the claimant can particularise and quantify its pleadings.

 

4. On 9/9/19 I wrote to the claimant ‘Lowell Financial Ltd.’ in regard to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Consumer Credit sourcebook stating “In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods. Furthermore, ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment. I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above accounts unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.” The claimant failed to respond with evidence as to my liability yet continued to send letters regarding ‘outstanding accounts’.

 

5. The claimant openly admits that they do not have access to the agreement nor was the Assignor required to retain a copy. Therefore their claim is unsubstantiated.

 

Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3)

Where a claim is based upon a written agreement.

1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing.

 

With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: -

 

a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement.

b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.

c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

6. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.

 

 

 

.

 

Draft defence above - I'd appreciate your feedback, thanks.

 

Can i submit okay via MCOL? Otherwise as my deadline is next Monday at 4pm, I'd want to send ASAP, i.e. today or tomorrow morning at the latest guaranteed next day.

 

A couple of further points/questions:

 

-          Should I remove point 2? As I did not change supplier at the original address, but moved house to a new address.

-          I do not know why I stated above in post #2 (3) that I was made aware of the agreement was assigned the claimant and given notice – I have no record of that (perhaps it was from a copy and paste). I can only therefore assume I was not made aware.

-          There is a further error above in “why did you cease these payments” which states “subsequently ‘credited’ my account with about £3800-900” it should read “subsequently ‘credited’ my account with about £750”

-          MCOL updated my address they confirmed via email.

-          I have not heard back from CPR 31.14

 

A chronology here of my records, as accurate as I can get. I'd appreciate it if someone could advise if I should remove this or if it means I should change anything in my defence.

 


Chronology
----------

21/04/17 - Moved into property
UNKNOWN  - Visit from someone (Eon rep poss) - gave my details inc. date moved in.
05/06/17 - Eon estimated bill £41.28, period 21/04/17 to 05/06/17
27/07/17 - May have submitted meter reading (which they may have used for subsequent incorrect bills)
01/08/17 - Paid Eon £41.28
19/09/17 - Eon estimated bill £916.39, period 05/06/17 to 19/09/17. They acknowledge my payment of £41.28

 

17/10/17 - Vacated property, moved to new address.
14/11/17 - Sent message via Eon website informing them of my new address and querying £9xx bill
20/11/17 - Eon estimated bill £154.09, period 21/04/17 to 17/10/17. Includes credit of £735.14. No explanation. Sent to my new address.
10/12/17 - Eon reminder request for £154.09
29/12/17 - Eon reminder request for £154.09 and threat of DCA
31/01/18 - Eon 'last chance' request for £154.09 and threat of DCA
09/03/18 - Wescot requesting payment
26/06/18 - LCS requesting payment
06/07/18 - LCS requesting payment
16/07/18 - LCS requesting payment
28/12/18 - Pastdue requesting payment
14/01/19 - Pastdue requesting payment
30/01/19 - Pastdue requesting payment
17/02/19 - Wescot requesting payment
27/02/19 - Wescot requesting payment

 

XX/02/19 - Moved to new address
27/03/19 - Pastdue  requesting payment at new address
12/04/19 - Pastdue requesting payment
29/04/19 - Pastdue requesting payment

29/08/19 - Pastdue requesting payment
30/08/19 - Lowell Financial requesting payment
09/09/19 - Sent 'Prove it' letter to Pastdue.
09/09/19 - Sent 'Prove it' letter to Lowell Financial Ltd.
16/09/19 - Lowell Financial requesting payment
26/09/19 - Lowell Financial Ltd. send copy of final bill

 

XX/10/19 - Moved to new address
20/07/20 - Lowell letter 'get an understanding of my situation' at new address
29/09/21 - Lowell letter 'get an understanding of my situation'
30/10/21 - Lowell letter 'your outstanding accounts'
20/11/20 - Lowell Solicitors letter 'notice of acting'
20/11/20 - Lowell letter 'passing to their solicitors'
19/01/21 - Lowell Solicitors 'Notice of Claim issued'

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would lose all of point 4....irrelevant at this stage.....save for later.

Your point 3 contradicts your point 2...you appear to know and tell all the details.


Andy 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, i see what you mean.

 

Whilst I suspect the claimed amount is for electricity supply yes, it is without specificity or evidence, all estimated and no clarification on addtions of £9XX or subtractions of £7XX to what they claim I owe. But I guess that is dealt with in points 5 and 6?

 

So perhaps ditch point 3 and 4 at this stage then and submit the rest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well its obvious its a Utility debt (EON)...but the claimants particulars are vague sparse to say the least. No dates of the service agreement...no debt details or dates. Is it electric or Gas ?  who knows could be anything.

 

The only date they provide is when it was sold to them.12/07/2019.

 

Your defence is due 15th Feb ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eon estimated bill £41.28, period 21/04/17 to 05/06/17..Paid.

 

Reading through your chronology for the period from 05/06/17 to 19/09/17 and you left the premises on the 17/10/17.

 

20/11/17 - Eon estimated bill £154.09, period 21/04/17 to 17/10/17. (Should be from 05/06/17 to 17/10/17) already paid £41.28 so should be £112.81.

 

From moving into the property 21/04/17 to leaving on 17/10/17. ...say 6 months residency you made one payment of £41.28

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £154.09 takes into account the previous payment of £41.28 in the bill itself.

 

The final bill lists all of the 'usage' from 21/04/17 to 17/10/17, includes the £41.28 payment, and also the £900 charge and the ~£750 credit as well as around a dozen entries for further usage to result in an end figure of ~£154.

 

But everything is estimated and there is no explanation of the £900 other than listing a number of used kw, that is later ignored for other readings nor is there any justfiication/explanation for the credit added back in.

 

Perhaps easier to scan and pdf (with identifiers redacted)?

 

Bills with account details redacted.

 

This was for a studio apartment.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.....yes its important to try to unravel the dispute before committing the defence...will look at the bill shortly

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, much appreciated.

 

Please could you remove the previous attachment though - I missed an indentifier - apologies. Will reupload with further redaction.

Combined Bills Redacted v2.pdf

Edited by spesh88
Noticed error in earlier attachment. Amended and reuploaded.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...