Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you both. My defence was as vague as their Claim. 1. I am the defendant in this claim and litigant in person. All allegations made by the claimant are denied. 2. The defendant does not recognise the alleged agreement xxxxxxxxxxx as mentioned in the particulars of claim therefore it is denied that any such agreement exists. 3. The defendant has requested copies of the alleged agreement under Data Subject Access Request, Consumer Credit act 1974 s.77/8 and Civil Procedure Rules 31.4 but to date the claimant has failed to provide a copy of this document. 4.The defendant has also requested copies of the default and termination notice for the alleged account xxxxxxxxx as required to legally enforce the alleged debt, but again the claimant has failed to provide either. 5. In addition the defendant has requested copies of statements for the alleged account xxxxxxx showing the amount of monies allegedly owed to the claimant. To Date these have not been provided. 6. The defendants view is that this claim is vexatious and an abuse of process as the claimant has failed to provide any documentation to support their claim and respectfully requests that the said claim be struck out.   As an aside, I noticed that the 'statement' they did provide had a different figure on it to what they are claiming, so I will hopefully be able to flesh out quite a bit in my skeleton argument.   Spam 
    • 80% refund sounds like a very good deal as they are entitled by law to deduct an amount from the refund to reflect the use you have had of the item over the 12 months it has been working.   So you could argue that a deduction of 20% for one year indicates that they expect it to last for at least five years, and probably longer.
    • Hi WoodDD.. Neither Case was cited in the VSC WS... however, MR D form VCS threw in VCS v Ward & Idle for the Judge to consider during the hearing. The Judge did not have time to review this. I believe he may have had a quick scan but decided it wasn't relevant at the time.. By not relevant, he didn't elaborate if it was not admissible or anything else..   Hope this helps..   Regards Tom     
    • Can I  ask what you mean by "... they recommended a firm... "?   I ask because I'm a bit surprised that Social Services are even allowed to do that.  (I may be mistaken and that this is common practice, but it seems a bit odd to me).   If they did do so and the work has turned out to be sub-standard and unsatisfactory, I would have no hesitation in making a formal complaint to the council and also to my (or your friend's) local councillor(s).  You acted on the council's recommendation and you should have a reasonable expectation that the firm recommended should be reliable and professional.  I would also insist that trading standards be asked to investigate this firm.  (Where I live our local county council trading standards department runs an approved trader database).   A complaint to the council might not directly assist you but it might help to prevent others being taken in by this firm.
    • Hello Susan, welcome to CAG.   Hopefully Paul Walton will see this message and reply to you, but it would also be a good idea to start a new thread of your own so we can advise on anything else connected with your refund.   Best, HB
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Bt issues. Payment not taken for 12 months


Recommended Posts

My son in law sent me this ....after some advice 

 

our Internet got turned off today (19th January)

I rang up and said hi can I make a payment and find out why it hasn't been taken out of my bank,

 

he said are you aware you haven't made a payment since February 2019.

I said no that can't be right,

 

I upgraded my package just over a month ago and they never said a word about owing money and just let me upgrade,

I haven't received any letter or indication that I owed any money let alone a years worth of bills!

 

I asked why no one had let me know sooner

he said we're not obliged to tell you that but said I had a valid point,

 

I asked if there's a way we can sort this out

he said best he can do is give me a good will gesture and take 1 month off,

 

I said I wasn't happy with that and we could pay half the amount owed now £380 and they would match the other £380 and wipe it off as long as I don't miss a payment for the next 6 months,

 

I accepted this offer even though I'm still unhappy purely because I need the Internet as self employed. 

 

They had cancelled the DD back in Feb,

I seriously had no communication from them and even upgraded a month ago.

 

They wanted nearly £800 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£800 for one year??

what planet are you on?

 

i will guess this is residential Broadband not a business A/C?

 

however i do find it a bit strange that a self employer person does know when or not money is going out of your A/C

one month maybe, but to not spot 12mts of not seeing a BB bill smacks of poor financial awareness..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is residential.

Not long been self employed, and in between been employed.

 

Everything was set up by dd.

BT even let them upgrade the Internet 2 months ago, but did not refuse on basis bill not paid.

No letters, nothing and normally would cut you off after not paying for a month.

 

Yes they should check outgoings, but young couple, and everything by DD

They obviously realised they made a mistake by halfing it. Just wanted advice really 

 

I would also like to point out they are very financially aware, he earns good money, just didn't spot it wasn't coming out, nothing alerted him to the fact it wasn't 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

44 minutes ago, tr79 said:

They had cancelled the DD back in Feb,

I seriously had no communication from them and even upgraded a month ago.

 

i'd be sending them an sar get all the details and see if his bank has proof of BT cancelling the DD too.

then p'haps we can make a complaint......

 

£800/12 is about £67pcm - thats an expensive deal if this is for BB only and not phone as well & at what speed - i'd expect >70MPS for that deal...was it.?

 

the issue here is if it is for phone as well BT won't release the line till the debt is cleared if he wanted & should switch - to say vodafone at <£30PCM for the same deal.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£800 pound WOW we

 

I find it hard to believe ruthless BT didn't ask for any monies for over a year and did not disconnect the line for a whole year, let the OP upgrade too !

 

Sounds like they could have signed up for paperless billing and not checked there Emails ?

 

dx100uk  is right OP will not get any more BB/phone services from another ISP until this is All paid up ...

 

"tag on the line"   https://tinyurl.com/y4tme6l4

 

 

 

....

Edited by 45002
url as ever

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, 

Thanks for responses.

they wiped the other amount if the 380 was paid, now nothing owing.

Emails, everything been checked, no demands for money.

 

Typical after 6 months they would send demanding letters.

They had tv and Internet and during this period services were not cut off at any point.

 

Also credit report shows payments made on time and son In law checked this all the time to be vigilant on credit score and nothing alerted on there.

 

They have a decent income for a young couple so set up dd and did not feel the need to check .

He is a carpenter and only 25.

At no point were the alerted that it wasn't being paid 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so coming out of this

the service is now restored and working ok and everything is good?

sorry if i've miss interpreted the outcome wrong..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. But it was the face they wanted 380 upfront before restoring any services even though it is clear it was their fault. My son in law was in a position to pay, but others may not have been and this could have really impacted on them

Link to post
Share on other sites

well use the sar info if you see anything and p'haps demand compo, though you say the bill was reduced anyway?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So bit of an update

 

Below is email sent to BT. The issue is now not the money but the impact on them reporting to credit references unpaid since Feb

This was not showing on credit karma or experian,  who he has been with for a while,  but checked clear score tonight and it is on there as missed payments. I can honestly say they had no communication from BT. 

 

 

Please accept this as a formal complaint in regards to my account. I expect a quick response considering the impact this has caused.
 
I have been a customer with BT for a while. I upgraded my broadband around November 2020 time. At no point was I informed that there was an unpaid balance on my account.  My services were recently stopped and I called to determine the issue. 
 
I was informed that no payment to my account had been made since February 2019,  and the balance was £800. You can imagine my shock
 
I have had no service restrictions, no correspondence, no telephone calls or emails to alert me to an unpaid balance. 
 
When I called I had to pay £380 to get my services reinstated. At the time I felt I had no choice as a self employed worker who needed the Internet for work. I also experienced poor communication and had to call several times for money to be taken
 
Tonight I have checked credit report and BT have reported missed payments since Feb 2019 which has had an adverse impact on my credit, when everything else is up to date. This will impact on my business and ability to secure credit and I want this resolved as soon as possible. 
 
If this is not resolved to my satisfaction, with compensation for the distress this has caused me,   you can be assured I will take this to the ombudsman. 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...