Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, I think UK will get same deal as EU.  Main reasons for this are two sectors,  Defence and Financial Services.  US have huge levels of money invested in the UK, so they have a self interest in offering a trade deal as good as the EU.
    • @labrat I'll bet it isn't the subframe itself that's broken. It'll be the subframe mounting bolt(s) that have sheared off inside it. Because the bolt is seized inside the subframe, it effectively renders the subframe scrap. I suspect the garage are simply talking in terms the average customer is more likely to understand than going into the detail of it. The Golf, Jetta and Beetle, which are all mechanically identical, are notorious for it.    A smaller independent garage may have tried to get the bolts out, but you very quickly reach the point where time/effort/cost is simply not worth it and replacement of the whole subframe is the better choice.   Of course the OP could approach a salvage yard, either local or online, and ask about the cost of a good used item, which would be substantially less expensive than what I assume is the price VW are charging for a replacement.
    • Applied for and awarded by BY in Sept 2020 still not received it yet Comments appreciated
    • Hi Slick   I am not as experienced as you is there any thing in sar that i can identify. It does not state £2.5k debt in sar. It mentions new add ons.
    • So long story short.   I had a number of re-occurring loans with Unclebuck, I made a complaint in regards to my latest one back in 2019, got to an agreement to remove default markings and charges etc and just pay the principal. Didn't pay the outstanding amount due to personal reasons, being put on Furlough was one of them.   Saw that Unclebuck went into administration, made a redress application a couple of weeks ago, got awarded £807 for previous loans (not the latest one). So I contacted the administration to confirm they would pay the redress amount towards my outstanding balance, but they said they cannot do so?   How is that fair? I get they they can't pay me any cash, but surely they should be able to write off the current outstanding amount, it has to work both ways right? This was the latest response I got, so far no reply from their solicitor yet.   "Whilst I note your comments concerning your desire to set off Redress due in respect of unaffordable loans against your current loan that was not eligible for Redress, unfortunately the Administration precludes the position of set off until the Administrator makes a declaration under Rule 14.29 of the Insolvency Rules 2016. This declaration has not been made by the Administrators and will not be made as there is no distribution or intended dividend to be made to creditors in this particular Administration. Whilst I sympathise with your position, you will appreciate that the Administrators are governed by statute and cannot contract out of it.   I promise to speak to our solicitors to see if there is any room for manoeuvre on this matter and will come back to you afterwards, however I feel that it is unlikely. As you will appreciate making an exception for you may open the Administrators to claims from other customers in a similar position to yourself and indeed from other customers that do not have the benefit of another loan to set their Redress off against."   And to further add to it, I got an email today saying they transferred the loan to a collection field agency "Conexus Recovery and Field Services Ltd "  
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

3 x Paydayloan defaults - firms in administration


Recommended Posts

I have 3 payday loan defaults listed on my credit file from 3 companies who have recently entered administration, Wageday Advance, Piggybank & Moneyshop.  Am i correct in assuming these can be removed due to this ?

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

wherever did you get that idea from

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"If the company who reported this info doesn’t exist anymore – Then you have a right to have the information removed by default. Its only in the case of where it hasn’t been picked up by a Debt Purchaser."

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406261-credit-reference-agency-guide-the-a-z-of-understanding-and-managing-your-rating/

 

Bottom of page 19.

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

i will guess what you are saying here is you have 2 defaults for each PDL?

one from the debt purchaser

and

one from the original creditor

showing on our file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No just 1 default from the original creditor of which are now in administration

 

 

 

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, clint1974 said:

I have 3 payday loan defaults listed on my credit file from 3 companies who have recently entered administration, Wageday Advance, Piggybank & Moneyshop. 

in post 1 you said 3?

 

so this 1 , does it have a duplicate entry from the dca which shows the same amount and the same defaulted date?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 pdl's wageday advance, piggybank and the money shop

 

on further investigation only the piggybank one is actually showing as defaulted

no dca entries on credit file for these

all 3 have last year gone into administration. 

 

ACI (DCA) have been chasing the defaulted piggybank loan wageday & moneyshop nothing yet.

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so back to what you put up...from our guide 

the last bit says...

3 hours ago, clint1974 said:

"If the company who reported this info doesn’t exist anymore – Then you have a right to have the information removed by default.

Its only in the case of where it hasn’t been picked up by a Debt Purchaser."

 

so the answer remains as post 2 ...no.

you must read things carefully...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to 3 x Paydayloan defaults - firms in administration

So Wageday Advance & Moneyshop as far as i am aware haven't been assigned/sold to any DCA as i'm aware so technically can be removed but piggybank as it has been sold to ACI cant, correct ?

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

no.

if the debt has been sold and you have received a notice of assignment from the DCA to say so

and if there are duplicate entries on your credit file

i'e as i keep saying

the same debt is listed twice on your file and defaulted  ..thus you have 2 defaults from the same debt (not that that makes any difference anyway!! it doesn't harm your score twice)

 

so no you cant get them removed.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So then the guide is incorrect. I don't have duplicate entries on my credit file even from the piggybank loan which is the only one of the 3 that i'm aware of being sold.  I'm subscribed to all 3 so have checked them all.

So 2 of the 3 PDL's are not with DCA's and the same 2 companies are in administration and from what i read that means they can be removed.  I will re read the guide but am sure that applies.  

 

"If the company who reported this info doesn’t exist anymore – Then you have a right to have the information removed by default. Its only in the case of where it hasn’t been picked up by a Debt Purchaser."

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure that last line is wrong

 

and should say has not hasn't

 

just because a company no longer exists it doesn't change the fact it is a true reflection of how the account was operated.

 

i will ping this to the author

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So for clarification...  The company does still exist because its being wound down after going into administration and reporting will still continue until either;

 

- 6 Years expire

- OC decides to updated to Partially Satisfied / Satisfied or Settled or remove it completely. 

- OC decides to sell the account as part of debt sale where the old entry will transfer over to the DCA

 

There have been a few lenders where this occurred to in the past - These are commonly referred to as "Ghost Companies" - I have had this situation with a lender.

They disappeared into the ether with a default on my CRA - I spoke to the CRA and they advised as the company had ceased trading and as its a "Ghost Company / Reporting" that it would be removed.

And that it was... But the clue here is that the lender is actively updating it. In administration this still occurs.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep in mind also that the companies in administration are currently at the moment putting plans in place to change reporting depending on IRR Claims etc / Criteria set out by the Administrators. 

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...