Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Recommended Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello   Thank you for the help you are providing on this forum. I have read around the various threads for Hermes and have found the advise very useful.   I have a case against Hermes for a lost Item where they have offered the standard £20 plus postage refund.   13th January - I sent my Car's original ECU to a technician for repair via MyHermes.  22nd January - As consignor, opened a case for a parcel that had stalled on Hermes tracking. 25th January -  I chased the delivery via telephone and was advised the item had been lost. On the same day, I sent my first letter through their automated system where I offered an reasonable settlement for loss of property.  26th Feb - I received the below response from MyHermes     Thanks to the information on this forum, I'm sure they are 'Pleased' to confirm and 'Happy' to pay this low amount for their breach of contract. In addition I am also aware that there is no need to insure against their negligence for loss. I'm now at the point where I need to decide whether to accept their offer and walk away or push this further and take them on.   If I choose to pursue this matter, I understand that 1) I need to send a letter of claim and give MyHermes 14 days to respond. 2) Register on the Money Claim website and complete particulars of claim The particulars I should file would be:     Firstly, Have I understood this correctly?   Secondly, I was able to rectify the situation of my non-function Car because I had a spare ECU and taught myself the skills to get it up and running. Therefore, the only evidence I have of the replacement value is from prices published online at resellers. i.e. I don't have receipt for replacing the lost item. Would this go against me?     Many Thanks       first letter.docx
    • Morning all,  hope you are all keeping well and safe, thoughts please, a company called “capquest” sent me a text message on Sunday advising that I need to speak to them “about my debt”    i briefly looked online and it appears as they are a debt collecting agency which is very odd  - I am lucky that aside from my mortgage I have no other open/rolling debt.  I have paid off years ago the loan I had for the house refurbishment. No balances on credit card,  no defaults, no CCJs. Also  I have never dealt with Capquest.    are they scammers?    Have they just bought mobile numbers and they are changing it by sending text messages?   should this be reported?    Cheers    Red11    
    • Morning.   Had no response to any info request at all, other than a letter saying information had been requested as it wasn’t currently held. Given that 28 days have passed, next step is to approach the court, I believe? Or should I be allowing some extra time for any post to arrive, given COVID?   MCOL still shows we are at the defence stage in the recent transactions box.   Thank you for your advice.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Cash card account unauthorised overdraft default .


Recommended Posts

Hiya 

 

Many years ago on this site there was something called default removal templates to send to creditors . In the form of letter one,  then a second letter then a third . 

 

Sometimes these were successful sometimes not I was just wondering do these things still work

Link to post
Share on other sites

i believe there was a time when they were popular some  +10yrs ago but we never officially endorsed them as it was a bit of a myth 

and they were linked to freeman of the land twaddle. if a default did get removed it was typically because of another reason not as a result of that 3 letter process.

 

what's your issue and with whom

spill the beans

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 

 

I have a default on my account from bank of Scotland.  

 

I had a account with them for a number or years. 

A payment came out of my account which I didn't recognise and they refunded me. 

They then took the money back. 

Leaving my account in the negative balance. 

I buried my head in the sand and eventually it defaulted . 

 

It turns out the payment I didn't recognise was mine

the company just used a different name.

I never said this to bank of Scotland I just ignored their letters. 

 

My question is,  is their default allowed.

My bank account was a cash card account which is giving to anyone due to my credit rating .

There was no credit facilities available such as overdraft or cheque book.

It was simply a basic account to receive and withdraw funds.

 

On that bases I don't think I ever entered Into a credit agreement .

The funds owed to bank of Scotland is because of a disputed amount .

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely to register a default there needs to be some sort of credit agreement? 

 

A cash card has no credit features on it and no scope to every get any on it . 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope.

you went into an unauthorised OD that you didn't clear, they were quite correct to issue i think its called a facility notice under the section 5  CCA.

 

all your threads are concerning defaults recently, what is your real problem?

why are you desperate to get defaults removed?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...