Jump to content


Parking Control Management invoice for moving house


Recommended Posts

PCM are not and can never be DCA as defined and register with the FCA...:crazy:

a landowner does not and can never 'fit the definition' of a creditor, they did not issue the invoice..:crazy:

every single Parking Management contract has the relevant line that enables a PPC to issue and collect charges, else there would be no point to it:pound:.thats the single most important part of it...as to how PPC's scam mugs.

 

you are getting confused with the ability if the contract states 'taking legal action in their own name'.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

They failed under  PoFA Schedule 4  section 7 [4] (4)The notice must be given— (a)before the vehicle is removed from the relevant land after the end of the period of parking to which the not

just type no need to hit quote...   pers in your case i'd await and see if you get a letter of claim THEN i'd reply as we do here in a snotty letter.   dx  

Their PCN is wrong. They state that they are able to add extra charges even when they are pursuing you as the keeper.  Could you also please post up the windscreen PCN and I don't suppose you hav

Posted (edited)

Received a Court Claim From A Private parking Speculative invoice?? - How To Deal With It HERE***Updated Aug 2016***

 

 

Quote

- Lack of contract – A recent tax case suggested that a parking company was not capable of entering into a contract with motorists because it did not have authority from the landlord to give the motorists the right to park. The company had authority to manage the car-park generally but this was not enough. Accordingly the Private Parking Company (PPC) should be put to proof that the landowner has given them proper authority to enter into a contract with the motorist.

 

Edited by FruitSalad1010
Link to post
Share on other sites

the op has not received a court claim.

but at every court claim you should ofcourse put them to strict proof the contract is current and paid for in the current year.

you need to look carefully, that sticky was written in 2016 and is somewhat out of date.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, FruitSalad1010 said:

As has been pointed out in many of these cases, usually it is the landowner not the DCA (in this case PCM) that are entitled to recover unpaid parking charges unless the right is specifically passed on in contract.

 

So while the landowner fits the defintion of "creditor", should the PCM have no legal power to recover unpaid parking charges they are not deemed a creditor and therefore could be held liable under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

A rather protracted argument of little practicle value for the time being, but in my opinion noteworthy if it turns out later on PCM had no legal right to act as a creditor.

 

It could be stated that until PCM are proven to have a legal right to act as a creditor then their continued communication will be treated as harassment until indicated otherwise, or that the right is reserved to make a claim under the 1997 act if it later on turns out PCM had no right to act as a creditor.

 

Thanks for all the help, folks, in terms of whether to reply or allege harassment - well being harassed itself it is advised anyway not to respond to them in the first instance. So as Fruit Salad and DX says ignore until letter of claim and not confirm ID which is what I will do.

 

As I said I note it here as part of the timeline, and just keep records of it for later if necessary. Not intending to do anything with it just yet.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...