Jump to content


Parking Control Management invoice for moving house


Recommended Posts

You are right if it was a windscreen ticket. It looks as if they didn't think it was a w/s ticket which is why they sent their first one within fourteen days. This would have been correct if it had been taken by a camera and mailed to you.

But with them either way was wrong since they gave it to you on a main road. And if it is a w/s ticjet it has to be affixed before you drive away.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

LookforInfo thank you for help.

 

They can't have it both ways, she photographed the car but then when challenged about as I was loading chattels into van and car I moved the car

 

she crossed to the other side of the street to try and hand me the invoice.

 

I refused to take it so at no time was anything affixed to windscreen.

 

As to the NTK I've only got one I believe

 

Alleged parking was 12.12.20

 

NTK was posted 13.01.21 and give 15.01.21

 

Second letter is the Debt recovery letter dated 17.03.21. That's all so far.

 

Edited by lordloz
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

If there was no windscreen ticket then the NTK should have arrived within 14 days to be PoFA compliant. If there was a w/s PCN then the NTK should arrive after 25 days which yours did. So they are acting on the pretext that there was a w/s ticket despite the fact that you refused to accept it and you had driven off the relevant land before the ticket could be attached.

OK I understand it. And ihe way it was done  is still wrong.

 

 

Edited by lookinforinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

not much to go on there really, if you equate this to how council wardens can operate , once the ticket is written, service does not need to be completed.

if the NTK did arrive after day 29 then pofa is met

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pcns are compliant but the rule on w/s tickets is that they must be placed on the w/s at the time or handed to the driver when the vehicle is parked. And of course this ticket was not even placed on the w/s  nor was the attempt to hand it over even be on relevant land. But the difficulty is whether the parking attendant will admit to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure if that's ever been tested in court regarding a speculative invoice.

 

and if it ever was, i would expect it to be adjudged the same as Penalty Charge Notices, an existing benchmark. the ticket does not have to be attached nor handed, merely the process of one being 'produced' had gone beyond some point, that point i'm unsure of.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lookforinfo, correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that just related to official civil enforcement officers, i.e.  Council Traffic Wardens,  who are employed by an enforcement authority. That is local councils for instance or a private company employed by a council.

 

PCM are a private company trying to obtain payment from a speculative invoice and have no authority to issue PCN's.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've unapproved your previous post  lookinforinfo ......save any confusion to users reading this topic.

 

Andy

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had another demand letter last week which is their standard nonsense from Trace so won't bother posting it up, however today's development was interesting when I received a text from them......

 

Looking at other posts on here with these clowns that's getting into bordering into data protection/harassment area..... 

 

will keep posting until/if i get the letter to claim but just deciding whether to block or not, my feeling is to leave it open, screenshot all messages and keep if necessary if I have to answer the LTC...... thoughts welcomed 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, honeybee13 said:

How did they get hold of your mobile number, LL?

 

HB

that's interesting isn't it......I haven't provided them with anything, no replies at all ....my real life name is unusual so I expect it's not a huge task to find me...but....I find that intriguing that they have started to text me when never entered into any conversations or correspondence with them...

Link to post
Share on other sites

tempted to block but also to leave as a record of harassment and possible data protection breach, as I saw in other posts similar had happened 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...