Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pet Sitting Business - Client Refusing to Pay


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I run my own fully insured pet sitting and boarding business.

I was contacted on the 3rd November by a man who needed me to board his two rabbits due to an emergency situation.

The RSPCA were collecting his pets and would drop them to me the following day.

 

I emailed him the agreement form which he text in response to the next day saying he couldn’t fill them in on his phone but the rabbits were already with me.

 

We agreed a rolling contract of fortnightly payments which happened up until the 27th November.

At the beginning of December he messaged me asking me to contact his partner to arrange collecting the rabbits.

I did but she didn’t reply until the following week on the 18th asking if she could collect the next day and how much she owed me.

I gave her the price and she said she’d collect the next day.

No collection happened or payment.

 

As it stands at the moment she is still refusing to pay,

I’ve had every excuse from her mom being ill to her sending me a cheque which never came and I still have the rabbits.

I spoke to the RSPCA officer involved today who said they’d provide a statement saying the owner agreed to pay me.

 

I messaged the owner tonight explaining I’d spoken to the officer and would be looking into proceedings to claim my money and that if they weren’t collected in 7 days the rabbits would be considered abandoned and signed over to the RSPCA and she became very aggressive towards me. 
 

Where do I stand with this please?

They owe me over £300 now.

I’ve recently lost my dad suddenly and I really don’t need this. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the RSPCA arranged the rabbits to become your responsibility

pers i'd issue them with a letter before action

let them argue it out.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that I take a different view to that of my site team colleague above.

On the basis of what you say, I'm not sure that the RSPCA can be held responsible – it seems to me that they simply put the owner in touch with you and you have your own agreement.

Clearly it's a difficult situation.

In terms of the rabbits, I think you are handling absolutely correctly and you have given them adequate notice and I think you are entitled to turn the rabbits over to the RSPCA as you propose. However, I can imagine that the RSPCA will want to know who the owners are and I can also imagine that the rabbits will end up being given back to the owners without any requirement for payment.

Naturally, the RSPCA are simply concerned with the welfare of the animals and if they are satisfied that they are well cared for by the original owners then they will consider that they've done their job.

This leaves you out of pocket.

Presumably you have a residential address for these people?

Link to post
Share on other sites

While in that case it's going to be very difficult to take a court action.

I suppose the first issues to deal with the rabbits and if you don't want to keep them then get them over to the RSPCA as quickly as possible. If you are unable to tell the RSPCA who the owner is then it seems unlikely that they will find their way back to those people which may provide some satisfaction.

In terms of the lost money, I'm afraid that if you don't have an address then there is very little you can do – other than to keep your eye open and maybe you will come across it one day.

It seems to me that these people have effectively abandoned their pets – and although it's hard on you, I suppose that it is better then them being simply left in a ditch or put in a bag and thrown into a canal.

I'm sorry but I am not really sure what else to advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that's even more difficult then because the RSPCA will simply be concerned with the welfare of the animals and they may consider that it is safe to turn the animals over to their original owners – which then leaves you out of pocket. The RSPCA won't be prepared to give you the details of the owners.

I'm afraid that you are in a difficult situation unless you want to hang onto them which I would say that you are entitled to do and you can even put them up for sale to a responsible purchaser. I don't know if there's anything special about the rabbits – although personally I feel troubled by the idea of selling animals around.

I really don't see how you could bring an action against the RSPCA as suggested by my site team colleague. It certainly seems to be the only available option that I can't see how they carry any legal obligation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t want to bring action against the RSPCA. They’ve done nothing wrong and both the owners and myself knew that the RSPCA were not responsible for payment. 
 

My main query is how to go about getting the owners to pay. Who can I contact for advice on this? Surely they can be issued with something official from somewhere to say they owe me money? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that if they are avoiding payment, the only way to get them to pay is to issue legal proceedings. This is very easy to do and you would begin a small claim in the County Court and on the information you give here, your chances of winning are better than 95%.

The trouble is that in order to issue a claim, you have to have a valid address so that the knowledge of the claim comes to the notice of the defendant.

Of course you could issue the claim at their old address and hope that it is forwarded on but of course, as you are aware that they don't live there any more – strictly you shouldn't do that.

However that would be the way forward, to issue the claim to their old address and then if they failed to respond within 14 days of the date of the claim you can enter judgement.

The problem with bringing County Court claims – is that winning is one thing and can be quite easy – but enforcing the judgement can be a completely different problem. In order to enforce a judgement you would absolutely need to know their existing address. If you can't enforce the judgement then you have a symbolic victory but it doesn't mean that you will get your money and also you will be out of pocket to the extent of the claim fee which could be an additional 50 quid or so.

If you did bring the claim and you one, and you weren't able to track them down then you could enforce the claim against some of their belongings – and the only ones available, it seems to me are the rabbits! But you already have those and of course I'm pretty certain that they aren't worth the kind of money that you are owed.

I'm afraid that without the proper address there is going to be very little you can do. If you go and see a paid adviser, you will get the same advice but also you will end up paying for it and for any letters which are written.

I can see that you are very frustrated by this – I think that you are facing a dead end unless you can find a way to persuade the RSPCA to let you know the new address of these people. Maybe if you told the RSPCA that you wanted to deliver the rabbits to the new address, they might disclose the address to you. In that case you could move forward and bring a claim.

We will be happy to help you – but although your chances of success are extremely good, we would want to caution you against wasting your money on something that you can't enforce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this was a company, we might be talking about embarrassing them on social media, Facebook etc if they're on there. This may or may not help you get the money.

 

BF is the expert, I'm just throwing this in to see if it could work with private individuals.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suddenly realise that in your first post, you suggested that there was an absence of a written agreement.

This would not matter. Binding contracts do not need to be in writing unless they are for shares in companies or for land/houses.

A verbal contract is perfectly binding and so the lack of a written agreement would not get in your way. The problems which I have indicated in my previous posts pose a much greater problem for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always send a letter to their former address containing a cheap GPS tracker and hope it's forwarded to their new address. If it is, bingo, you know where they live. If not you've only lost a few quid.

 

I should say, I've no knowledge around the legalities of that. Hopefully BF or another site team member can shut this idea down if it's a no-go.

Edited by theberengersniper
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it could identify the actual address then I suppose it would be worth considering but I don't think that they are accurate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, provided they people in question now live in a house with decent GPS signal, it'll be accurate to around 3m; accurate enough to establish their address. If the signal is weak it'll still be good enough to identify the address to within a few houses and certainly the street.

 

Provided the folks haven't moved county, if there was any doubt over the specific house, the OP could always go door-knocking or name plaque hunting. Clearly the OP wants to avoid an on-street argument, so it would be advisable to retreat immediately following confirmation of the house, but it's a possibility.

 

GPS trackers these days are inexpensive and would comfortably fit in an envelope or small package. At least then a LBA could be sent with confidence it has been served on the intended recipient.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a long shot – a very long shot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Do Not send a letter whether to old or new address with a GPS Tracker in it as that could backfire so I do have to air caution

 

Whether the GPS Tracker is for Business or Personal use under the Data Protection Act the information gathered from a GPS Tracker is classed as 'Personal Data' which must be dealt with in accordance to the Law, therefore you would need to have informed the individual and have their consent to use that item.

 

 

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about telling the pets' owners by message that you're not happy with their attitude about non-payment and not giving you their new address.

 

Accordingly, you'll have no option but to use their old address ( which you're entitled to do - debt chasing solicitors do this all the time ) to issue a court claim to recoup your losses, issued to their last known address.

 

So they either deal with what they owe (you could negotiate  a compromise maybe); or deal with the court claim if they have access to post at their old addess; or end up with a CCJ against them.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...