Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Excellent news. All of these councillors have an interest in their constituents not falling into poverty, unlike the collections and call centre staff. 
    • The gaming giant is offloading the Venetian in a $6.25bn deal to invest in Singapore and Macao. View the full article
    • ok best shot..   you need to reply to that letter of claim.   for debt covered by the consumer credit act:   send a cca request along with the completed form:   NOTE ONLY USE THE ATTACHED FORM below DO NOT USE THE FORM SUPPLIED BY THE DCA IN THEIR PAP LETTER!! DO NOT USE OR GIVE THEM YOUR EMAIL/PHONE NUMBER. USE ROYAL MAIL 1st class - get free proof of posting from any PO counter   box D tick   I dispute this debt because ..i refer you to our previous communications and my previous respond to your previous Letter of Claim. i am over 50yrs and have deferred as required to meet the age write off.    box I tick   I also require you to supply the following..   All signed agreements Copies All my deferment sent to either yourselves, the SLC or the SAAS to date. Copies of all communications bothways in whatever format to/from Erudio, Capquest, yourselves and Me A copy of the any Default Notices A copy of the Notice of Assignment A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the sum you allege is owed has accrued detailing: All Transactions. Any additional charges, be them by the original creditor or you xxxx the debt purchaser or any predecessor DCA. Details of all contractual interest added by whom and on what date. List of ALL Payments made toward the Agreement   no need to do the financial statement etc anything else or send anything else bar the above do NOT give them your phone nor email PRINT your name never sign the form   staple the £1  PO to the CCA request and send it to the debt purchaser return the completed PAP form below to the solicitors that sent it to you attain free proof of posting for BOTH at any PO counter 1st class mail will do. recorded is a waste of money   reply form PAP.pdf
    • There's more support for many in the Budget, but for some it still falls short. View the full article
    • no you are kidding me...   they can't be that thick surely... could be game over if they've faked it.   can you attach it to a private msg to me please.  
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

PCMUK - Windscreen Ticket - Residential Property (wrong space) ** WON** cancelled by PCM


Recommended Posts

Hi, 

 

I recently received a windscreen PCM ticket while car A were parked within a residential property. The reason for issue was "Parked without clearly displaying a valid PCM UK LTD permit (at time of this enforcement) 

 

Car A wasn't parked in my allocated parking space (space A for example) as per my leasehold agreement but parked in (space C) and was not showing the permit due to being in the process of selling cars. I literally parked car A for a few hours while car B was awaiting collection to be sold. So either way one of the cars would have not been showing the permit. 

 

Where do I stand with this? Do I just pay it due to my car not being in my agreed parking space? I did try disputing the ticket online explaining that I do indeed have a permit it just wasn't on show, but this was rejected. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

Certainly don't pay money until we've had a good look at this and even then we rarely avoid paying.

 

Please let us have the details from the forum sticky and we can start looking at what's happened.

 

 

Best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 The date of infringement?

02/01/2021
 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?]

Yes - Unsure if i can recall what i sent, was done via their online platform

 

has there been a response?

Yes - Attached PDF

 

have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days]

No
 

what date is on it

N/A - For now
 

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence?

N/A - For no

 

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?]

N/A - For now
 

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK,

did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process?

[it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances]

N/A - For now
 

5 Who is the parking company?

PCMUK 
 

6. where exactly did you park?

Clifton Close - Bicester, OX26

Response.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

await the notice to keeper

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once NTK arrives come back, there are ways and means with residential parking  to undermine the flreecres.  Is the development gated, or any restriction on entering it?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, brassnecked said:

Once NTK arrives come back, there are ways and means with residential parking  to undermine the flreecres.  Is the development gated, or any restriction on entering it?

 

No restriction on entering 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, that's great. Don't take any nonsense, if you get anything else come back here and we'll help. And tell your neighbours. :)

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, honeybee13 said:

Well done, that's great. Don't take any nonsense, if you get anything else come back here and we'll help. And tell your neighbours. :)

 

HB

I think ill be getting a sign made - "do not pay any parking ticket, visit the below" with a lovely QR to this forum 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to PCMUK - Windscreen Ticket - Residential Property (wrong space) ** WON** cancelled by PCM
  • FTMDave changed the title to PCMUK - Windscreen Ticket - Residential Property (wrong space) ** WON** cancelled by PCM

Excellent, likely they knew it would be a potential loss in court there are plenty of Residential Parking cases where Supremacy of contract trips the Fleecer's up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...