Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cabot/MBNA card Debt - Begging letter received om Mortimer Clarke


jasmineuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a quick question. I'm pretty sure my MBNA account has only had £50 charges (and that was recently - 2 late payment charges). Do MBNA pay up fairly quickly or should I not waste my time pursuing £50? If so , do I write to Chester with a cheque for £10 for my statements?

Jas

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry I didn't mean to sound so cavalier about fifty quid! Do I send the request to Wrexham or Bolton (which is where to send payments)? And when claiming, do I inclu the £10 its cost me to get details of their charges?

Jas

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 years later...

this charge, is the house jointly owned?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, we jointly own the house but as tenants in common so my half only is affected, so I believe.

 

Our house has had few repairs done over the past 8 years and it isn't worth much more than our mortgage. What happens if my half of the equity isn't enough to pay off the charging order? Interest is accruing on the debt at 8% p.a.

 

Are my debts which Cabot are trying to claim from me enforceable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so its a restriction k which means all you need to do is inform them AFTER the sale..though on them theres no money left..

 

as for the enforceability

time to get some CCA request running for each one!!

 

I would gather that by that comment you've been reading around

and the penny has dropped that these DMP companies never check the enforceability of any debt

esp those sold for peanuts to debt buyers

 

and you are sadly realising you might be a multi debt cash cow to these powerless DCA's??

they are not bailiffs..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

surely you mean CCA requests not SAR?

 

 

are you sure its MBNA named on your charging order

and NO there shouldn't be ANY INTEREST unless the judgement allowed it

something smells here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I did mean CCA requests. My apologies.

 

The charging order is in favour of Optima Legal but it concerns an MBNA credit card. I thought that charging orders carried an interest rate of 8% per annum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not a charging order though is it

its a restriction K

which ive talked about before

 

pers id stop paying that too.

theres no need

 

if companies that you sent CCA requests too have FAILED to responce in 12+2 WORKING days

you can stop payments too them.

 

that's why I said dump payplan totally

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I did mean CCA requests. My apologies.

 

The charging order is in favour of Optima Legal but it concerns an MBNA credit card. I thought that charging orders carried an interest rate of 8% per annum?

 

Charging Order or Restriction are merely to secure the judgment...there is no financial amount or interest attached to the Order...the judgment defines what you pay.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

More history please. What does it relate to. When was the agreement taken out?

 

Edit: just seen its 03. Nope. Not enforceable at all. Although youd need to send a CCA request, not a SAR to check if they actually do have a full copy. SAR will rarely ever make them look for it

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where's the rest of the SAR?

 

Oh and that's a tiny bit of an application form, not a CCA.

 

Have they had the full 40 days in which to supply all the documents?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

had to hide the attachment too

as you've not redacted it properly like the other one

we can still see your name address etc.

 

 

you say that came from an SAR to MBNA not the CCA request to the DCA?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what ever paperwork you get from the OC is immaterial

the DCA must comply with the CCa request

and by the looks of what MBNA has its bog roll.

 

 

got any penalty charge [£12] and PPI in those statements to reclaim?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I thought I'd hidden my details.

Yes, it came direct from the OC.

I got nothing from the DCA.

 

No, I have already checked.

So MBNA and Yorkshire have no say in what happens with the DCAs?

If that's the case, aren't the DCAs stuffed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you're learning ....:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Help!

 

I've posted before about my debts and had three written off (or almost - they say they aren't enforceable but would appreciate me making further payments!). I have one outstanding for an MBNA credit card. It went to Court quite some time ago and Optima Legal Services got an interim charging order against my property.

 

I wrote to Optima Legal Services in June, asking for documentation which I had signed and received no reply.

Then the other day I got this letter (attached) which says that they have not received my payments

(I cancelled Payplan and stopped paying some months ago).

 

 

I sent a CCA request to Optima Legal Services twice, on 29th April and 26th May this year,

once to their address shown on the interim charging order and the other to the address I found on Google.

 

This letter I've just got threatens further court proceedings and advise that a full charging order will be put against my house,

meaning that the debt has to be repaid in full when I come to sell my house.

 

They want a payment of £60 for the arrears which my wife wants to pay to get rid of them but is this the right thing to do?

I've not had any responses to my letters so not sure if I should reply to theirs?

 

Jaz

IMG_20171014_0002.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too late for a CCA request. The debt issue was decided by the court and a charging order was obtained. The CCA is now irrelevant.

 

If you don't pay the £20 per month it says was agreed, they could in theory take it further if they wanted, as they have a charge against your house.

 

Did the court tell you to pay £20 a month ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues Forum.

 

Jasmineuk, I've unapproved your Attachment, could you please remove all identifiers including Reference numbers.

 

Thanks.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too late for a CCA request. The debt issue was decided by the court and a charging order was obtained. The CCA is now irrelevant.

 

If you don't pay the £20 per month it says was agreed, they could in theory take it further if they wanted, as they have a charge against your house.

 

Did the court tell you to pay £20 a month ?

 

No, Payplan decided how much all my creditors got and I wasn't consulted on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are not paying what was agreed, the debt owner with the interim charging order can apply for a final charging order and then if necessary ask a court to consider an order to sell your house to pay the debt. Not saying this would happen, but given the debt amount, you might decide that you don't want to take the risk, when £20 a month is keeping them happy. Remember that if there is further court actions, they will add on costs and you will regret not having maintained payments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...