Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BES Utilities


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1225 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Have been a customer with BES since September, now thats not a long time ago really so you'd think not a lot could have gone wrong ...right? Wrong! Biggest scam company I have ever seen. If I ran my business they way this one is run, I'd have 0 customers!

 

Usual story, broker calls out of the blue (Who works on behalf of BES) when we opened up our offices in September.....Lo and Behold we get signed up with BES!

Since that day, my life has been nothing but stress!

 

Quite happily paid them £132.50 per month, thought that was quite reasonable..

.. Then the big one lands...£908 because of a meter reading I submitted as an opening read...

 

they estimated the bill from that and didn't even bother to get the closing read from the other energy supplier (BG Lite)

- so they way under estimated the reading to bring mine as excessively high usage and thus landing the big bill

- this is STILL under dispute I might add. Now I know times are difficult at the moment but this is taking the pee.

 

I cancelled my direct debit as you do as I could not afford for £900+ to go out of my account

I got charged out of contracts tariff for one month and a higher standing charge (non of this reflected in my online portal by the way, as in, there is no bill for this). Not that i can find. So for that month, i am owing £199. 

 

To my surprise I get a letter from Opus, or rather my sub tenant does for a charge of £250 for her gas.

She's with British Gas so this sounds iffy,

 

upon inspection and a phone call to Opus (The previous supplier) they tell me they have been running the account and that they have had an account on the meter since we moved in, and BES have been billing me for the wrong meter,

they are billing me for my tenants meter, which...is disconnected in the building.

 

I thought Ill give BES a call and see what they say and they say that I told them in September that my tenants meter was the one that I was using, right fair enough I may have told them that in the midst of confusing times and moving into the building I may have gotten them mixed up. However since then, BES have emailed me asking for photo confirmation of the Meter that 'I' use with a clear serial number. Done, October 21st that was sent.

 

they are only now after me calling them putting things in motion to bill the correct meter - so why was this not flagged in October when they emailed for confirmation?  I asked this on the phone with a manager to which they said well its your fault for confirming the wrong meter over the phone in September.... but you've had confirmation via you metering department since then??

 

I am not quite sure what they are doing and the £900 odd pound bill is still in 'dispute' - which they say I must pay by the way, numerous calls a day to the point I said I was going to sue for Harassment. 

 

I feel a bit 'conned' really, they certainly are not the cheapest in my area which the broker (Who called me out of the blue, and works on behalf of BES) purported. 

 

With the amount in dispute, and the £199 I owe them for when I cancelled my direct debit, plus this months bill at £508 - I am on the brink of not being able to pay my rent on my building.

 

Did I mention they banged me into a 36 month contract and there is a £3,500 fee to exit that contract?

Oh yeah I owe Opus £250 as well due to me thinking, stupidly that BES where billing me for that meter. Which I only found out about on Friday and we have threatening letters today of disconnection,

 

I have spoken to them and they have put the account on hold until they hear from BES......which I doubt they will.

BES still have not spoken to previous electric company regarding a closing reading, still estimated which means I still owe £824 pound of that 'estimated opening bill'. I paid £100 pound of that bill as a gesture of good will on my part to reassure BES that once they had sorted the issues I would paid what I owe if I owed it, and to stop the 7 calls a day harassment calls. 

 

Jokers.

I'd so dearly love to take legal action. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, it will help us a great deal if you would space your story properly and also punctuate it properly. In the middle of the large block it gets rather garbled and it's really quite difficult to work out what you are saying. This will tend to put people off helping you. Also on a smaller screen a solid block of text is very difficult to read.

I'm still trying to understand exactly what's happened here and it would be helpful if you would repost your story using a bullet pointed chronology without too much narrative and too much commentary please.

It's a shame that you respond to a cold call like this. Particularly from companies like BES. You clearly didn't do any research before you decided to throw your lot in with them – big fail. I suggest that you start looking around the Internet and you'll understand what a mistake you made.

However we can help you – but we'd like to understand the story please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, my autism gets the better of me sometimes.

 

I shall ask my wife to help me re-write my post.

 

yep, it was certainly a mistake to take the cold call and accept with BES, but, I do have a business to run and thought I was saving some time! Big mistake.

 

re-written post coming soon.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

Yes if you could put it up in a bullet pointed chronology then it will be easy to understand.

The objective is to understand the contract and the BES failings so that we can challenge the contract and say that they have breached it sufficiently for you to treat it as terminated.

Of course we may not be able to do this – but let's have a look

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have made post one somewhat clearer for you

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, dx100uk said:

i have made post one somewhat clearer for you

 

dx

 

You're all heart 😍

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • So you received a cold call from a broker.
  • You have now learned that the broker works for BES. – Did he present himself as an independent? Did he say that he would find you the best service, giving the impression that he was going to look through a range of suppliers?
  • They failed to take a closing reading from the previous supplier
  • this meant that your new bill was fairly open ended because they assumed a closing reading – is this correct?
  • So you received a very large bill that based on an estimated closing reading and also an estimated forecast reading and you are disputing this bill.
  • Because of this you cancelled the direct debit because you are worried about the amount of money leaving your account.
  • BES then decided that you had left your contract and they charge you a higher rate and a higher standing charge.
     

 

Now I don't understand how Opus comes into it. Were they your previous supplier? Because you referred to BG Lite as your previous supplier.
I don't understand this:
 

Quote

- so they way under estimated the reading to bring mine as excessively high usage and thus landing the big bill

 

You then discover that BES are actually charging you based on your ex tenants meter which in fact is disconnected so that it is not producing any readings at all???
You then started dealing directly with BES on the telephone to try and resolve the problem – but I expect that you haven't recorded your call so you have no evidence of what was said (read our customer services guide – and Pay Attention to It!)
Now I've lost the thread completely – I don't understand how you suddenly only owe them £199.

And I think it would be helpful now if you went over it and explained it more carefully – less narrative and in a bullet pointed chronology.

 

However my immediate advice is to stop dealing with BES on the telephone or at all until we understand the situation.

At the very least, the fact that BES charging you on the wrong meter and also that they failed to take proper readings at the beginning of the contract – and all of that within a very short space of three months – which represents the entire contract. So far, suggest to me that they have fundamentally breached their contract and that this will give you a basis for saying that they have terminated the contract by their breach.

Of course they won't come quietly on this and you will have to litigate that we will help you if you want.

However, I'd really like to understand the whole story first.

Read our customer services guide and implement the advice there in future.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, what is the position for changing suppliers with a business energy contract?

Can they block you until your bills are fully satisfied? Or do you have the right to change your supplier regardless as in a consumer contract?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that contractually you aren't allowed to leave but can they actually block you in some way?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I am reading on the Google Reviews page, even though they quote you a figure to get out of the contract, if you go to another supplier BES will stop the new supplier taking over the meters - how they do it I do not know.

But that is what I am seeing in reviews/comments...and there is a lot of them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Summary????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...