Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."    
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
    • We both sent our completed N181 form to the court and claimants solicitors. We haven't received anything from the solicitors yet but perhaps we will today. How are directions agreed ? Does the claimant file proposed directions with their Directions Questionnaire ? I will update once anything is received from the solicitors.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest/Resolvecall - Old LLoyds Loan - Possible SB'd


scratconsumer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 487 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Over the past few weeks, I have had the wonderful people from “Resolvecrawl” sorry I mean “Resolvecall” write to me over a very old credit card debt from 2004 and I am fully aware is long Statue Barred Certainly, no payment or any acknowledgment has been made since 2004! 

 

one of those lovely computer-generated letters from them stated that a representative of theirs would visit my property to discuss the debt if I did not contact them within 14 days.  I waited for the visit and unfortunately I was not at home when a hand delivered card was put through my letter box asking me to contact them.  I was rather annoyed that I was not home at the time to confront the representative!   

 

I am certainty not surprised either that they sent a representative of theirs during this pandemic!!  We all aware of how scrupulous and vindictive these DSA’s are, pandemic or no pandemic!  The world could have a week to exist and they would still try it on!  going off track, what would be the best course of action be? 

 

The original lender, buyer of the debt and any DCA’s had the chance of their day in court and if they choose to sleep on their legal rights for 6 years then this is their fault!  So, should I just sit on it and do nothing with Resolvecall?  Or Contact them and inform them of my rights and that this debt is Statue Barred?   

 

Any advice would be appreciated. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For an easier life – and also to avoid the risk of some kind of backdoor ccj you might be best off writing to them and telling them you dispute any debt but that in any event it would be  statute barred and that under the CONC rules, they are now prohibited from taking any further action on this and that you will make a complaint if you hear from them again

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I was concern about some kind of backdoor CCJ! 

Obviously I would defend any CCJ if this happened! 

I shall write to them explaining the situation in this case. 

What is the best way too contact these kind of companies theses days? 

Is via the standard recorded mail or will an email be sufficient enough? 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In your opening post you seem to be quite strident – in a subsequent post you say that you are going to explain the situation. I think you should simply lay it on the line.

Send them an email and also a recorded delivery letter.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

BankFodder,

any communication with them will be simply laid on the line in no uncertain terms! 

Explaining the situation simply meant I would tell them like it is, for which they know anyway! 

I shall email and send a recorded letter. 

Thank you so much for your advice BankFooder your a legend! :)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore snotscrawl..sorry resolvecall.

send THEIR STATED CLIENT..

 

our SB letter from the debt collection section of our library.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hello to you wonderful people at this brilliant forum! 

would like to pick your brains if you had had experience with any scruples tactics of the parasitic debt collector Capquest!!!  

In a past life I was silly with money and got into a lot of debt! 

 

I behave in a much different manner these days and all my past debts are very old and long Statute Barred

But as everyone at this forum has experienced old debts rear their ugly heads at times!

 

For years I have ignored the letters that come through the letterbox every now and then but this year I decided if any appear I will send Statue Barred letters, something I should have done long ago.

 

This past month I have had this company contact me regarding one of my very old debts (A Lloyds Loan) from 2005.  It’s all the usual letters quoting “Please get in contact so we can discuss the matter and we can reach some arrangement or pay the balance if full! Etc!” 

 

The debt itself was defaulted in January 2006 and it was defaulted again in December 2006 but whatever company purchased it. 

I fully understand a default cannot be issued twice but that is a different issue. 

no payment or acknowledgement has been made by me since October 2005 so the debt is long Statute Barred!!

 

I am fully aware of how some debt collectors behave with their tactics but recently I have experienced a new tactic (new to me anyway) from Capquest.  This company has for the past month been sending a letter a week and about 3 text and phone calls a week!  All text and phone calls ignored of course.  

 

But i received a text yesterday quoting “Hello, you have a letter waiting for you, please click the link to view it”.  This takes you to Capquest’s website and asks you to confirm your details before you can view the letter.  Naturally I won't be doing this!  What I would like to know is this some sort of backdoor CCJ trick by Capquest?

 

Could be a possible “ Letter of claim” and yet Capquest hopes I don’t respond or defend it by ignoring this latest text? 

Has anyone received this kind of text before?

 

I am under the assumption that all Letters Of Claims or CCJ’s must be still sent via post? 

the Statute Barred letter was sent to the company today.

 

Thank you in advance for any advice or experience from Capquest!!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Old LLoyds Loan - Possible Backdoor CCJ Capquest Tactics!?

had to remove you text as it obv shows ref numbers

we dont need it anyway

yes you've done right

 

send 'em the SB letter.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Capquest/Resolvecall - Old LLoyds Loan - Possible SB'd
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...