Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Honeybee Yes that's the one - many thanks. I did try and update it late last night but it said I had to contact site owners so I gave up and went to bed! In the end after no contact/updates from the solicitors the sale went through very quickly so I presume that didn't give the council sufficient time to swing into action.   Thanks
    • I tried to post an update on an earlier thread without success. Long story short. The house sale has taken place [title deeds had a charge against property] Restriction said 'No disposition of the registered estate is to be completed by registration without a certificate signed by the applicant or his conveyancer that written notice of the disposition was given to [name of council]. Exchange and completion within a couple of days. I've not heard anything from either solicitors involved on this point nor the council so not sure of the purpose / effectiveness of the charge as it doesn't seem to have held up the sale. Perhaps I'll get a bill next month?? Has anyone had a similar experience?  
    • Hi Hammy1962,    You make a fair point.  Yes, I made a mistake. I fully accept that.    As noted, this was an honest mistake - the DD was coming out of a joint account and I (mistakenly) assumed this was set up by my wife.    What concerns me - and I want to flag to others - is that when I was sold this policy it was not made clear that there is no obligation for D&G to get approval to continue this each year, no need for me to approve any increase to the premium they deduct (which has tripled over the period) or for them to change the policy. I was in effect (with one phone call) writing them a blank cheque when I agreed to this. If I had been clear on that I would have not taken on the policy.    From a business perspective, if one of my customers had presented me with these facts I would have handled it differently too.    Cheers!           
    • So the latest is I have agreed first thing  Monday morning with CCP to make payment by 22nd February. Just received a telephone call from Chartsbridge to make arrangements to collect my vehicle as they have just been instructed by CCP!!!
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

John Lewis Barring letter - please help!


Recommended Posts

Hello,

I’m really hoping someone can point me in the right direction, I’ve not slept and feel sick with worry regarding an email I received from John Lewis on Friday.

 

I have been a customer with them for over 15 years but they emailed me Friday advising me the amount of online returns and items gone astray is not sustainable and the business relationship must come to an end. They have sent me a barring letter stating I cannot shop online with them anymore or go the shop!

 

a few weeks ago they sent me a goodwill gesture of £10 for all the issues I’ve had with items I returned but were never scanned in, prior to this I was so fed up of having to chase the refunds team, their response was “what happens is the team work shifts so they sometimes scan one item from the box and forget about the rest”. This is a common issue apparently.  I was told this several times by customer services yet they are making out I didn’t return them, surely they would have cameras to verify this? Their words were disproportionate and unsustainable.

 

they have also shared the barring letter across the business.

 

I am shaking with upset and worry. Can anyone advise what to do? I just want to draw a line under this and move on. I have spent thousands of pounds over the year with them but now feel they are saying I am dishonest.

 

do I just assume from their email that’s it? I will not hear anything else and to keep away from the store?

 

after all these years I am devasted. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to John Lewis Barring letter - please help!

so they appears to be they are sort of accusing you of returning goods that you might not have been paid for?

 

no they can't harm you further and yes you simply forget about it if you wish

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I can gather,

they are saying I am returning the items (too many) but when I am saying items haven’t been scanned in they are saying it’s not enclosed in the parcel! They are saying I’ve kept them

 

- have had issues before but 3/4 occasions they have given me a goodwill gesture,

I have asked them previously to look at cameras on the refunds team but they just refunded me as though it wasn’t issue but now I look like the dishonest person. 

 

If it wasn’t for Covid I would have returned them to the shop so I know it’s all properly refunded.

They also said too many goods lost in transit,

 

last week there was an item missing from the parcel, turns out there was a separate parcel with this item in!

I emailed them to say it had arrived.

 

I can’t shop with them or Waitrose anymore both online or in the shop.

 

I feel sick to the core as I spend so much money with them and feel they haven’t looked at 15 years of custom.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes so its them accusing you of dishonesty when there is none.

 

it wont be an address bar so simply use a differing name if you want to shop online

as for the stores

they haven't a clue what you look like so simply pay by cash for a while.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, In the letter it says any email address associated with your home address we will not accept orders and if I am in a shop I will be asked to leave! How will they know what I look like? My local Waitrose store know me so it’s very embarrassing and upsetting. I feel wrongly done by and don’t know where to turn. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant tell where an email is from.

they don't know what you look like.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help, have you come across these cases before, being banned online? I am getting myself into a terrible state as I read on one thread about civil action being taken, I haven’t been prosecuted and I feel wrongly blamed so would they still try to recover monies? The email states not to attempt to order online/in shop and attached the barring letter to the business. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing anyone can do 

stop reading scary stories!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! Although Citizens Advice say not to ignore letters from RPL?

Do you think John Lewis would contact RPL to try and obtain monies?

 

How do RPL get your details is what I need to understand?

I haven’t been prosecuted and have done nothing wrong.

 

Also does a barring letter automatically mean life ban?

 

Sorry, just worrying myself to death when they were the ones in the wrong. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

As we say here, CAB are well-meaning but I'm afraid they have misunderstood that RLP are a sort of parallel unofficial legal system that can't do anything to you.

 

RLP get people's details who are stopped by security personnel in a shop. We have loads of threads about them and I don't remember anyone paying money to RLP.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the life ban simply use differing details

they'll not have a system to check every order online.

 

i'd also not bother about the stores detecting you.

again they have no clue what you look like.

 

stop panicking about nothing.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah thanks both, I’ve not eaten properly since I got the letter by email last Friday!

 

So John Lewis wouldn’t contact RPL or any other recovery company?

I feel angry that they have put me through this.

 

On the letter it just says barred and if I am in the store I will be asked to leave, not that I have any intentions of spending monies with them after I’ve been treated.

 

I thought they would have slick face recognition in the sores. 

If they were going to take action would t they have said so in their letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Ava321 said:

Ah thanks both, I’ve not eaten properly since I got the letter by email last Friday!

 

So John Lewis wouldn’t contact RPL or any other recovery company? - doesn't matter if they do .

I feel angry that they have put me through this.

 

On the letter it just says barred and if I am in the store I will be asked to leave, not that I have any intentions of spending monies with them after I’ve been treated.

 

I thought they would have slick face recognition in the sores. 

If they were going to take action would t they have said so in their letter?

 

how do they know what you look like...:noidea:

and no they don't use face recog software...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shop every weekend at the local Waitrose so they would know, I will just avoid.

 

I guess my major concern are John Lewis appointing a debt recovery firm like RPL, sorry what do you mean it dies to matter if they do?

 

I thought it was only people caught shoplifting!

But if John Lewis try and recover costs how would this work?

I feel so sick with worry 

 

Sorry I meant, what do you mean it doesn’t matter if they do contact RPL, wouldn’t they have said they were going to this in their letter? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking of RIP! It’s John Lewis online that’s told me I can’t shop with them but because they own Waitrose it applies to them too. Surely they would tell me if they were taking action not just a letter to say you are not welcome???

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Ava321 said:

I shop every weekend at the local Waitrose so they would know, I will just avoid. - dont need too!!

 

I guess my major concern are John Lewis appointing a debt recovery firm like RPL, sorry what do you mean it dies to matter if they do? - RLP are not debt collector and even if they were a debt collector is NOT A BAILIFF ON ANY DEBT and have ZERO legal powers on any debt no matter what type it is...

 

I thought it was only people caught shoplifting!

But if John Lewis try and recover costs how would this work? - they won't and can't

I feel so sick with worry 

 

Sorry I meant, what do you mean it doesn’t matter if they do contact RPL, wouldn’t they have said they were going to this in their letter? 

you ignore RLP

just go enjoy your life forget it ever happened

they have...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...