Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot and tesco Credit Card debt - dropping SB card But adding 'new' card in December.


SWLABR9
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1230 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got advised a few days ago by Clearscore that Cabot were removing a credit card debt from my record and that would show up in my next report, 20th December. Clearscore know this, they tell me, as it's already on my Equifax report.

 

I'm aware it becomes SB on the 14th  December so I assumed Cabot had decided to cave on that one, it's from 2002 or back then.

We've been in communication about it years ago, I three-lettered them etc and it's obvious they have nothing they can go to court with so it makes sense for them just to drop it. 

 

Now though I receive info from Clearscore Cabot are adding a new credit card to my report.

I don't have any new card to add so they're clearly trying to resurrect my old card somehow, to give the alleged debt life yea even after being SB. 

 

Does the team have any idea of what's going on and what I should do about it please?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I three-lettered them etc

 

:???: ......Speak to Clearscore and inform them.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks AO.

Should I bother sending the standard SB letter to Cabot?

 

I had intended to till just recently but they obviously are already aware of it anyway.

I'd do this after the due date has passed and I don't think I can inform Clearscore anyway till I actually receive my next report which will be on the 20th so, again, after the SB date has passed. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course you can speak to  Clearscore now before its added...and ask why are they adding a new card/debt when you have not entered into any new agreements......its a simple question and subject to their response you can then inform them that its already been reported and will fall away on the 14th Dec due to its 6th anniversary.

 

Inform them that a default marker can only show n your file for 6 years as per the ICO guidelines....it cant be removed then re added.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

three letter process

i hope you don't mean the FmOtL twaddle ?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should know better...

 

how are you gauging the SB date?

what is the debt type and the OC?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a CC, Tesco.

 

I three lettered Cabot, they sent the usual threatograms and that all died away...

I raised a dispute via Clearscore and Cabot sent me loads of crap from which, however, I was able to determine the SB date. And now here we are.

 

I have been trying to raise a dispute through Clearscore this morning and find I can't, their dispute procedure leads me to the Equifax complaint form which either suggests I raise the complaint first with the lender or sends me round in circles. So I can't get them to do it. That might change when it's actually on my report, I suppose...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Cabot and tesco Credit Card debt - dropping SB card But adding 'new' card in December.

still doesn't ans my question?

 

how are you deciding its statute barred?

record of payments

or 

registered defaulted dated date?

 

thats why the 3 letter FmOtL twaddle is so useless

all it does is show whomever you send it too you haven't a clue what you are going on about

so likewise they send the kitchen sink back.

 

was this a tesco bank issued card or one of the very old RSB tesco branded cards?

when does it originate from?
 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the kitchen sink back they duly did but it didn't establish anything other than they had no basis for taking me to court.

 

It's from 2002, I gleaned from the details Cabot sent me that the SB date would be 14th December and now Cabot's actions would appear to confirm this.

 

I can't remember now whether this is derived from the last payment date or the registered default date.

I could go back through my acres of paperwork to check if you feel it's really necessary... but it does appear I'm right and now Cabot are just trying it on to be awkward. 

 

 Maybe they think they can sell it in turn. 

 I've never had a Tesco bank account so I assume this is an old RBS badged account, however, I recall getting Tesco letterheads in correspondence when I first disputed it. I'm filling in the Equifax form in the interim here, finally managed to get past their roadblocks.  

 

OK, I'm saying this:

"An account is being removed from my report (Cabot).

 

I imagine this is because it becomes statute barred on the 14th December.

I note that same account is marked as reappearing on my report.  

 

Cabot are already aware this will fall away on the 14th Dec due to its 6th anniversary.

I understand a default marker can only show in my file for 6 years as per the ICO guidelines...

.it can't be removed then re added, which is what we seem to be seeing here."

 

Sound ok?

If Cabot want to dispute it then I suppose I will have to go back through my reams of paperwork to justify it but I reckon this'll do it. We hope :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

its the defaulted date thats the important bit

if the defaulted date has reached 6yrs the card should not be showing anywhere

 

you seem to be getting tied up on things that don't really matter, thats the pifalls of reading FmOtL crap sites.

 

the statute barred date due to the age of this account is totally immaterial to if it should ever be showing or not.

its the registered defaulted date which maybe the date the OC sold the debt or before if you had defaulted earlier.

 

eitherway once the defaulted date reaches 6yrs, the whole account gets removed and cannot return regardless to any payment follow that date.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

off it's gone and we'll wait to see what comes of it.

 

I managed earlier to see off a CC claim by Capital/Lowells, I just bundled together bits and pieces from here I thought were relevant in a series of letters to them and they folded, nulled it.

 

I tried the Three Letters this time to see how it went.

So far, well, it's ok insofar as not being sued goes but I don't want this on my report for ever :-) 

Thanks for your help peeps :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

images hidden

pdf only!

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...