Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statutory Periodic Tenancy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5571 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have decided to move out of our rented accomodation. Currently, we are on a Statutory Periodic Tenancy (given that we have lived in the property for 2 years, well past the fixed term period).

 

I understand that the minimum notice that a landlord must give is 2 months to ask the tenants to quit the property. What is the minimum notice that we, as tenants, must give to quit the property? I can find no mention that tenants are also required to give 2 months notice, however, I have found information that we only have to give one month's notice (to the end of the next rental period).

 

In our contract, it states:

 

"Where no notice has been received [to quit at the end of the fixed term,] this tenancy will revert to a statutory periodic tenancy requiring two months notice from either party to end the lease."

 

Are we bound to the two months notice indicated this statement? Or are we still bound to the statutory periodic tenancy rules (which I understand only requires 1 month's notice)?

 

I would read the contract as saying that: we will revert to a Statutory Periodic Tenancy and it is this that requires 2 months notice.

 

I would appreciate any help anyone can give!!

 

Thanks,

 

Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

A stat tenancy is just that - bound by statute and not contract. Statute will overule contract law if this ever ended up in court.

 

A SPT can be determined (ended) by giving a months notice to end on the next rent due date. i.e if the contract date is 18th of the month, then you could serve notice now on your landlord and the tenancy would determine on 18th Jan. You could give notice at any point between now and 18th Dec and determine the tenancy on 18th Jan, but as from 19th December you wouldl then go on to 18th Feb.

 

Hope that makes it clear?

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is taken from the Shelter website:

Periodic tenancies

If your agreement is periodic (ie. rolling from week to week or month to month), you normally have to give at least four weeks' notice to end it, or a month if you have a monthly tenancy. The notice must be in writing and must end on a day when the rent is due, or the day before. Ask an adviser about the dates if you're in any doubt.

The only exceptions to this are:

  • if your landlord agrees to accept a shorter notice period (see above), or agrees that someone else can take your place (see below)
  • if you are an excluded occupier, in which case you only have to give whatever notice is specified in your agreement, or 'reasonable notice', which is usually the same as one rental period (ie. one week, if you pay the rent weekly), or
  • if you pay rent less often than monthly. If this is the case, you have to give notice equivalent to a rental period (ie 3 months, if you pay the rent quarterly)

Regards, Joan.

First letter to halifax sent rec del 26/4

Data Protection Act letter to capital one sent rec del 26/4

Halifax 1st offer dated 5/5

Capital One ack Data Protection Act request rec 6/5

Request for repayment to Capital One 2/8

LBA sent 22/8

Court proceedings issued 13/10

Settled in Full 9/11

Donation made 14/11

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

nope. AST becomes periodic if it "rolls" over from AST without formal renewal. it then continues on monthly basis (if the rent is paid monthly). the main practical difference is that the landlord doesn't have to have any special grounds whatsoever to seek possession and can issue a notice at any time. Notice should be for 2 mnths and expire a day before your rent is due.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all!

 

I would just like to add:

 

1.A periodic tenancy could also be an Assured Tenancy - these types of tenancies are not around as much these days - pre 1996 tenancies could have been possibly drafted as Assured Shorthold Agreements but in fact were Assured Agreements which give tenants security of tenure.

The Housing Act 1996 cleared up the confusion - i.e.unless specifically written that the tenancy is an Assured Tenancy it would automatically be considered to an Assured Shorthold Tenancy.

 

2.If the tenant has a periodic assured tenancy it would be much more difficult for the owner to evict as mentioned in point 1.

 

3.Also,regarding Assured Shorthold Agreements once the fixed term expires the owner can evict fairly easily but must follow the correct procedures i.e. 2 month notice and then followed by the proper possession papers etc.

 

I hope you find this information useful.

 

If you have any more questions,just ask.

 

Keep us posted.

 

All the best!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

"Statutory Periodic Tenancy agreement" is a contradiction in terms. If a tenancy is agreed it is not statutory. So long as the tenant is in occupation, a statutory tenancy arises when any type of agreed tenancy comes to an end.

 

Quite apart from all this, a tenant cannot be made to pay the costs of a tenancy unless he agrees to pay them. See the Cost of Lease Act 1958 - Results within legislation - Statute Law Database

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi,

 

Please can someone help me. I am really stuck with my tenancy and the agency are stitiching me up - I'm sure of it.

 

My Fixed Term Tenancy for 6 months rolled over. I got charged £100 for a renewal fee but I have received no renewal paperwork yet - its been over 2 months already.

 

I gave notice to quit, they put the pressure on and said I had to give 2 months notice. I found out recently I could have walked away on the tenancy end date - but they advised me incorrectly.

 

The tenancy officially ended on 9th December. They didnt accept my notice until 11th December 2007 by which time in the absence of any renewal paperwork it became a Statutory Periodic which I pay monthly rent on (9th of each month). The agency have said I cannot leave the flat until 8th March 2008.

 

I have been advised that I could have walked away on 11th Jan 08 which would be one months full notice. I have also been advised that as 11th Dec is past the payment due date for that month, I can leave my flat on 8th Feb. The agency are insisting I leave on 8th March as it says 2 months notice in my contract - but I keep finding references on the internet (and the above conversation) that I need to give only 4 weeks notice. The agency said the tenancy rolled over so the previous terms still apply so therefore it would be from 11th Dec to 8th March (to go from 9th Jan to 8th March).

 

Please can you advise me on this one. The agent is being so rude and difficult.

 

Many thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

A fixed term tenancy ends when it ends; any requirement to give notice can be ignored.

 

Any notice provisions in a tenancy agreement which purport to deal with notice after the fixed term comes to an end are a legal nonsense; the exception is if the agreement provides for the tenancy to continue as a periodic tenancy and the provisions relate to the periodic tenancy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Aequitas,

 

Thanks for your response.

 

As the agent put so much pressure on me and advised me incorrectly I was not able to walk away when my 6months fixed term tenancy ended. It therefore rolled over to a statutory periodic as they did not send any renewal paperwork - which they are now saying has to follow the same terms and conditions as the previous fixed term agreement.

 

I don't understand where you have said "the exception is if the agreement provides for the tenancy to continue as a periodic tenancy and the provisions relate to the periodic tenancy." My tenancy agreement rolled over, nothing has been signed still. Do I still have to give 2months notice or do I just give 4weeks?

 

I keep finding references that it should be 4weeks notice and the agent is incorrect by making me give 2 months notice (well in my case its is 1 day less than 3 months notice).

 

Can you please advise what is correct please?

 

Many thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 weeks is the minimum period for a notice to quit.

 

If you have a weekly tenancy the notice period is four weeks.

 

If you have a four-weekly tenancy the period is four weeks.

 

If you have a monthly tenancy the period is a calendar month.

 

If under the fixed term tenancy you paid rent weekly you have a weekly periodic tenancy; if you paid rent every four weeks, the tenancy is four-weekly; and if you paid monthly, it is monthly.

 

The notice must expire on either the first or last day of a rent period.

 

The first rent period started the day after the fixed term came to an end and the subsequent periods are calculated accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hello. We had a ten-year Assured Tenancy until January last year and since then, as I understand it, we have been on a SPT. I also understand that in this situation we are effectively guaranteed longevity of this accommodation unless we fall behind in our rent or are in non-compliance with one of the terms of the original agreement.

 

Is this correct, would you know?

 

I also wonder, in the current climate, what would happen if the landlord became bankrupt and was forced to sell the house.

 

Thanks

 

Bob

Link to post
Share on other sites

No thats not correct. Can you create a new thread, and in that explain the situation that resulted in your moving from an assured tenancy to a SPT?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Many thanks for the insightful discussions.

 

I've got a very related question, which I don't think is covered in the thread so far.

 

I hope it's ok to continue in this thread rather than create a new one.

 

 

So here's the scenario:

 

- currently on a periodic contract (after agreed renewal of initial shorthold tenancy agreement)

 

- rent is paid monthly; due date for rent is the 6th of each month

 

- gave notice on December 18th for moving out on January 23rd (i.e. gave more than a month's notice)

 

- December & January rents were paid on time on the 6th of each month (i.e. essentially the rent is paid until February 5th)

 

- the problem is we want to move out on January 23rd (as stated above, we gave more than a month's notice on Dec 18th)

 

 

The question:

 

Taking this into account...

 

If you have a monthly tenancy the period is a calendar month.

 

...would I be right to claim that the portion of the rent between January 23rd - February 5th should be returned to me with the deposit?

 

(assuming here that the property will not be rented to new tenants by January 23rd)

 

If you can also kindly include a reference to the legal basis used for your reply it would be very much appreciated.

 

 

In an email, I have the following note from the property agent:

 

Please note that on a periodic contract you need to give at least 1 months notice that must end on the day before the period of the contract starts.

Hence in your case the period of the contract ends on the 5th of each month, so notice needs to be give on or before the 5th of the preceding month.

 

I understand the agent's point, but it is my impression that this would apply if we were to move out on January 6th (i.e. we should have given notice 'on or before the 5th of the preceding month', i.e. on or before December 5th).

 

Many thanks!

Edited by Glass7
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...