Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/jan/19/ministers-set-to-halt-plans-for-daily-covid-tests-in-english-schools   Seems to indicate the the lateral flow tests for schools was intended to be used as an all clear, rather than as an extra trap. Recipe for disaster that approach.   A further nail in the deputy chief lie mongers' flagrant mis-assertions of suitability.
    • There must be, but what I've seen is patchwork/filtered/munged data   It also seems that a high % of the Israeli infections are apparently reported as the Johnson/Handcock/Kent variant  
    • I have previously posted about a dispute my parents have had with LL who has had little to do with the property they have rented for the last 35 years.   Fast forward to today, LL has applied for fair rent which was registered and the LL has finally brought the property to a safe standard following involvement from the local council.   We have received a new bombshell.. that the LL has applied for a possesion order under a notice of seeking possesion of a secure tenancy (NOSP).   Under grounds 3, 4 and 10.   I googled and found below:   Ground 3 –  Deterioration in the condition of the property The tenant, or anyone else living in the property, must have caused deterioration in the condition of the property or common parts. If damage is caused by a lodger or subtenant of the tenant (without the tenant's consent), possession will not be granted if the tenant has taken reasonable steps to evict that person. Ground 4 –  Deterioration in furniture provided The tenant, or anyone else living in the property, must have caused deterioration in the condition of furniture provided by the landlord in the property or common parts. Where damage is caused by a lodger or subtenant of the tenant (without the tenant's consent), possession will not be granted if the tenant has taken reasonable steps to evict that person. Ground 10 – Demolition or major works Where the landlord intends either to demolish or reconstruct or do works to the property and needs possession in order to do so. The landlord must prove that it intends carrying out works and such work cannot reasonably be carried out without obtaining possession.[2] If the tenant agrees to vacate the premises temporarily while the works are carried out then there may be no need for possession. The displaced tenant will normally be entitled to compensation.[3] See Problems during repairs for information on compensation for loss of home.   My question is, following the fair rent register and an agreement that parents were covered under the 1977 rent act we were under the impression this is a regulated tenancy, not a secure tenancy?? or is there no difference?   Its a private rent, not through housing association and the property has just been deemed as safe under by the council.   We have also never been approached by the LL to say they felt that my parents have caused any damage or deterioration in the condition of the property. If anything, over the years it has vastly been improved by my parents. We raised safety issue to the council following repeated attempts for LL to repair the dangerous electrics and blocked drains.   If there is no difference in the tenancy types, what should our next step be? any thoughts?   More info if needed in my original thread https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421879-major-repairs-to-letting-of-a-sitting-tenant/?tab=comments#comment-5064284          
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Recommended Posts

I have been issued 5 speeding tickets at the same location over 3 days doing between 34mph to 39 mph in a 30 mph zone.

Can I get them all heard at the same time in court to save time and court costs.   

 

I know it will take me over the 12 points but I have mitigating circumstances as I suffer with Septic Arthritis and I can't walk long distances and have to attend hospital appointments for treatment I live on my own so I don't have anyone to drive me or help me .

 

My age is 68 I only use my car for shopping, hospital appointments and visiting the cemetery. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I expect people will be along to advise during the weekend. I can't comment on motoring stuff unfortunately, including mitigating circumstances, but we have members who can. They should be along over the weekend.

 

Best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i wouldn't use that as an excuse as you would endanger yourself in possibly confessing you are not fit to drive a car if you are saying your condition is the route cause of why you habitually sped in the same area several times.

 

be very careful here 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes my N'T key is sticky.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 am not saying my Septic Arthritis is the reason for my speeding. 

My Septic Arthritis is why I need my driving licence to travel to the hospital and shopping. 

 

I need to know if I can get the 5 speeding tickets heard on the same court day to limit the cost and time,  I am pleading guilty to the charges of speeding

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, are you sure you have a ticket for doing 34mph? That would be most unusual as the guidelines issued by the National Police Chiefs’ Council suggest action is not taken below 35mph. All police forces in England & Wales usually comply with those guidelines. It doesn’t particularly matter. If you have five tickets you have five tickets. It’s just that I have heard a number of reports of drivers seeing action below 35mph but have never seen a substantiated case. So it’s only for my own interest.

 

The first of your offences should qualify for the offer of a speed awareness course (provided the offences were not in Scotland and you have not done one for an offence which occurred in the last three years). But you may not choose to take that (see below). For the next three you should be offered a fixed penalty (£100 and three points). After that it gets messy. With nine points you will not be offered a FP (or if you are you cannot accept it). Your matter will be dealt with in court and you will face a “totting up” ban of six months. In order to avoid a ban you will have to argue that “exceptional hardship” will follow for you or others if you are banned. Of course everybody can expect to suffer some hardship if they are disqualified. The clue is in the name – the hardship has to be exceptional. That is over and above that which most drivers might suffer.

 

From your brief description of your condition it seems you may have the making of a successful EH argument. It would certainly help your case if you could get some medical evidence of the difficulties you face if you are not able to drive. If you’re going to argue EH (and these are not “mitigating circumstances” – that is something different) you may find it beneficial to decline the offer of a course. If you’re going to face a ban for twelve points you might as well face a ban for fifteen and going to fifteen would leave you a course “in hand” in case of any future offences. If your EH argument is successful you will leave the court with 12 or 15 points; any further offence will see you face a totting up ban again and you cannot use an EH argument using the same reasons within three years.

 

First things first – you need to respond to the requests for drivers details that you have (failure to do so sees you commit a separate more serious offence). I would see what you are offered. The first decision will be whether to accept a course or not as I have explained above. Only when you have accepted three FPs need you worry about having any remaining charges heard together.

 

Let me know if I can help further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I know it will take me over the 12 points but I have mitigating circumstances as I suffer with Septic Arthritis and I can't walk long distances and have to attend hospital appointments for treatment I live on my own so I don't have anyone to drive me or help me .  I can get medical records and evidence from the hospital that I suffer with Septic Arthritis and I can show pictures from the hospital when I had my last attack.  

 

My age is 68 I only use my car for shopping, hospital appointments and visiting the cemetery. 

 

They originally sent me 6 speeding tickets but when I checked them 2 of the tickets were at the same time same speed and same date but 2 different notice numbers .  When I contacted the safety camera unit and explained this they immediately cancelled one of the tickets so that took it back to 5.  Should they have cancelled the 2 tickets as we do not know which one was the correct one.  They put a new camera up on the road with no white lines so I didn't see the camera as it was very high up and there were no white lines on the road but when I went back to check there were some small silver dots on the road. 

 

Many thanks for your helpful advice as its very much appreciated  

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you don't have mitigating circumstances. They are matters which lessen the seriousness of an offence or offences. You haven't mentioned anything that suggests that. As I explained, if you are banned you might successfully argue that you will suffer "exceptional hardship". That is where your medical evidence will be of benefit. But first things first - have you responded to all five requests for driver's details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have replied to all 5 cases. They have now sent me 3 single justice procedure notices and I am waiting for the other 2 to arrive. The form is asking if I’m pleading guilty or not and asking for my statement of means. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they haven't offered a speed awareness course either?  (Have you done one in the last three years or is this in Scotland?)

 

And is one of the notices for 34 in a 30?  As Man in the Middle says, that ought to be below the level at which they take action.

 

(And sorry - I don't want to appear preachy - but...  there don't have to be any warnings or signs or lines on the road to advise you of the presence of speed cameras.  If you get away with an exceptional hardship argument you will need to stick to speed limits in future - whether you know there are cameras there or not.  NB Don't know if this applies to you, but most 30 mph limits are restricted roads with a system of streetlighting and don't even need speed limit signs - you are assumed to know this from the Highway Code).

Edited by Manxman in exile
Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth contacting the issuing office to ask why you have not been offered fixed penalties for any of these as all of them would normally qualify. That aside, you need to wait for the remining SJPNs to arrive and write to court to ensure they are all heard at once. This is really important because if you do make a successful EH argument and a later offence raises its head you cannot make the same argument again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...