Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, not that I am a glutton for punishment, this case is progressing to allocation. Cahoot/Santander have filed their defence. No applications to strike out. Had a letter from the courts today saying it is awaiting allocation.
    • Just an idea, why not have a wind turbine and some solar panels installed and produce your own energy, even get paid to put some back into the national; grid!   I'm happy to pay the water companies for providing clean drinking water direct to my house, otherwise I'd have to go down to the river, collect some water, then cart it back home and then treat it in order for it to be safe to drink.   Same goes for my gas and electric, electrickery is a dark art, I'm not even sure how I'd begin to make that least of all contain it?   And I'm far too lazy to dig into the earths crust to extract my own gas, so I'm happy to fund someone else to have that headache and provide me those resources.
    • the company is parcelbroker.co.uk  some of the problems were caused by brexit over Christmas but there were so many problems it became a comedy of errors! I really just want my phone charges repaid. i contacted EE and they have agreed to repay £30. I think its reasonable for Parcel Broker to pay the other £50. it was never made clear when calling them that it was a premium rate number. They never rang me, I ALWAYS had to ring them..
    • I wouldn't be tipping them off about anything that could be one of a very narrow range of issues with things.
    • I am being harrangued for a debt I don't owe whilst in hardship by EDF, who was given this household's supply by OFGEM when it closed down several small companies in 2019. Unbelievably, this is happening during cold months and a full strict lockdown!   I consider that this is a crime on several counts: 1) fraud by nondisclosure, as per 2006 act: that free energy exists and that patents have been suppressed to help us use it, thus giving the illusion that energy can only be supplied by for profit companies (the same is true of water), when it is a naturally occurring, God-given free resource which has been harnessed and sold back to us, and it's hard to avoid or find alternatives 2) the energy industry is a form of modern slavery as per 2015 act, holding us in lifelong custom: something we need, can't easily find an alternative from or not use. This supplier took over without consent or knowledge or warning and will not relinquish me without paying them; but the amount grows as they continue our abusive relationship 3) as utility acts such as the 1989 and 1990 clash with inalienable natural Common Law and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 and various other laws, some to be listed anon, that the so-called powers given to energy companies to gain money and bully are not lawful 4) removal of energy takes our rights (as in the UDHR) to eat, wash, be warm, work, communicate, and have leisure and enjoyment. Particularly, it can cut those off who rely on the internet and battery operated phones, thus making them vulnerable, and causing a snowball effect 5) cutting off, or the fear and bullying around doing so and 'recovering debts', causes mental and physical suffering, as well as great inconvenience and loss. a) These are recoupable in monetary terms of the claimant (ie customer's) choosing b) this amounts to constructive demise or manslaughter  - including attempt and conspiracy to commit this serious crime (attempt and conspiracy apply for all the others below) 6) asking for money in a way which is upsetting, intimidating or distressing is another criminal offence under the Prevention From Harassment act of 1997 - and most debt demands fulfil this, and are not incidental, but designed to cause fear in the way they are worded, in the design of the 'red, urgent' envelopes, in the vagueness of who and where the collector is, offering a generic phone number; bluffing about their powers and a warrant; coming to the door with hand delivered envelopes to embarass in front of household members and neighbours; and the way they appear at your door to actually collect or tamper with supply 7) There is Aggravated Trespass under the criminal justice and public order act of 1994, where if you have given written notice that implied access to your property (I include remotely, in the case of smart meters), to enter the premises (including outside areas) without written permission and especially with ill-intent, is a further summary, ie imprisionable offence 😎 this is also exhortion and blackmail 9) it is an aggressive sales technique, no different from drugs barons and loan sharks 10) a prepayment meter is just another way of forcing debt repayment, and as the customer doesn't set the amount, if they do not have resources they are still left without power and heat 11) this is closely related to the data and surveillance and weaponised energy of 5G via smart meters, and so this is a) espionage b) mass experimentation under the Nuremburg code of 1948 c) biowarfare 12) it is also breaking and entering, if they force or pick locks 13) any physical abuse has other crimes - such as battery, grevious bodily harm, assault 14) lying or tricking to gain entry is also a crime 15) their involving your neighbours breaks confidentiality, such as asking about you, getting them to let them in. This is against their industry code and 16) during lockdowns and other restrictions related to covid, they break the coronavirus act 2020. Utility workers are only classed as keyworkers when they are keeping a supply running and safe. They are not permitted to work or travel to harass and cut off - this is especially reprehensible during an extended pandemic when so many are anxious have weakened immunity, and financial difficulties. When most of us are not meant to see loved ones, especially indoors 17) if the operatives are masked - this includes a locksmith or any enforcement with them - this heightens the offence as, despite covid guidance, it is done with criminal intent and knowingly a) makes them look sinister, thus adding to fear of the customer b) hides their identity and obfuscates justice 18) any persons involved, including administrators and the judge who created any warrant 19) to exaggerate one's legal powers is also an offence   Furthermore, utility companies send out - and sell out - debts and debt collectors who have no knowledge of the communications between the company and the customer; such as whether they are misbilled, or even the right person. I also believe that poor service, such as being ignored or bullied, means a rebate on the 'bill'.   The ombudsman have consistently exacerbated and failed to put right, and OFGEM's policies have added to this too.   We need to take the power back into our hands; to choose our energy source and provider; to harness free, safe energy.   I am putting EDF staff on notice for all these.   Has anyone else had any similar trouble for this, especially in the last year? I would like to know the extent of the problem   I am considering class action. An expression of interest in no way commits you, especially financially.      
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Recommended Posts

I have been issued 5 speeding tickets at the same location over 3 days doing between 34mph to 39 mph in a 30 mph zone.

Can I get them all heard at the same time in court to save time and court costs.   

 

I know it will take me over the 12 points but I have mitigating circumstances as I suffer with Septic Arthritis and I can't walk long distances and have to attend hospital appointments for treatment I live on my own so I don't have anyone to drive me or help me .

 

My age is 68 I only use my car for shopping, hospital appointments and visiting the cemetery. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I expect people will be along to advise during the weekend. I can't comment on motoring stuff unfortunately, including mitigating circumstances, but we have members who can. They should be along over the weekend.

 

Best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i wouldn't use that as an excuse as you would endanger yourself in possibly confessing you are not fit to drive a car if you are saying your condition is the route cause of why you habitually sped in the same area several times.

 

be very careful here 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes my N'T key is sticky.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 am not saying my Septic Arthritis is the reason for my speeding. 

My Septic Arthritis is why I need my driving licence to travel to the hospital and shopping. 

 

I need to know if I can get the 5 speeding tickets heard on the same court day to limit the cost and time,  I am pleading guilty to the charges of speeding

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, are you sure you have a ticket for doing 34mph? That would be most unusual as the guidelines issued by the National Police Chiefs’ Council suggest action is not taken below 35mph. All police forces in England & Wales usually comply with those guidelines. It doesn’t particularly matter. If you have five tickets you have five tickets. It’s just that I have heard a number of reports of drivers seeing action below 35mph but have never seen a substantiated case. So it’s only for my own interest.

 

The first of your offences should qualify for the offer of a speed awareness course (provided the offences were not in Scotland and you have not done one for an offence which occurred in the last three years). But you may not choose to take that (see below). For the next three you should be offered a fixed penalty (£100 and three points). After that it gets messy. With nine points you will not be offered a FP (or if you are you cannot accept it). Your matter will be dealt with in court and you will face a “totting up” ban of six months. In order to avoid a ban you will have to argue that “exceptional hardship” will follow for you or others if you are banned. Of course everybody can expect to suffer some hardship if they are disqualified. The clue is in the name – the hardship has to be exceptional. That is over and above that which most drivers might suffer.

 

From your brief description of your condition it seems you may have the making of a successful EH argument. It would certainly help your case if you could get some medical evidence of the difficulties you face if you are not able to drive. If you’re going to argue EH (and these are not “mitigating circumstances” – that is something different) you may find it beneficial to decline the offer of a course. If you’re going to face a ban for twelve points you might as well face a ban for fifteen and going to fifteen would leave you a course “in hand” in case of any future offences. If your EH argument is successful you will leave the court with 12 or 15 points; any further offence will see you face a totting up ban again and you cannot use an EH argument using the same reasons within three years.

 

First things first – you need to respond to the requests for drivers details that you have (failure to do so sees you commit a separate more serious offence). I would see what you are offered. The first decision will be whether to accept a course or not as I have explained above. Only when you have accepted three FPs need you worry about having any remaining charges heard together.

 

Let me know if I can help further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I know it will take me over the 12 points but I have mitigating circumstances as I suffer with Septic Arthritis and I can't walk long distances and have to attend hospital appointments for treatment I live on my own so I don't have anyone to drive me or help me .  I can get medical records and evidence from the hospital that I suffer with Septic Arthritis and I can show pictures from the hospital when I had my last attack.  

 

My age is 68 I only use my car for shopping, hospital appointments and visiting the cemetery. 

 

They originally sent me 6 speeding tickets but when I checked them 2 of the tickets were at the same time same speed and same date but 2 different notice numbers .  When I contacted the safety camera unit and explained this they immediately cancelled one of the tickets so that took it back to 5.  Should they have cancelled the 2 tickets as we do not know which one was the correct one.  They put a new camera up on the road with no white lines so I didn't see the camera as it was very high up and there were no white lines on the road but when I went back to check there were some small silver dots on the road. 

 

Many thanks for your helpful advice as its very much appreciated  

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you don't have mitigating circumstances. They are matters which lessen the seriousness of an offence or offences. You haven't mentioned anything that suggests that. As I explained, if you are banned you might successfully argue that you will suffer "exceptional hardship". That is where your medical evidence will be of benefit. But first things first - have you responded to all five requests for driver's details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have replied to all 5 cases. They have now sent me 3 single justice procedure notices and I am waiting for the other 2 to arrive. The form is asking if I’m pleading guilty or not and asking for my statement of means. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they haven't offered a speed awareness course either?  (Have you done one in the last three years or is this in Scotland?)

 

And is one of the notices for 34 in a 30?  As Man in the Middle says, that ought to be below the level at which they take action.

 

(And sorry - I don't want to appear preachy - but...  there don't have to be any warnings or signs or lines on the road to advise you of the presence of speed cameras.  If you get away with an exceptional hardship argument you will need to stick to speed limits in future - whether you know there are cameras there or not.  NB Don't know if this applies to you, but most 30 mph limits are restricted roads with a system of streetlighting and don't even need speed limit signs - you are assumed to know this from the Highway Code).

Edited by Manxman in exile
Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth contacting the issuing office to ask why you have not been offered fixed penalties for any of these as all of them would normally qualify. That aside, you need to wait for the remining SJPNs to arrive and write to court to ensure they are all heard at once. This is really important because if you do make a successful EH argument and a later offence raises its head you cannot make the same argument again.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Please take note: I got 2 tickets for 32  miles in a 30 zone on different days.  The police said its their policy to ticket anything over 30!!  
I had to pay £100 for one and do the course as well.  Even as a disabled driver there was no give on the tickets.

Please stop saying that it has to be 35+ it really does not.
West Midlands police in Nuneaton so definitely dont go 1 mile over in that area.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...