Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you both. My defence was as vague as their Claim. 1. I am the defendant in this claim and litigant in person. All allegations made by the claimant are denied. 2. The defendant does not recognise the alleged agreement xxxxxxxxxxx as mentioned in the particulars of claim therefore it is denied that any such agreement exists. 3. The defendant has requested copies of the alleged agreement under Data Subject Access Request, Consumer Credit act 1974 s.77/8 and Civil Procedure Rules 31.4 but to date the claimant has failed to provide a copy of this document. 4.The defendant has also requested copies of the default and termination notice for the alleged account xxxxxxxxx as required to legally enforce the alleged debt, but again the claimant has failed to provide either. 5. In addition the defendant has requested copies of statements for the alleged account xxxxxxx showing the amount of monies allegedly owed to the claimant. To Date these have not been provided. 6. The defendants view is that this claim is vexatious and an abuse of process as the claimant has failed to provide any documentation to support their claim and respectfully requests that the said claim be struck out.   As an aside, I noticed that the 'statement' they did provide had a different figure on it to what they are claiming, so I will hopefully be able to flesh out quite a bit in my skeleton argument.   Spam 
    • 80% refund sounds like a very good deal as they are entitled by law to deduct an amount from the refund to reflect the use you have had of the item over the 12 months it has been working.   So you could argue that a deduction of 20% for one year indicates that they expect it to last for at least five years, and probably longer.
    • Hi WoodDD.. Neither Case was cited in the VSC WS... however, MR D form VCS threw in VCS v Ward & Idle for the Judge to consider during the hearing. The Judge did not have time to review this. I believe he may have had a quick scan but decided it wasn't relevant at the time.. By not relevant, he didn't elaborate if it was not admissible or anything else..   Hope this helps..   Regards Tom     
    • Can I  ask what you mean by "... they recommended a firm... "?   I ask because I'm a bit surprised that Social Services are even allowed to do that.  (I may be mistaken and that this is common practice, but it seems a bit odd to me).   If they did do so and the work has turned out to be sub-standard and unsatisfactory, I would have no hesitation in making a formal complaint to the council and also to my (or your friend's) local councillor(s).  You acted on the council's recommendation and you should have a reasonable expectation that the firm recommended should be reliable and professional.  I would also insist that trading standards be asked to investigate this firm.  (Where I live our local county council trading standards department runs an approved trader database).   A complaint to the council might not directly assist you but it might help to prevent others being taken in by this firm.
    • Hello Susan, welcome to CAG.   Hopefully Paul Walton will see this message and reply to you, but it would also be a good idea to start a new thread of your own so we can advise on anything else connected with your refund.   Best, HB
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Online order wrongly sent two items instead of one - what should I do?


Recommended Posts

I ordered a new computer last week online and it was faulty so had it replaced yesterday. This was also faulty so I had another replacement sent out today!

 

While I was negotiation either a refund or a replacement they asked me if I wanted to order a different one, so I had a look around the website but couldn't decide in the time I had so I just went for another one the same.

 

The delivery guy just turned up to take away the old one with a replacement AND the alternative one I was looking at!

 

So I took both anyway, because I'm still actually in two minds as to whether I want to stick with the original computer or go with the alternative, which might be more reliable because it's a more established company.

 

They didn't ask me for any credit card details so as far as I am aware so far they won't have charged me for the extra computer. Would they need to take my details again or would it go through automatically?

 

Am I within my rights to keep both if they've made a mistake and don't charge me?

 

I don't want to come across as dishonest, but well:

 

1. I've spent the past week setting up two computers, trying to fix things only to end up having to go through it all again today and this has been a huge waste of my time and a lot of stress (time is money)

2. I decided to just take both primarilly because I saw the box for the alternative and it looked nice and I thought I could just take both anyway and then decide which one to open and keep (because I'm guessing if I have been charged both to my card and I open both then I've got no legs on so far as a return is concerned)

 

Anyone got any consumer advice on what legs I have to stand on and what I should or should not do at this point?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note you're not within your rights to keep it. I think we need to be realistic here.

Also, who are you dealing with? Did you buy it from?

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

AO

 

Seems reasonable. If no CC details were taken for the extra then that probably means they haven't billed me for the extra computer?

 

If they don't bill me and they don't notice am I committing an offense if I don't say anything?

 

On the plus side, it's a good thing the mistake happened because I decided to go for the alternative to the first one (which is made by an older company with a long history of producing quality and feels a whole lot more solid). I need something I can rely on not to crash while I'm in the middle of working.

 

I've got the other one still boxed and sealed so can see what happens.

Edited by whiteadder
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Well you certainly not your rights to keep any items accidentally delivered. Also, you can be sure that if they've got your credit card details then if they realise at some point the error then they are quite likely to put in a request for payment to your bank.

I suggest that you call them immediately and inform them of the error and tell them that they need to make arrangements to pick up the wrong the delivered goods. I would follow that up in an email if I you say you've got a paper trail.

At the same time, if you have pay by credit card then I would phone up the bank and give them an instruction not to pay anything further to this company – and follow that up in writing as well. Of course you should record your calls – read our customer services guide.

You say that you were interested in an alternative computer because it had a nice box. I'm not sure that this is a good way to buy computers.

In principle you would be entitled to claim storage and also compensation for the waste of your time in setting up these faulty computers. In practice, it might not be worthwhile. I can imagine that you might only be able to claim 50 quid or so and you would probably have to bring a court action in order to do that, with all the additional hassle that that entails and also the risk of losing so that you lose your court fees.

However, I do think that they should make an arrangement to collect the only delivered goods within seven days and I think you should set that down. If they then muck it up and take longer than 14 days then I think we have an interesting issue to deal with and you should let us know.

While the wrongly delivered items are in your possession, you actually have a duty to keep them safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. The alternative one was £50 more actually, so I'd be happy to accept no extra charge for the replacement to compensate me for all the hassle.

 

I said that on the phone when I was trying to decide but they didn't want to go for it.

If it has to go back and I have to pay an extra £50 then so be it, as long as I feel more happy with my purchase in the end is the main thing. Might be a blessing in disguise that the error was made.

 

The previous computer was slick as hell when it was running, but after so many BSODs and all the rest you just have to say no thanks, I'll try a different model please.

 

I'm really tired from spending late nights trying to get to the bottom of things, and fix issues so right now I think I can claim the right to have the weekend to set this new PC up and see how it performs before doing the right thing on Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well warn your bank not to pay any money

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really understand what you are asking just there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well whichever one you don't want you will have to return it.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

No they don't, as BF indicated they have to inform the company of the mistake and ensure the goods remain in the condition they were provided, it is the responsibility of the company to collect the goods not theirs to return unless this is pre-agreed and compensated for accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

by return it, i didn't mean at your cost, no.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...