Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Location not as described @emblefarms court claim issued **REFUNDED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not massively at this point – although the case would be started in the English courts.

No there aren't templates letters. I'm sure that you can't imagine that the circumstances of your case are so particular that we would have a template already for you simply to fill in the details and send off!

Spend a bit of time pulling down what you want to say and what you are proposing to offer or ask for – and then we'll have a look at it here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they do overlook the sea.

its there even in the background of their photos!

and theres a map on the site that clearly shows their position..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I think if you raise this issue in court and go for your expectation losses then this question of the locality and the description of the holiday site is going to come under very close scrutiny – and you need to be very sure that you will be able to argue your case in a convincing way.

This is another reason why you are probably right to settle for the easier option and to get your promised refund – as you now appear to accept

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well write a letter – not too much "in your face" in which you point out the discrepancies and also refer to his promise to refund you if you left and that you have the chat messages of this. Invite him to make the refund but suggest that if you have to go ahead and claim the refund then you will have to do raise the issues of the description of his site as well.

Then if you don't get refund within a few days, issue a letter of claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thebeehive said:

That sea is in the distance over a mile away as the crow flies, with fields and multiple roads in between.

 

You have made that point already. But that doesn't mean that the website is misleading.  "Overlooking" doesn't mean "right next to".  You made some incorrect assumptions - including not only about the location, it seems.  As a piece of consumer advice I'd suggest you research your holiday choices a bit more so your expectations are not disappointed.  In this day and age, there's really no excuse not to.  As Bankfodder says, the fact that you've can show in writing a commitment to a refund if you choose to leave seems to be the strongest point of your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually maybe a better and less conflictual approach could be to write to him, point out that he made the promise to refund you if you left did you did and so you think it would only be fair of him to make the refund. Don't mention the rest of the issues at this point.

If he doesn't reply within seven days or if he refuses, then maybe the thing to do is to write a further letter and point out that he's pushing you to County Court and that your claim will be for a much more serious amount including expenses and also bring up the issue of the description of the site.

I think a slow approach is probably the best here. If this guy loses his temper so easily in the way that you suggest, then he is clearly worried about losing Face instead of making rational decisions. Best thing to do is to try and help him save Face and to get your money.

If you back into a corner with all the other issues at an early stage then he might become more stubborn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a first attempt at a letter (is it ok to send by email?):

Quote

 

Saturday 21stNovember

 

Dear Mr and Mrs Douglas

 

We paid £409 to stay at your cabins from the 19thto the 22ndof October this year. We were unhappy with our stay and on the 20thof October Meg Douglas texted me to say that if we were unhappy that she would be happy to refund us for our stay. We then left on the 20thof October and have not received the refund. On the 22ndOctober Guy Douglas stated by telephone and email that you will not refund us despite promising to do so. 

 

We would prefer to have the refund as promised by Meg in her text messages to me, that I have on record. Should you continue to go back on Meg’s promise of a refund then we have no choice but to make a Small Claim in the County Court and will additionally raise the points of the confusion in the advertising on your website in addition to travel expenses and loss of income incurred for the days when we should have been on holiday. 

 

We look forward to resolving this matter swiftly. 

 

Regards

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can send it by email – and it's fine although personally I would have avoided raising the other issues at this early stage

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the following would be better? :

 

Quote


Subject: Refund claim

 

Dear Mr and Mrs Douglas

 

We paid £409 to stay at your cabins from the 19th to the 22ndof October this year. We were unhappy with our stay and on the 20thof October Meg Douglas texted me to say that if we were unhappy that she would be happy to refund us for our stay if we wanted to leave. We then left on the 20thof October and have not received the refund. On the 22ndOctober Guy Douglas stated by telephone and email that you will not refund us despite promising to do so. 

 

We would prefer to have the refund as promised by Meg in her text messages to me, that I have on record. Should you continue to go back on Meg’s promise of a refund then we have no choice but to make a Small Claim in the County Court.

 

We look forward to resolving this matter swiftly. 

We would invite you to carry out your original promise to make the refund. 

 

Regards

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I propose some changes but it's your letter – and your litigation so you have to choose

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I have sent an email incorporating your proposed less confrontational changes. I suspect that they simply won't respond. If that is the case then perhaps I should send a more strident letter indicating that I am willing to submit a small claim as suggested previously. And if that doesn't produce any response after a week then I will submit a small claim. Thanks for your opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that is broadly the plan. You don't lose anything by sending this letter but it is helpful to demonstrate how reasonable and accommodating you have tried to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have replied and said to refer to their previous email which said that they would not be issuing a refund. So it is now step two. Perhaps I could respond with some like the following:

 

Dear Emble Farm

 

I would urge you to reconsider your stance as your text message, that I have kept a record of, made clear that you promised a refund before leaving the premises. If you are unwilling to follow through on your promise then our only source of recourse is a Small Claim through the County courts. Please reconsider your position. 

 

Regards

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that sounds reasonable enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not heard a response from Emble Farm to my last email stating that my only recourse is a Small claim and I doubt that they will. I want to be ready for Tuesday morning when it will have been a week since I sent that email. In the Small claims pre-action protocol it describes the first step as issuing a letter of claim. Do I still need to do this as all of the necessary information was detailed in previous emails and demonstrates a willingness to resolve this issue independently of the County court? Or can I go straight to MoneyClaim and start a claim on Tuesday morning?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should follow the protocol and send a letter of claim giving them 14 days.

I suggest that you posted up here before you send it

Link to post
Share on other sites

The paragraph that starts "I messaged you on the 20th of October" is all unnecessary.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thebeehive said:

 

 

Mr and Mrs Douglas

Emble Farm

Seahouses

NE68 7UY

 

 

Dear Mr and Mrs Douglas

 

Letter of Claim

Holiday Reference Number XXX

 

As you know, after we arrived it your holiday location on XXX date, we took issue with you in terms of the description of the location in your marketing material as compared with the reality on the ground.

After discussion, we received a message from you saying that if we wanted to leave then you would refund us in full. On the basis of that and also on the basis that the holiday location did not fit its description, we took you up on your offer and we left.

Shortly after that you reneged on your promise and refused to give us the refund and despite attempts to contact you about this, you have continued to withhold the agreed refund.

I have to tell you that if you do not provide us with the promised refund within 14 days then we shall sue you in the County Court for the recovery of the promised £409 plus ancillary travel expenses expenses which we incurred travelling to and from your holiday site in reliance upon  the holiday agreement between us, plus interest and without any further notice.
 

 

Regards

 

Dr. Thanh-Lan Gluckman

5/7 Lord Russell Place

Edinburgh 

EH9 1NQ

 

Edited by BankFodder
Dictation typo!!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did it really say that???

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...