Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Nolans SPC Claim perth - Old JDW Cat Debt-


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1006 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

god no!!

 

send the CCA request today.

 

a notice of assignment and a figure owed is not enough to prove you owe the debt.

 

did you not send the IA either demanding documentation be revealled?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I sent a letter of intimation basically saying I still dispute the debt as no evidence has been produced and that even after being asked by the court, Nolan's couldn't produce anything this wasting everbodies time.. tomorrow morning will I say the evidence they have isn't enough to prove the debt? I'll post what they have given as soon as I get home. 

 

Sorry for last minute rush, so much going on just now it's unreal, but I do appreciate your time and help

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Signed consumer credit agreement

no Default Notice under section 87 of the consumer credit act

 

both of which are FATAL to enforcing any debt regulated by the CCA 

 

readme carefully

PRA/Brodies SPC Claimform - old LLoydsTsb Credit Card Debt ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 5 - Scotland Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group

 

filed claim 2nd nov claiming they had all the paperwork

requested by you  - all paperwork in your response xxx date

ordered by the sheriff dated.....

IA issued again by you dated .....

still NOTHING.

 

make sure you demand the sheriff not only dismisses nolans SPECULATIVE CLAIM (you always use those words not just a court claim) each time ) he also issues an absolvitor and your costs too

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, i'm just home now, haven't been able to get a CCA request off today due to working, but here is everything that Nolans has posted on civil online.

 

The evidence delay letter was posted last week i think, and the others were posted up yesterday and I only noticed them today

cabot state.pdf Evidence delay.pdf assignation.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dx100uk said:

filed claim 2nd nov claiming they had all the paperwork

Notice of delay... ref to the above and ram home it clearly states on the original claimform dated 2 nd nov they HAD the agreement..liars!!!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They didnt claim to have all the paperwork did they, they referenced critical dates but didn't list any documents they might have? Or is it in their wording?

 

Is that my argument right there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 17/11/2020 at 21:12, Li4m79 said:

What Documents are listed in Box E2: No Documents Listed

 

yes p'haps nolans are learning then..sorry.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I still demand a signed agreement or do you think the judge will think the notice of assignation and statement is enough to prove the debt? I'm annoyed that they had to provide proof 21 days ago and only provided it the other day, but I'm guessing it's not legally binding and only advisory?

 

I guess all I can do is buy time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, dx100uk said:

No Signed consumer credit agreement

no Default Notice under section 87 of the consumer credit act

 

both of which are FATAL to enforcing any debt regulated by the CCA 

 

readme carefully

PRA/Brodies SPC Claimform - old LLoydsTsb Credit Card Debt ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 5 - Scotland Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group

 

filed claim 2nd nov claiming they had all the paperwork

 

they've had since issuance of the claim...

requested by you  - all paperwork in your response xxx date

ordered by the sheriff dated.....

IA issued again by you dated .....

still NOTHING.

 

make sure you demand the sheriff not only dismisses nolans SPECULATIVE CLAIM (you always use those words not just a court claim) each time ) he also issues an absolvitor and your costs too

 

 

 

as above 

you are in a VERY VERY strong position.

what they have provided so far is useless to their claim

 

you really must get reading the threads i pointed too and ANY nolan threads here

use the search top right

you don't appear to grasp how important a signed CCa is nor a default notice are to enforcement under the CCA ...they CANNOT.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On so just had case meeting, went ok, but could have been much better, judge has given an 8week extension for Nolans to produce the paperwork.   I said they were meant to produce this 21 days ago, but the judge said he understood that and this is a final continuation.  I personally feel 8 weeks is too long but nothing I can do I guess😪

Link to post
Share on other sites

await the fake copy and paste paperwork from cabots filing cabinet that is ofcourse not the original from the original creditor , bet it will be the european rubbish they send.

 

have a look in a few recent CAT claimform threads 

use our search top right

 

the hearing is in 8 weeks, or that is their deadline for disclosure? then a new date will be given?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean he will dismiss the case or you bought up about killing it dead by issuing an absolvitor?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge wasn't entertaining anything, Nolan's said they never received my letter of intimation which is emailed to them, but it wasn't like the sent me the stuff they had. 

 

Can I leave it a couple weeks then ask the judge to drop everything? Or will I just wait it out?

 

I never got to mention an absolvitor, I pretty much got shut down after I kicked off that they had not produced the paperwork 21 days ago when they were meant too 

Edited by Li4m79
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok let it run 

see if they comply.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you read other SPC threads they've had 6mts before now...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've produced a copy of a statement amounting to the figure claimed for AND a copy of the CCA but it isn't signed... Not sure if that's admissible or not due to it being online, it does have my account number and address on, but the customer signature and date section is blank.  They posted this up online the day after the case meeting....

 

Is it game over?

Link to post
Share on other sites

doubt it

scan it all up to one multipage PDF please

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bogroll

 

The Electronic Communications Act 2000 with regards to wet signatures and the requirement of a tick box to validate the application. Docs are devoid of any tick box or any authenticity of IP address conformation check. Therefore the claimant remains in default of my section 78 request and pursuant to section 78  6 a of the CCA1974  the claimant is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.are

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they have to provide full proof that I checked a box in agreement to validate that CCA? And at the minute it's just a piece of paper with my name and (old} address on it?

 

Is it worth putting in another IA a little nearer the time demanding this again? Stating that? Giving them enough time to legally comply, but not too much time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you see the thing is

that document could have come from anywhere

here on CAG

their filing cabinet

then all they do it type your details in....no they wouldn't do that would they....:pound:

 

its supposed to come from the original creditor, and a correct return typically does have a tick box with your typed name by it

and the IP address used and the time of it etc etc.

 

sadly cabot are masters and have alot of filing cabinets.....

lots of claimform threads here on cat debts

 

is the address the correct one for time of sign up?

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original pdf did bring up txt boxes where my details were, it wasn't as if it was a photocopied document with my details embedded and I do find it awfully convenient it appeared the very next day after the case meeting.

 

The address was the same as it should have been, but ive only recently moved, this case was already in motion during my move.

 

Can I then just argue the authenticity of the CCA  at the next meeting? Explain that when put into a editor my personal details and only them pop up as carefully placed text boxes whereas the rest of the form looks photocopied??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...