Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Broke Down but tickets kept coming!! What to do now......?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1255 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry this post is a bit long...

 

My car broke down on the 28th of September this year. It was on a main road,

 

After unsuccessfully trying to re start it several times I called my insurance company and reported the car as being broken down and could they send out one of their operatives to tow it to the usual garage that I use. I was told that someone would be with me in approximately 90 minutes to 2 hours.

 

I had been with my car about 30 minutes when the police drew up and said that they would like to tow my car around the corner as it was causing an obstruction to a busy highway. I said this was fine and they duly towed me around the corner off of the main road. They also provided me with a CAD reference for the incident that I noted.

 

I then waited there until the tow truck turned up about an hour later.

I had already called the usual garage that I use and told them to expect the car and arranged to call them the next morning to see what the issue was with the car before they started work to fix it.

I called the next morning and was told that it would cost quite a lot to fix the car and as it was quite old and also a diesel car that it might be better to scrap the car at this point rather than throw more money at fixing it. I agreed and was then told by the mechanic that I had to make sure I used a reputable scrappage dealer as if the company that I used did not dispose of the car correctly, I could be liable for a fine.

 

I made sure that I researched the company that I used and had to wait until the 16th of October for them to be able to collect the car to scrap it. I had pre agreed that the garage that the car was left outside was to feed the meter whilst it was there (it could not be moved as it was not drivable) and I put a notice in the window of the car that said this and the date that it was going to be picked up to be scrapped). I also left the log book (V5C) with the garage to give to the car scrappage firm and they would then give the yellow slip back to the garage who were to send it to me in the stamped addressed envelope that I had left them. All sounds very easy, doesn't it?

When I went to drop the log book and stamped addressed envelope to the garage, I could see that a parking ticket had already been issued and left on the car. I said to the garage that they had agreed to feed the meter whilst the car was parked there and I would reimburse them for this.

 

the upshot is, that to date, I have had two more tickets that have gone to the full amount (£110 as opposed to the initial amount of £55).

I have appealed all of them including the ticket that I initially got which was still in the £55 as it was within the 14 days, and had a reply back saying that I hadn't shown any proof of the car being broken down.

 

I quoted the CAD reference which is from the Metropolitan Police, I added the cancellation of insurance letter and the letter I sent to the DVLA telling them I was no longer the registered keeper of the car and that it had been sold for scrap.

 

 

In their letter of response to my appealing the ticket the borough council says that, 

'The PCN was issued because your vehicle was parked in a shared use bay during restricted hours without displaying a valid permit (paper or virtual), pay and display ticket or activating cashless parking rights for that bay. And that they noted my comments that your car was towed to this location as it had broken down, and was then left parked there while you researched a scrap dealer.

 

Whilst you have claimed an exemption for this reason, no evidence to support this breakdown was received with your challenge. I must also advise that in instances of a breakdown, drivers must arrange for the vehicle to be removed from the public highway within 24 hours. As you have stated the breakdown occurred on 28 September 2020, there is no exemption in this case'.


If drivers are unable to relocate their vehicle, they must purchase parking time to cover it for the entire duration it will be parked. In a shared use bays such as this one, drivers may purchase a pay and display ticket from the machine, or activate a cashless parking session'. the garage said they would do this for me but did not!

I have now had a notification from the DVLA (just received today) that they registered the fact that I am no longer the registered keeper of the car and I got a letter from the insurance company to day that I had indeed broken down.

 

I would have thought a CAD reference from the Met Police would hold more clout than an insurance company, but, anyway...the letter from the borough council says that I either need to pay, or go forward with a further challenge and they will not take any further information in to account for this ticket.

 

I have not one, not two but three of these tickets that were issued whilst the car was sitting outside the garage unable to be moved as it was not drivable (2 of which have gone to the higher amount of £110)

 

Need your help...Please!

Yours sincerely and in anticipation
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The garage put the car in the parking bay after inspecting it? They then failed to keep feeding the meter for you? I would say your argument is primarily with them, but forcing them to pay the PCNs doesn't seem realistic, so they've landed you in it.

 

In terms of your appeal, I would be looking for proof it was towed to the garage, some sort of paperwork from the garage, proof it was scrapped - that kind of thing. It's not a guaranteed win, but stronger then just proving you're no longer the keeper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...