Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Airbnb refunds and the new England lockdown


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1258 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am posting here on behalf of my daughter who has had to cancel her trip to London due to the new Covid lockdown in England.

 

She is due to stay at an Airbnb for one night at the end of this week but due to the new lockdown it is illegal for her to travel as it is for leisure purposes and not essential.

 

She has contacted Airbnb and the hotel itself and they have said she is not entitled to a refund or rebook as the hotel remains open.  She is a student and doesnt have a lot of money and cant afford to just loose £70.

 

I was wondering if there would be any loophole with this.  The T&Cs say that they will not refund under "extenuating circumstances" after March.

 

I have checked the Government website and it obviously says that you cannot travel unless its essential and that hotels are able to remain open but for certain scenarios only and none of them are for leisure purposes.

 

I guess there must be an awful lot of people in this same situation but if anyone has any ideas it would be much appreciated.

 

One site suggested a chargeback with the bank but what would she say? 

 

Many thanks

LTB

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly think that a chargeback is the place to start. Tell her to contact the bank and say that she made the contract which is now become unlawful to fulfil because of government regulations and that you have tried to raise this with Airbnb and they have declined. Tell the bank that Airbnb are acting unlawfully and that she wants the chargeback.

Come back here and let us know what they say. There are more aggressive ways to deal with it including saying that it is a frustrated contract although there could be difficulties in this case. Chargeback is the best way to start.

When did she make the booking?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BankFodder,

 

Thank you so much for your reply.

 

She only made it quite recently, about a month ago at a guess.  It was a treat for her boyfriends birthday.  They were going to do some sightseeing, dinner at the shard but unfortunately her plans have been shortlived due to whats now going on.

 

I will certainly help her start the ball rolling with the chargeback and of course I will update here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure it was going to be a lovely treat – but frankly anybody who makes these kinds of arrangements at this period in the crisis is pushing their luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As evidence for the chargeback I would cite the official government guidance that says:

 

To reduce social contact, the regulations require some businesses to close and impose restrictions on how some businesses provide goods and services. These include:

 

  • Accommodation such as hotels, hostels, guest houses and campsites. Except for specific circumstances, such as where these act as someone’s main residence, where the person cannot return home, for homeless people, or where it is essential to stay there for work purposes

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/new-national-restrictions-from-5-november

 

As the hotel could not legally have allowed your daughter to stay in the hotel if she had arrived and attempted to check in the hotel would have to have camcelled her booking. So she's entitled to her money back.

 

The actual legislation is the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) (No. 4) Regulations 2020 paragraphs 18 (5) and 18 (6)

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1200/regulation/18

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...