Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Garage Rip off??


Knocky1892
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter, who is studying to become a primary school teacher, required a MOT for her Fiat 500. She booked it in at the garage which has carried out previous service/MOT/repairs. They have been very fair and helpful up to this point.

 

The car passed the MOT with an advisory to replace brake pads and shoes in the not too distant future (but not a fail and not an urgent requirement). While getting MOT daughter was encouraged to have a full diagnostic check on car. In their own words "it will tell you everything wrong with the car, even the radio" . She went with the diagnostic check and it came back as requiring a new throttle, as the engine had 'lag' or a loss of power while travelling at speed. There was also a small leak on exhaust seal.

 

The garage informed her that whilst neither was urgent and would not get worse, the throttle issue would continue to irritate until fixed. Reluctantly she took their advice and paid £216 (including £49 for diagnostic check). She really couldn't afford it, as she is a student but also needs her car to get to and from the school she is studying at. She picked car up on Tuesday evening after school and travelled home on slow local roads. When travelling to school on Wednesday morning, via dual carriageway, she noticed that the same loss of power issue was still present.

 

On driving home, luckily at a slowish speed, her brakes failed completely and she failed to stop at a junction and travelled straight through with barely any reduction in speed, with her brake pedal flat to the floor. 

She dropped her car off at garage again on way to school on the Thursday morning. On Thursday evening, she rang me in tears. The garage wanted £400 for replacement of brake pads and shoes and also replacement of coils and plugs to fix 'lag' in engine. She explained that she had had diagnostic check on Tuesday and had already paid to repair 'lag' issue but it hadn't solved problem. Now they want more money to fix the same issue. They said that they were different issues and that the coil and plugs would not have been picked up on diagnostic check. She feels as if they have 'tried it on' because they could tell she knows nothing about cars (me neither).

 

My issue is two-fold. I too think that they have charged her twice to fix the same problem. We have no idea if throttle replacement was required. It certainly didn't solve problem highlighted on diagnostic check. Secondly and more importantly, they passed her MOT with brakes that were clearly shot. This could have resulted in more damage to both car and my daughter. They refused to release car without payment and members of staff ridiculed her for getting upset as they left workshop. 

 

Car anyone give us any advice regarding whole situation and possible recompense please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is certainly a bit convoluted and it will be difficult to tease out exactly what has happened.

However you have two problems here. The first problem is that you need to get the car back because presumably the car is needed by your daughter and not only that I can imagine that if it is not sorted out quickly, that the garage will start to add storage costs which may or may not be enforceable but which will complicate the issue and make the whole thing more expensive.

The second issue is the much more legal issue of the money which has been spent and what it has been spent on and the failure of any repairs. This is altogether more corrugated.

My advice to you would be to minimise the problems and that is to get the car out of there and then we can examine what has been paid and what shouldn't have been paid with a view to claiming as much as possible back from the garage – probably by means of a legal action.

Another advantage of getting the car out is that you will be able to get independent inspections of it and the work which may have been done and its condition generally. While the car is with the garage, you have no access to it and nor will any independent inspectors.

If you feel that you would rather reserve your position and deal with the whole thing at one time then I can tell you that it's going to be a long slog and I can imagine it would be at least two or three months and maybe more before a court action moves to a judgement which would then allow you to recover the car. Furthermore, there could be a slight risk that you would lose the court action in which case you would still have to recover the car and be faced with storage charges which I'm quite sure the garage would want to add simply in retaliation if nothing else.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally, has the work on the replacement brakes been carried out? You want to get hold of all the old part so you can have them inspected. I can imagine that if the work is already being carried out then those parts will probably have been disposed of – for whatever reason. If the work hasn't been done then you certainly want to require that the parts are kept.

Incidentally, you need to do all of your communication with this garage in writing or if you do it on the phone then make sure that you have read our customer services guide and you have implemented the advice there. It is essential that you start keeping a close detailed record of everything that happens and all of your exchanges

 

Just to add to this, if the work is not being carried out then how much does the garage want so far simply to allow you to take the car away?

I would be really tempted to get the car out of there and then have it done by an independent garage we could give you a complete assessment of the condition of everything and also carry out the repairs.

Then you would be in an excellent position to attack the first garage for the recovery of unnecessary expenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. We have the car (daughter paid on card as she was upset and intimidated) and all repair had been done. No opportunity was given to seek second opinion or even to accept cost of coil and plugs. Usually they would ring to get permission to go ahead with repair. This time they had carried out brake repair (agreed) and replaced (?) coil and plugs and refused to return car unless money was paid. Daughter was alone in dark at garage on industrial estate, having been dropped off by grandfather 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that the repairs were carried out without any authorisation?

How long ago were they carried out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brakes were obviously authorized but not other work. My problem with brakes was that they were so bad that they completely failed and yet the day before they were deemed good enough to pass MOT with just an advisory. Very dangerous and potentially more costly 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact them immediately and confirm by email that you want all of the brake parts retained. Of course they will say that they are no longer there – but anyway contact them on the telephone and then send them an email and refer specifically to the telephone call in which you asked them to retain the parts.

Tell them that you will be along to collect the parts this afternoon.

Get ready for them to say that they have already been thrown away – but at least get it on record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Knocky1892 said:

Brakes were obviously authorized but not other work. My problem with brakes was that they were so bad that they completely failed and yet the day before they were deemed good enough to pass MOT with just an advisory. Very dangerous and potentially more costly 

 

And possibly the most significant part of the problem...your daughter could have killed someone or herself and as such Im sure the relevant authorities (VOSA etc) would be interested in this and possibly informed of the negligence.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/complain-about-an-mot

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After they have told you that they have thrown the parts away, the next thing to do will be to assess how much you should reasonably have paid to them for any work which might have been done.

Clearly the MOT is extremely suspect and so it seems to me that for the safety of your daughter she should go for another MOT.

I think it's worth going to a completely separate garage – may be some distance away. Tell the garage the entire story of what has happened and so asked them to do the MOT with particular care.

Ask them to doublecheck the work which has been carried out and to identify any other faults. I think this is an important first step in comparing the two MOT's and also getting a separate opinion as to the condition of the car and the work which has been done.

Come back here and let us know what has happened. I expect that we will have to suggest that you get a more detailed independent inspection afterwards but that will be more expensive and so we will get to that when it comes.

The intention is to understand what is the condition of the car – how efficient the first MOT was – and the quality of the work which has been carried out.

Once we can put a figure together, then we will start dealing with the garage and making a claim. I think that the point which has just been made by my site team colleague about the dangerous condition in which they allow the car to go is extremely important and I would have thought it would be useful to leverage that against them.

By the way I suddenly realise that we don't know what the name of the garage is? Which is the garage please – don't be shy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. I was furious that they put peoples lives at risk. And at the same time ploughed ahead with less urgent work without authorisation 

 

I will post name of garage asap. Thank you all for such good advice. I was going to go to garage in person today as I wasn't involved with transaction. I'm very disappointed at service (but not surprised) as we have used this garage without problem for quite a while. I'll make sure of correct name and get it on here in next few minutes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if the pads where near limit they should of stated that the pads on the limit but if the pads where looking below the limit they should of failed the mot so it seems the mechanics are clueless that you took it to

 

shoes would be a lie because they don't take the wheels or drums off to check life span on shoes and shoes do last alot of mileage my car as 100k on a picanto and still dont need replacing

 

wont suprise me if the garage didn't even change the rear shoes and if i was you dont take it to the garage you used from now on take elsewhere

 

also if i was you leave a bad review on google maps of the garage and did you check the reviews before taking it to that garage

 

 

 

 

Edited by ukshane4life
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...