Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god this blokes a piece of work... and now has to resort to dodgy car dealing... oh how things have changed for him....just to continue his like of extortion..   dx  
    • Thank you I shall. No word from them yet. I did manage to speak to a solicitor in regards their Ts & Cs. They are of the same opinion that their "blanket" terms are not really applicable to this unique situation.  Thank you for your help. 
    • I have just consulted the Spirits  aka  The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions which covers the situation where the PCN is not able to be placed on the windscreen nor is it handed to the driver. "    Penalty charge notices — service by a civil enforcement officer 9.  Where a civil enforcement officer has reason to believe that a penalty charge is payable with respect to a vehicle which is stationary in a civil enforcement area, he may serve a penalty charge notice— (a)by fixing it to the vehicle; or (b)giving it to the person appearing to him to be in charge of the vehicle."                                          That was Regulation 9 so now Regulation 10 follows Penalty charge notices — service by post 10.—(1) An enforcement authority may serve a penalty charge notice by post where— (a)on the basis of a record produced by an approved device, the authority has reason to believe that a penalty charge is payable with respect to a vehicle which is stationary in a civil enforcement area; (b)a civil enforcement officer attempted to serve a penalty charge notice in accordance with regulation 9 but was prevented from doing so by some person; or (c)a civil enforcement officer had begun to prepare a penalty charge notice for service in accordance with regulation 9, but the vehicle concerned was driven away from the place in which it was stationary before the civil enforcement officer had finished preparing the penalty charge notice or had served it in accordance with regulation 9, and references in these Regulations to a “regulation 10 penalty charge notice” are to a penalty charge notice served by virtue of this paragraph.   Points b and c are effectively saying that as the PCN was not able to be placed on the windscreen either because the car was driven off before completion or the driver refused to accept the PCN when it was handed to them then the PCN can be serviced by post.  Therefore the PCN to comply with PoFA should arrive within 14 days of the alleged offence or at least within 28 days.   (3) A regulation 10 penalty charge notice shall be served on the person appearing to the enforcement authority to be the owner of the vehicle involved in the contravention in consequence of which the penalty charge is payable. (4) Subject to paragraph (6), a regulation 10 penalty charge notice may not be served later than the expiration of the period of 28 days beginning with the date on which, according to a record produced by an approved device, or information given by a civil enforcement officer, the contravention to which the penalty charge notice relates occurred (in these Regulations called “the 28-day period”).   So that is what should have happened when the PCN was not served at the time. Though the parking attendant may well deny what actually happened so we may be no further forward but we now know that they sent the ticket too late but will Parking control accept it.  
    • Thank you Slick. I haven’t supplied them with any bank details or signed a DD mandate. I’ll keep you posted! 
    • hey well done, you might have saved her a pot of money there and nicely removed her from the DCA's cash cow milking troughs..sad as always these supposed free debt charities give such poor advice..8yrs of money down the drain..simply running the sb date to infinity.   as for cap1  i've highlighted a few things above in answer. do any fees appear on 1st statement you have?   as for the PPI payments, inc each of those too, even though that bird has flown.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 32 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

TV licensing and Data Protection


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, 

 

Please move this thread if another subforum suits better, I couldn't see any specific ones.    

 

My wife has just had a threatening letter from TV Licensing.  For the last year we have been getting threatening letters to "The Resident" which have been ignored as we have no need of their services.  

 

She has never had any contact with them at our current address.

  Is this a data protection breech?

  Do they have to tell her how they got her information?

How can we complain and get her details removed from their systems?  

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will guess you have not long resided there?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it addressed to your wife or simply the occupier?

 

Either way, ignore them, it's just a computer generated threatogramme they spit out on a cycle every three months, I've got a stack of their silly missives threatening this that and tother, the worst thing you can do is to be reeled in by their empty threats and start corresponding with them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its now named to my wife which is why its so odd as all the household bills are in my name.  

 

I dont really want to correspond with them as you say I will get sucked it.  I will ignore it, probably best.  

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, simply ignore them, once they have sent a small forest of idle threats they'll address them to 'the legal occupier'' then you know you've won and you can continue ignoring them in the knowledge that they can't do anything because they have no idea who lives at the address.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

simply got the name from her credit file as a registered voter at a property that previously the old owner had no licence for

hence says the occupier.

now all they have done is looked at credit file/voters register.

 

safe to ignore

if you ever get a powerless capita foot solider at your door ignore them

they are just like a DCA and have zero legal powers.

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you prefer a more forthright approach, e-mail [email protected] demanding they cease and desist sending you harassing communication.

 

If they continue, ignore it and keep it as evidence. If they send anyone, ignore them, document it and keep it as evidence.

 

I would then refer to the CABs comprehensive advice on taking action about harassment.

Edited by FruitSalad1010
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, MrJohnW said:

Its now named to my wife which is why its so odd as all the household bills are in my name.  

 

I dont really want to correspond with them as you say I will get sucked it.  I will ignore it, probably best.  

 

Thanks

 

Don't know whether this still happens, but I bought a TV from Curry's about 14 years ago and they put down my house number wrong on Curry's records.  About a month later a neighbour gave me a letter from TV licencing asking why I did not have a licence at my neighbours address.

 

If this still happens, with retailers passing on data, then could this be reason for wife's name showing ?

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No longer happens UB, I remember when they changed that ruling, I went to my local Argos and bought an indoor aerial and they tried to tell me that they needed my name and address for TVL.

 

Told them that was no longer the case, sure enough the duty manager confirmed it.

 

Not sure why it was changed, might have had something to do with the DPA?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

capita look at voters via credit files and after the usual to 'the occupier' letter they then typically send it to anyone not a child at an address.

my neighbour cancelled his licence more than 18mts ago now and still regularly get letters to all 3 adults living therein rotation

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

 

If this still happens, with retailers passing on data, then could this be reason for wife's name showing ?

Retailers no longer need to tell TV Licensing who they sell TVs to. The requirement was abolished in 2013.

 

Reason was that it was considered an unnecessary bureaucratic burden and was abolished as part of the government's 'cutting red tape' initiative at the time.

Edited by Ethel Street
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...