Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Movie theatres are welcoming back audiences on Friday hoping there is pent-up demand for a night out. View the full article
    • god where ever did you find all that twaddle rabbit hole stuff to go down .... no wonder you came here...we don't allow nor portray twaddle , neither lead people doen rabbit holes that then cost them money by sending PM's offering help of anything upto £360 for even a failed CCJ defence...   anyway enough of that BS. lets get you moving in the right direct , you should be ok as CEL are always losers if you do things correctly   can you fill this out please:   Received a Court Claim From A Private parking Speculative invoice?? - How To Deal With It HERE***Updated Aug 2016*** - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group
    • A growing number of clubs big and small are using more technology to help performances on the pitch. View the full article
    • Where was the help for the environment, social care, renters, and to cover the future costs of Covid? View the full article
    • Hi All, I have received a parking ticket as RK (thats registered keeper right?) for overstaying by 16 mins in a well known wholesalers car park in Liverpool. I read some very confusing (and sometimes contradictory information on several sites) on how to deal with this. I followed the instructions to firstly challenge the validity of their claim. I wrote to them (no response) and emailed them. I had to guess at the email address because they provide only the registered office address or a 'claim line', which if i had contacted them on that, would have been agreeing to their idea of us having a contract in the first place (right?). i eventually got the admin email and sent it there, stating that i had already written to them with no response. I got a response saying that they do not respond to correspondence at that address and i should either write to them (already did) or contact via the appeals line or appeals email (again with the acknowledgement that its an appeal i need, rather than straight up confirmation). I asked in at the wholesalers customer/ member services in store about the car park ownership and they informed me it was a consistent problem and they didnt know the owner. I have contacted the head office in Herts for the information. (Customer services/ member services/ online services & complaints) for the information regarding ownership of carpark and the contract of agreement between them and the CE parking management with no luck. I received no further correspondence and therefore assumed that they had dropped their spurious claims. They acknowledged my letter with: "Response from representation team -  We refer to your recent correspondence. We accept for you to pay the original reduced sum of £100. The Parking Charge Notice has been passed to a debt recovery agency. All further enquiries, including payments, must be directed to them. Please follow the instruction on the correspondence you have received." I received nothing else until I receive a Northampton county court business service court claim. The amount is now in the hundreds (£274). I have acknowledged and sent back the form with nothing else written on it. now i have another week or so to mount my defence. I dont know anyone who speaks 'legalese' and frankly its giving me sleepless nights. Incidentally, at the time of the alleged 'contravention' there was a bout of sudden severe weather which was 'waited out' inside the wholesalers porch by several members and their children because the soft furnishings and electricals (for example) bought in store would have been destroyed by the downpour. Further investigation into the owner of the Civil Enforcement ltd has shown me that they are owned by CCP parking, who are in turn owned by Qa Nominees and are owned by people exposed in the Panama Papers scandal.   I am feeling like im a tiny part of a very big scam here, one that DVLA are profiting from. Under advisement, I have written a complaint to the wholesalers complaining about being treated so shoddily as a member. Under advisement, I have also written to CE ltd requesting a Subject Access Request. But I really dont understand the process or what steps to take now.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

PRA/Brodies SPC Claimform - old LLoydsTsb Credit Card Debt ***Claim Dismissed***


Recommended Posts

A detailed statement of the account and how, with specific reference toward

additional interest added because of late/no payment, any additional penalty

fees or interest added and any Payment Protection Insurance have resulted in the balance now claimed.

 

The court will be aware that penalty charges and their recoverability thereof have been

judicially declared to be susceptible to assessments of fairness under the Unfair

Terms in the Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 The Office of Fair Trading v

Abbey National PLC and others (2009). Likewise PPI previously was recoverable under various rulings.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

form is on the response thread already here  knock up something we'll adapt it.   What To Do - Simple Procedure Rule Claims Scotland - Scotland Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action

It must annoy the courts to be used in this manner, especially in the midst of a pandemic and more serious issues to attend to. Its certainly been educational anyway!  Set up a small permanent mo

The sum claimed is completely comprised of penalty charges and PPI and the interest these accrued.

It is my belief these were reclaimed upon my behalf and i was latterly informed by my DMP Provider the account was cleared.  I have been unable to ascertain any new proof to date, as the debt management company managing this account on my behalf entered liquidation some manys years ago and The liquidators tell me they hold no client data.

i personally hold no paperwork of that age as i believed the matter was resolved by my paid for DMP Plan Provider some xxx yrs ago  and thus i destroyed my records.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get the submission in first

then it might pay you to confirm say by looking at another debt thru the DMP when payments to that debt ceased too.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh yea you have a thread too

send link an sar .

this could help with this debt with regard to last payment date matching etc.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to respond via the online portal as is now required, however i keep getting the message that "email address, case reference number or claimant name cannot be verified" I have checked repeatedly and they match the court document exactly. Can anyone can think of anything I may be doing wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

its new they never work.

 

simply email the clerk of the court at inverness your response form and brodies (see their letter)

 

Inverness Sheriff Court and Justice of the Peace Court (scotcourts.gov.uk)

find...

Electronic submission of documents PDF 195.62 KB 19 Jun, 2020

 

 

i think is correct.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

After some perseverance I have just managed to send using the portal.

Seems it does not like rocketmail addresses.

It was still very awkward to get thru tho.

Brodies have ticked the box to be notified by the court. If I email them a copy also is there any risk associated with them having my email?

I ticked contact by post only on the form if that makes any difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rocket is always blocked as sadly 99% of those are spam as well as proton email AD's

 

there doesn't appear to be any issue with scottish claimants using/having a respondents email AD as with english claims with deadlines. the scottish system doesn't allow crafty claims/disclosures without reply.

 

well done.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Case management discussion scheduled Thurs 11th of Feb. Is it time to send CCA request to PRA group? 

Letter also encourages claimant and respondent to contact each other to seek to settle case or narrow the issues in dispute, should i contact them or  leave well alone?

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes sure

So we know what you filed

Post your reply form up

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, highlands said:

Letter also encourages claimant and respondent to contact each other to seek to settle case or narrow the issues in dispute, should i contact them or  leave well alone?

 

yours until or unless an sar appears with anything useful is not the next move.

 

Broadies don't often act like other solicitors we see in scottish claims like Nolans, whom are absolutely atrocious toward respondents and usually do as little as possible to reduce their involvement so thus their expenses, as they know once defended properly, there is little chance they get anything extra out of you or the claimant.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure its significant but received letter from PRA group acknowledging cca request and returning postal order as they don't charge.

Contained information sheet saying it can be a reconstructed agreement, doesn't need the date or my signature, also may take longer than 12 days if they have to contact the original creditor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is also worthy to note yours is pre the recon 2006 CCA changes and a recon won't wash in court 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds tsb sar arrived, they have the same cca but much clearer.

 

Looked through lloyds credit card statements,  

one statement for April shows a charge off account and a refund of interest which take the balance to zero.

I have no statement from May.

 

The June statement shows the balance returned to the original figure and a credit which looks to be the first from Compass.

 

It is a large file and i am still sorting through it.

Also shows another account for a loan which was being paid by Compass, the final payment from them made on 18th dec 15.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so this is sort of confirming the way we are looking to go.

the CCA is most probably enforceable, though it would nice to see this better copy, just for ref and the T&C's that go with it that PRA have not sent. above all you keep this to yourself. as with anything else you discover in the sar thats useful or not until we decide to use it formally or not.

 

as forthe statements, again this sort of aligns with our thoughts that its not SB'd either (5yrs in scotland)

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no T&C's attached, its just the same photocopy that PRA provided but full A4 size and readable.

It refers to conditions overleaf but there is no copy of the other side included in the sar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats very useful to you,

not only does it show that all the prescribed terms and conditions which must be contained on the signed agreement are not there , it also shows that there are no associated terms and conditions which are several pages long, must be those at the time of you signing and must contain your details.

 

so we know if the fleecers produces anything further regarding the cca..its a fake and NOT from the original creditor

they've also not produced 

the default

notice of assignment LLoyds to AK

notice of assignment AK to PRA.

 

not looking good for them.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you mean the CCA sure but yes you must always redact things you put up as we have to abide by data protection and ofcourse you/we are anon anyway

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to PRA/Brodies SPC Claimform - old LLoydsTsb Credit Card Debt ***Claim Dismissed***

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...