Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRA/Brodies SPC Claimform - old LLoydsTsb Credit Card Debt ***Claim unilaterally abandoned by Claimant***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1132 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am not sure if i am posting this correctly so apologies in advance if i am not.

 

In 2007  I handed over various debts to Compass debt counsellors, all paperwork was forwarded to them at their request and i no longer have any records.

 

At some point in 2015 i stopped hearing from Compass altogether and my payments stopped, later i discovered they had closed down, losing a sum of money they had put aside for settlements too.

 

Much to my surprise and relief none of my creditors contacted me apart from a statement of account for one of the larger debts which never contained any demand for payment.

 

On 05th november i was served claim forms by Sheriffs officers from PRA group and Brodies solicitors.

 

The claim relates to a credit card issued by LloydTsb  "on or about the 01st november 2000", payment was being made by Compass of £5.27 per month until "on or around Dec 29th".

 

I am unsure how to proceed, I cant really deny the debt as it looks like had been paying it in the past, should i use the section of the form to apply for time to pay?

 

The last response date is 06/01/2021.

 

Thanks in advance to anyone who can offer some advice on this.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PRA SPC Claim - old LLoydsTsb Credit Card Debt

please complete this:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

name the issuing court: Inverness, The Inverness Justice Centre, Inverness, IV1 !ah

 

Who Is The Claimant: PRA(Group)UK Ltd, 15-17 Elmfield Road Bromley, Kent Br1 1LT

 

Who Are the Solicitors: Brodies LLP, 110 Queen Street, Glasgow, G1 3BX

 

What type of action? (Simple/Ordinary):Simple 

 

D1...What is the claim for –

 

On or about 1 November 2000 Lloyds TSB Bank plc entered into a credit agreement (herinafter referred to as "the agreement")with the respondent. A copy of the agreement will be produced. The respondent failed to maintain payment of the instalments due in terms of the Agreement.

 

On or around 13 april 2007, Lloyds TSB Bank Plc served a default Notice on the respondent.

The respondent failed to make payment in satisfaction of the Default Notice.

Lloyds TSB Bank Plc terminated the Agreement.

The balance outstanding in terms of the Agreement is £2.953.11 which is the sum sued for.

 

On or around 27 June 2013 Lloyds TSB Bank Plc's rights in terms of the agreement were assigned to the claimant. Notice of the assignation was intimated to the Respondent.

 

Since the termination of the Agreement, the Respondent has made payments to account in respect of the sums due.

At no time since the termination of the Agreement has there been a continuous period of five years in which the obligation to the Pursuer has not been relevantly acknowledged.

The Respondent last acknowledged the sums due and outstanding under and in terms of the agreement by making a payment of £5.27 on or around 29 December 2015.

 

The Respondent has been called upon to make payment of the sum sued for but has refused or at least delayed to do so. The action is accordingly necessary.

 

 [D4 BOX SPR FORM] or [Condescendence from Writ]

Date of Agreement:     1 November 2000

Unpaid balance:           £2,953.11

 

Balance is due under a credit card agreement which commenced with a nil balance.

 

date of raised claim [or court stamp date from writ or date from ] :- 2 november 2020

 

Last Date Of Service [or from form 07]:- 16/12/2020

 

Last Date For Response [or from form 07]:- 06/01/2021

 

What Documents are listed in Box E2:[or in your form requesting the same?]  1. Agreement

 

Is the claim for ......an Overdraft, credit card, loan account, HP Agreement, Catalogue or mobile phone debt? :- Credit card.

 

BOX D4 what has the claimant stated: IN FULL

 

Date of Agreement: – 1 November 2000


Reference Number: – is this the original creditors account number? (y/n) , No number stated.

how many digits does it have? No number stated.
Unpaid balance: - £2,953.11

 

BOX D5 what has the claimant stated: IN FULL or [Pleas in law from the writ]

 

The claimant wants the court to order the respondent to pay the claimant the sum of TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THREE POUNDS AND ELEVEN PENCE(£2953.11) STERLING with interest on the sum at  the rate of 8% per cent per annum from the date of citation until payment.

…..

 

from your knowledge: answer the following:

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before 2007.

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.:- Assigned  and it is purchaser who has issued the claim.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I cannot remember.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I cannot remember.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

When was you last payment:-  Going by the citation it was around the 29 December 2015. 

 

Why did you cease payments:- Compass debt counsellors were managing my debts and went into liquidation. I was not contacted by creditors aside from one larger account who sent me statements of account for a while.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

 

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you.

 

nothing much to do yet bar a few background questions for the moment

you are in the info gathering stage

 

we know the scammers that ran compass well

can you just confirm its this lot please

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/directors-of-debt-management-company-disqualified-for-29-years

as going by previous info we have 

it extremely doubtful a payment was made in dec 2015

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wonder if the administrator have AC details

you've loads of time to get an sar in for all the details

if this were statute barred (5yrs) the debt would not exist

 

there are loads of threads here on compass/RMR, most indicate payments stopped in 2014 what the firm went into liquidation  , i can find no other that tallies with dec 2015

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lloyds is no good

On or around 27 June 2013 Lloyds TSB Bank Plc's rights in terms of the agreement were assigned to the claimant. Notice of the assignation was intimated to the Respondent.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i wouldnt trust a dca as far as i could kick them they LIE.

 

ideally you need to send an sar to administrators of compass 

if you use our search top right you might find the info upon who that is 

i haven't the time.

 

i believe someone else took their portfolio on too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep you wasted £1000's there sadly.

you paid for everyones drinks down the pub for years and probably a few staff holidays.

for them and the fleecing DCA's.

 

we have weeks yet so if you cant find things i prob can

just got a few things on 

the info will be out there.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The insolvency practitioners were AABRS     There are lots of links on google about compass. I will see if they can give me the info regarding last payments.

How the directors avoided jail is quite something, still I am where I am so best not dwell on it. Thanks again for your help, looking forward to a somewhat better nights sleep now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes have a ring around

ask them who might hold the data of old customers.

 

if my memory serves me correct i believe one of them was previously jailed for another company they ran some +15yrs earlier and did the same to customers with them.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no harm in posting it here for others that might hit this same issue and read your thread.

 

well done!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reply from AABRS

Dear Xxxx

 

We regret we are unable to assist. While we do have records they are of such quantity that researching the same for any information that may or may not assist would be prohibitively time consuming, costly and of no benefit to the liquidation estate. 
 

Doesn’t look too hopeful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tough for them then.

 

email back and state.

 

please find attached a subject access request that by Law you are duty bound to respond too within 30days.

 

Compass failed to administer the money i PAID THEM  properly and i have no idea where it went.

This has resulted in one of my old debts within the useless DMP i had with them now being subject to a serious court claim against me.

 

My general research indicates Compass failed to pay any creditors of most of their customers months if not years before their demise.

This points me toward the debt now being extinquished under scottish law, however i need the information.

 

please be advised that should you fail to comply to my legal right, i shall have no alternative but to inform the sheriff of the court who will most likely deal with you directly as the need for this information is a very important part of my proposed defence.

 

...................

 

click SAR  for what to attach.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Line 2 above

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ideally so would i 

but where compass are concerned they would have received all the letters destined to you so might not have updated their records.

PRA will in the fullness of time have to produce everything they intend to rely upon should the claim get that far and ofcourse you'll be requesting all such when your form 4a goes in, but thats not for almost 2mts yet...

 

info gathering is the name of the game till then..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...