Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fallen behind on PCP, company called Anglia trying to contact me.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1243 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, hope someone can offer some advice.

 

During the last lockdown, me and the mrs were both furloughed from our minimum wage jobs. Tried our hardest to keep on top of bills, rent, council tax and food all obviously taking priority.

 

Unfortunately, during that time we missed two of our PCP payments to Ford Credit.

 

Contacted them through their web portal, asking for a payment break - flat out declined, no reason given.

 

Now, a couple of months later, I have a rep from a company called Anglia trying to contact me. Not spoken to them yet - I work as a van driver (not been furloughed second time round, yet) and can't take calls during the day. And, to be honest, not keen on speaking to them until I know a little more about what they're about. Don't want to drop myself in it by saying the wrong thing.

 

Situation re the finance is thus:

 

PCP is due to end next August.

We have paid off over 50% of the car.

We owe two missed payments.

We were thinking of trying to terminate the agreement early, even before we missed any payments, as we bought this car when I was in a better job and we had less debt. Now the payments are more of a burden than they used to be, so we were thinking of handing the car back, cancelling the agreement and buying a much cheaper used car to keep us going through the lean times.

 

Given all this information, what do people think would be a good course of action to take? We're already stressed enough as it is with trying to catch up on bills atm (as I imagine many, many people are) and having another company chasing us about a vehicle that, in all honesty, feels more of a burden than a blessing these days, is the last thing we want.

 

Thanks in advance for any advice, guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have paid more than 1/3rd, the car is now considered protected goods under the consumer credit act

NO-ONE let alone anglia - who are a powerless repo company can take the car without YOU agreeing to give it too them. - don't!!

 

for now don't park the car on a public road mind

 

they CANNOT take it from private land like your driveway and 1000% are not bailiffs or anything and have ZERO legal powers whatsoever.

no need to engage with them at all.

 

it's worthy to note should they take the car, you can take them to court and void the whole agreement and keep the car and get all your payments back under the CCA.

 

i would expect ford credit have defaulted your credit file and must of sent numerous letters , as its unusual to not hear anything previous

 

you are quite entitled to hand the car back 

BUT DO NOT RING ANYONE AND DO NOT GO FOR A VOLUNTARY SURRENDER

 

you have paid more than 50% so you will owe nothing more

voluntary terminate your agreement today

follow the guide below.

you are also safe to now stop any further payments once you have sent our letter.

 

........................

 

Section 99 of the Consumer Credit Act gives the debtor the right to terminate a hire purchase agreement, 
simply by giving written notice of termination. 
.
The right to terminate applies at any time before the final payment becomes due, unless the creditor has already terminated. 
contrary to the line taken by many finance companies, 
.
the debtor need not have paid half the total amount payable, 
and nor do they have to pay any arrears, [read below carefully regarding arrears ].
.
before exercising the right to terminate.
 .
Sections 99 and 100 set out the debtor's liability on voluntary termination. 

The sections are complex, 
but their main effect can be summarised in brief as follows. 
.
If the sum of payments made and arrears before termination exceeds 50% of the total price, 
than the debtor is only liable to pay the arrears. 
.
Otherwise, the debtor is liable to pay half the total price, less any payments already made.
 . 
so the debtor can terminate at any time if he has reached the 50 % mark but would be liable for any payments still to reach the 50 % mark,
 .  
it does not matter if the account is in arrears at the time or request to do a voluntary termination.
.
you need to specifically nail them down that this is a VT and NOT a VS Voluntary surrender].
dont get caught out!!
.
take extensive photos and video of the car inside and out 
and underneath [use a selfie stick] and in the engine compartment 
ALWAYS.
.
if they try and charge a repo fee or collection fee they cannot:
.
The only charges you must pay are the ones contained in the legislation and itemised in section 101, 
the charge mentioned is levied after the agrement is terminated and is void in any case. 
.
All it means is that no one will collect the terminated car(their car), well that is ther problem it is no longer yours , your attachment to the car has been terminated..
.
173 Contracting-out forbidden.
(1)A term contained in a regulated agreement or linked transaction, or in any other agreement relating to an actual or prospective regulated agreement or linked transaction, is void if, and to the extent that, it is inconsistent with a provision for the protection of the debtor or hirer or his relative or any surety contained in this Act or in any regulation made under this Act.
.
This term is covered by the above section of the CCA 1974 in that it breaches this:
.
 99 Right to terminate hire-purchase etc. agreements.
.
 (1)At any time before the final payment by the debtor under a regulated hire-purchase or regulated conditional sale agreement falls due, the debtor shall be entitled to terminate the agreement by giving notice to any person entitled or authorised to receive the sums payable under the agreement
.
 In other words nothing can stop you voluntarily terminating.
.
although dependant on the way your agreement is written, they can charge excess mileage
.
 this has been accepted at county court level, but afaik has not been tested in a higher court
..
.
.

..............example letter..ADAPT TO SUIT.............
.
You must vt under s99/100 cca1974. do not sign any of their forms, or agree to pay anything. 
.
The car has just to be in reasonable condition for its age. 

If you have paid in excess of 50%, 
with no arrears there will be nothing to pay.
.
Send them the following letter, 
they MUST action your request, 
you should endeavour to be present at the vehicle inspection---
.
VOLUNTARY TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT UNDER S99/100 CCA 1974
.
 Account No: (xxxxxxx)
.

 Dear Sir,
 I am writing to notify you that I am exercising my right to terminate the above Agreement 
under Section 99 of the consumer credit act1974. 
.
You will understand that the aforementioned section permits the debtor to terminate the agreement 
at any time before the last payment is due. 
.
There is no restriction regarding the exercising this statutory right, 
particularly none in respect of any perceived arrears or monies due on termination
.
I understand that I shall be liable to you for the amount calculated under the formula in Section 100 
of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 
.
**As I have/have not paid more than the amount calculated under the formula in Section 100 the amount due is £XXXX/zero.
.
 The above agreement will be terminated 14 days from the date of this notice.
.
 Please send me details of how the vehicle can be returned to you.
.
 You will be aware that statute prevents you from levying a charge for the recovery of this vehicle; 
guidelines also state that if you require me to deliver this vehicle 
it must be no more than a short (reasonable distance) from my registered address.

 Please confirm receipt of this request in writing within 7 days of receipt.
.
-Yours etc...
..


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DC.... Amazing reply, thank you so much.

 

I will copy/paste that, print it off tomorrow, post it straight off.

 

So if I read correctly, I can terminate the agreement, effective immediately, give the car back (specifying TERMINATION not surrender) and all I owe is the arrears of two months payments, yes?

 

If so, it's exactly what we need in these tight times. It'd save us a lot of stress, not to mention £200 a month.

 

This forum is amazing. So many rights we have as consumers, but no-one will tell you what you can do unless you go looking for it on places like here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well thats a VT letter, the VS bit was just to warn people.

 

they might not even mention the arrears so just send the letter

but be aware that if they do, check arrears wanted do not contain penalty fees (i'e a fixed £ figure for being late/over/letter/in arrears) they are unlawful and should not be paid

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE -

 

Ford Credit received the VT and passed it on to Anglia to arrange the recovery.

 

Spoke to the Anglia rep again, he says he's got some forms for me to fill out re the collection. Then collection should be about a week from signing the forms.

 

Does this all sound above board?

 

Thanks guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct as long as you are not being asked to pay anything nor sign anything that makes you responsible for and W&T that was already there when you got the car.

 

have you, as advised in the earlier guide...got your photographic evidence together...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking it to the friendly Romanians around the corner on the weekend to get it cleaned, then taking some pictures in the daylight. Always dark before/after work at the moment.

 

Funnily enough, even the chap from Anglia advised doing that, too. Poor chap seems a little morose about having to do his job at the moment. Says that most creditors are being very charitable in these hard, unprecedented times, but finance companies are being real sticks in the mud, which is good for him, cos he's busy, but not so good for the many people who are struggling.

 

Thanks again for the advice, mate. Wouldn't have known where to begin without this board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful what you are signing 

You do not pay for collection

Photograph from every angle with date of photos 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think it's wise to add for future readers just WHAT anglia, burlington or any flatbed driver that turns up can do...

 

in a nutshell NOTHING, they are NOT BAILIFFS

they have ABSOLUTELY ZERO LEGAL POWERS

they most certainly cannot take any car on private property without you consent.

and it doesn't matter what paperwork they have , they are NOT court BAILIFFS either.

 

the only danger you have is if you leave your car on a public road.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, VT has gone through already.

 

Anglia coming to pick the car up tomorrow morning.

 

I've given it as much of a clean as I can (none of the local carwashes are open with it being lockdown) and taken photos inside and out.

 

Noticed one little 1cm scratch on the rear bumper. Couple of small scuffs on the front alloys, but nothing major, and nothing I'd put as above general wear and tear for a car that's seen daily use commuting, going on holidays etc for three years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

which you will not be paying.

you've paid well over 50% anyway too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha, do you have notifications set for every new post, dx?

 

Legally, what extra can they charge me for, now that the car is gone?

 

Obviously I still owe my two months' arrears, which I wouldn't try to get out of anyway, but yes, I've paid well over 50% so don't owe anything more on the car now. But wear/tear? Touching up any small scratches they might find? Extra mileage? (We put 6k miles per annum on the agreement, at time of sending car back it's averaged more like 7k).

Link to post
Share on other sites

everyone gets an email notification to their signup email if they've posted on your thread, same as the email for this post to you.

 

well TBH it doesn't really matter you've paid more than the 50% as such, but well they received more than the 50% so it's a bonus to them.

 

excess mileage is a bit of a sticking point, 

 

you might find this thread useful

toward the end more than the start.

 

as for W&T they can't prove anything unless they have photo's of when you got it...they won't, scratch  it wasn't me gov!!

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...